1 / 19

A primer on statistics

A primer on statistics. Just what you need to get from data to conclusions…don’t freak out. Summary. Review on Hypotheses T-test example Common terms Correlation example. Hypothesis Generation. Tautological (vacuously true)

fathi
Télécharger la présentation

A primer on statistics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A primer on statistics Just what you need to get from data to conclusions…don’t freak out

  2. Summary • Review on Hypotheses • T-test example • Common terms • Correlation example

  3. Hypothesis Generation • Tautological (vacuously true) • “We hypothesized occupied habitat would differ from habitat selected at random • Descriptive • “Our objectives were to examine and home range sizes of gray partridge in South Dakota • Not-testable • My totem protects me from evil spirits • Null hypothesis* • statistical hypothesis • a priori false • Not-testable • Gause’s principle of Competitive Exclusion • STILL have scientific value • Models- on principles of nature • can be advanced as deductions and used in hypothesis testing • Poincare- assumption, something taken as true, or imagined for argument’s sake • Hutchinson Niche Theory- the niche is an imaginary phenomenon- provides a construct • Research/ Alternative* Non-scientific Scientific

  4. Research Hypothesis • Whether (If)? • existential, the existence of pattern or phenomenon • How? • how do migratory animals navigate? • Why? • ask for purpose reason or cause • winter hare populations declined because of winter food shortages • What is the cause? • A caused B only if A occurred, B occurred and B would not have occurred without A (can’t test) • What’s the cause of the cause and so on…what caused winter food shortages • Could have several causes • Correlation does not imply causation which requires

  5. Question dictates your stats • Are you looking for differences? • Between two groups? • Two areas? • Do a T-test • compares the means of two groups • whether LCR fish surface breath less than UCR fish • The t test compares 1 variable between two groups. • Are you looking for patterns or similarities? • Among variables? • Is there a relationship between them? • Test for correlations • how two variables vary together • Is the density of grazers in a stream reach correlated with the types of algae present • (e.g. flat head mayfly- stenonema)

  6. T-test ExampleResearch Hypothesis: Construction

  7. T-test ExampleThe Null Hypothesis: Strawman (Ho) • Widely applied in scientific research • NOT a true hypothesis • Used for statistical analysis • Set-up to be rejected or accepted • Accepted= Research hypothesis is false • Rejected= Research hypothesis is supported • Null hypothesis* • statistical hypothesis • a priori false

  8. Experimental example • Low oxygen tanks • Measure time till surface breathing begins • Measure # of surface breaths • Sample Size- # Aquariums, # fish in each? • Fish Species- Mix? All the same? • Oxygen curve- Speed high to low? How low? • Control tank • Other considerations? (time, money) UCR Fish LCR Fish

  9. P-value • Are we finished? • Null- LCR fish and UCR fish will exhibit the same surface breathing • Research- LCR fish will exhibit less surface breathing, and begin surface breathing later • Accept or reject the null?

  10. NO! Is the DIFFERENCE significant? • Compare means • 5.28 (LCR) • 1.88 (UCR) • Are they significantly different? • Unpaired t test results • Statistical significance: • P value < 0.0001 • Cut-off < 0.05 • t = 6.565 • Reject the Null of no difference • Supports our hypothesis • Compare means • 4.15 (LCR) • 4.25 (UCR) • Are they significantly different? • Unpaired t test results • Statistical significance: • P value < 0.0771 • Cut-off < 0.05 • t = 1.182 • Accept the Null of no difference • Reject our hypothesis Time to first surface breath http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/ttest1.cfm?Format=C # surface breath sin 20 minutes

  11. Results & Conclusion • Hypothesis- Overtime, the fish community in the LCR has evolved an enhanced ability to survive in oxygen-poor habitat • Prediction 1: LCR fish will exhibit less surface breathing than UCR fish • Incorrect prediction- reject our hypothesis • Write up as: LCR fish did not surface breath less often than UCR fish (p<0.0771). • Prediction 2: LCR fish will begin surface breathing later than UCR fish • Correct prediction • Write up as: LCR fish began surface breathing later than UCR fish (p<0.0001). • Conclusion- Partial support • Why no evidence of fewer surface breaths? • Design Flaw? • Physiological constraint?

  12. Often Misunderstood Terms • P-value • Theoretical probability of obtaining a larger test statistic (more extreme) given the null hypothesis is true, if the experiment were repeated at infinitum • Ignore what is insignificant and study further what is significant • Chance would only produce the significant effect “once in 20 trials” is arbitrary but convenient • Type l error-a true null hypothesis is rejected-finding significance where there is none • probability of a type I error= alpha level • at alpha=0.05, the probability of a type 1 error = 1-0.95=5% • Type II error-false null hypothesis is rejected- failing to find significance where it exists • probability of type II error= beta level • power= the probability of not committing a type ll error  

  13. Correlation ExampleResearch Hypothesis: Construction

  14. Correlation ExampleThe Null Hypothesis: Strawman (Ho) • Widely applied in scientific research • NOT a true hypothesis • Used for statistical analysis • Set-up to be rejected or accepted • Accepted= Research hypothesis is false • Rejected= Research hypothesis is supported • Null hypothesis* • statistical hypothesis • a priori false

  15. P-value • Are we finished? • Null- There will be NO relationship between the density of algae in a stream reach and the density grazers supported • Research- Stream reaches with more algae will support a higher level of grazers • Accept or reject the null?

  16. Pearson Correlation • Is the density of algae type 1 (x1) related to density of grazers (y)? • Is the density of algae type 2 (x2) related to density of grazers (y)? • http://www.wessa.net/corr.wasp

  17. Enter your data Designate your x variable (independent) Designate your y variable (dependent) Leave blank to include all observations Leave standard size

  18. Algae type 1 vs. Grazer density • Correlation coefficient (r) • 0-0.4 (low), 0.4-0.7 (moderate), 0.7-1 (high • P-value< 0.05 • Report as- The grazer density among our reaches was highly correlated with the density of algae type 1 (r=0.9, p<0.001, df=8)

  19. Algae type 2 vs. Grazer density • Report as: The grazer density among our reaches was not related to the density of algae type 2 (r=-0.22, p<0.26, df=8) • CONCLUSION- The density of algae type 1 is related to the density of grazers

More Related