1 / 61

Shaping the Future of CHLA/ABSC: Focus Groups & Survey

Shaping the Future of CHLA/ABSC: Focus Groups & Survey. 9 th European Conference of Medical and Health Libraries 23 September 2004 Patrick Ellis, Laurie Scott & Tim Tripp. CHLA/ABSC. Canadian Health Libraries Association / Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada. Founded 1976.

faraji
Télécharger la présentation

Shaping the Future of CHLA/ABSC: Focus Groups & Survey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shaping the Future of CHLA/ABSC: Focus Groups & Survey 9th European Conference of Medical and Health Libraries 23 September 2004 Patrick Ellis, Laurie Scott & Tim Tripp

  2. CHLA/ABSC • Canadian Health Libraries Association / Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada. • Founded 1976. • Mission: To improve health and health care by promoting excellence in access to information.

  3. CHLA/ABSC • Approximately 400 members. • 18 chapters across the country – large and small, urban and rural.

  4. CHLA/ABSC • Chapter membership does not require national membership. • Chapters address local issues and raise these issues nationally. • DOCLINE implementation in Canada was coordinated through chapters.

  5. Challenges • Both federal and provincial governments control and fund health care. • No national library of medicine. • No consistency in organization and governance of health science libraries across jurisdictions.

  6. Issues • We knew very little about the demographics of our membership. • Communication between the national Board and the chapters was largely limited to listserv queries on specific issues as they arose.

  7. Issues • CHLA/ABSC was approaching its 25th anniversary. • No survey of Canadian health information professionals had been done since the association was founded.

  8. Board discussions • Started out discussing a survey of continuing education needs. • Developed into a desire to conduct a much more comprehensive survey.

  9. Board discussions • Survey would cover member demographics, issues being faced locally, member readiness to accept an online-only version of the journal, etc.

  10. Focus Groups - Why • Presentation by a consultant planted the idea. • Would provide input from chapters to CHLA/ABSC Board.

  11. Focus Groups - Why • Issues would be identified for CHLA/ABSC survey. • Opportunity for outreach from Board to membership.

  12. Focus Groups – How • Consultant versus Board members – which to choose? • Consultant would bring neutrality, but very costly.

  13. Focus Groups – How • There was a vast geographic area to cover – could we manage all 18 chapters? • Costs were a major a concern.

  14. Focus Groups - How • In the end, we decided to have 2 Board members do the sessions. Reasons: • The consultant proposed doing 5 or 6 regional sessions.

  15. Focus Groups - How • For similar cost (Board members would not charge for their time, only travel), they could do all 18 chapters. • Board members wouldn’t have a “learning curve” about the association as a consultant would have.

  16. Focus Groups - How • Having Board members travel and meet with chapters a clear demonstration of chapters’ importance to the national leadership. • We felt the loss of a consultant’s neutrality was offset by the other advantages.

  17. Focus Groups - Who • Patrick Ellis, then Past President and Laurie Scott, then Continuing Education Director, took on the task. (Guess which of them this is.)

  18. Focus Groups - Who • Both had employers’ and families’ support. • Both had experience on the Board. • In September, 2001, they embarked on their “Road Show”.

  19. The Road Show

  20. The Road Show • Patrick is based in Halifax, Nova Scotia; Laurie in Toronto, Ontario, over 1,800 kilometres apart. • Patrick is 6,400 kilometres from Vancouver – our western-most stop on the trip.

  21. The Road Show • Southern, Eastern and Central Ontario • 9 chapters • September 24 - October 5, 2001. • Travelled by car. • Had a flat tire.

  22. The Road Show • The Maritimes and Newfoundland & Labrador. • 2 chapters plus a Board meeting • October 15 - 21, 2001. • Travelled by plane and car. • Drove through a hurricane.

  23. The Road Show • Northwestern Ontario, the Prairie Provinces and British Columbia • 6 chapters • November 5 - 13, 2001 • Travelled by plane. • Amazingly, no snow!

  24. The Road Show • ASTED Section Santé • January 25, 2002 • Laurie travelled by train; Patrick by air. • Not nearly enough time in Montréal!

  25. Focus Group Sessions • Agenda: • Introductions • Identification of Issues • Prioritizing Issues • Identification of Strategies • Update from the Board

  26. Focus Group Sessions • Early on realized that chapter members who were not national members would need to be included. • Otherwise, valuable source of input, and opportunity to demonstrate value of national association would be lost.

  27. Focus Group Sessions • Each session had its own character. • For some, issues of geography were dominant. • For all, budget cutbacks were a prime concern.

  28. Focus Group Sessions • Issues raised were captured on flip charts, grouped into major themes, and prioritized by participants.

  29. Focus Group Sessions • Input was later transferred into spreadsheets and used to help shape the survey. • Data was summarized and reported to the members via our journal.

  30. The Survey • Survey of Canadian Health Information Professionals conducted in 2002. Its goals: • Provide a demographic “snap shot” of the membership of CHLA/ABSC and its Chapters;

  31. The Survey • Allow Association, Chapter members and others to identify issues and concerns, and suggest ways CHLA/ABSC might address them;

  32. Survey • Allow Association & Chapter members the opportunity to provide feedback on CHLA/ABSC services, priorities and activities;

  33. Survey • Assist the CHLA/ABSC Board of Directors in strategic planning, and establishing goals and priorities for the Association;

  34. Survey • Provide health science information professionals in Canada with their first salary survey.

  35. Survey Instrument • The survey instrument was in multiple parts: • Demographics • Academic & Professional Background • Employment & Compensation

  36. Survey Instrument • Continuing Education & Professional Development • Issues • BMC (journal), Web Site & CanMedLib • General Comments • Future Surveys

  37. The Survey • We decided to run two parallel surveys – one in English, one in French. • Results were to be tabulated and disseminated to members via the web site and the journal.

  38. The Survey • Much discussion about how to administer the survey – print versus online. • Costs associated with printing, postage, data analysis were a concern.

  39. The Survey • As with focus groups, we decided non-members of CHLA/ABSC had to be included. • That meant mailing print surveys was not an option.

  40. The Survey • Fortunately, Tim Tripp, PR Director, knew of an online survey tool called SurveyMonkey. • Tim had used it before with success. • We decided to go with it.

  41. SurveyMonkey • SurveyMonkey is an intuitive tool. • You create surveys by selecting from types of questions (single choice, multiple choice, rating scales, drop-down menus and more).

  42. SurveyMonkey • Options allow you to require answers to any question and control the flow with custom skip logic. • Online analysis tools allow you to view results as they are collected in real-time.

  43. The Survey • The survey was promoted to the CHLA/ABSC membership and the community at large via CanMedLib. • Over 4 weeks, 348 respondents completed the survey – some from as far away as Australia!

  44. The Survey • Given CHLA/ABSC has approximately 400 members, that’s quite a response!

  45. Data Analysis • SurveyMonkey made data analysis much easier. • Survey questions are selected as parameters, assigned a Boolean operator and combined with other parameters. • The results are imported into an Excel file.

  46. Lessons Learned • The salary survey had minimal value. • It merely captured the sorry state of health library salaries in Canada. • Not only was the data not useful to members in salary negotiations, it was potentially detrimental.

  47. Lessons Learned • Doing the survey in two languages was problematic. • Items were alphabetized in each language and didn’t allow for smooth merging of data. • Always number responses – don’t put them in alphabetical order.

  48. Using the Results • Results from the focus groups and survey are valuable to the association Board in setting priorities and implementing changes. • Many exciting innovations have been introduced over the past 2 years.

  49. Using the Results • Better communication from the Board to the chapters and membership is a major thrust. • President’s E-News (electronic newsletter) introduced in 2002.

  50. Using the Results • New logo introduced in 2002:

More Related