10 likes | 154 Vues
No. 192. Robotic single site sacrocolpopexy : A new minimally invasive technique. R. Thanigasalam , F. Girard, A. Hajj, P-E. Theveniaud , W.Massoud , M. Fennouri , O.Dumonceau , H. Baumert Department of Urology, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris 75014, France.
E N D
No. 192 Robotic single site sacrocolpopexy: A new minimally invasive technique R. Thanigasalam, F. Girard, A. Hajj, P-E. Theveniaud, W.Massoud, M. Fennouri, O.Dumonceau, H. Baumert Department of Urology, GroupeHospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris 75014, France Posters Proudly Supported by: Results Mean age was 54 years (range: 39 - 66yrs). At 3 months, all patients had a grade 0 cystocele/ rectocele (POP-Q score: -3/-3). Introduction Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has become the gold standard intervention for pelvic organ prolapse particularly in young patients. The new davinci single site instrumentation allows the surgeon to perform laparoscopic procedures via a single incision with the advantages of robotic surgery. Aim We evaluated the feasibility and learning curve of single site sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in our initial series. • Methods • We evaluated the first ten consecutive patients who underwent robotic single site sacrocolpopexy (RSSS) performed by a single surgeon (FG). • Seven patients required a single anterior mesh sacrocolpopexy (SAM), and three patients required a double mesh sacrocolpopexy (DM) • Pre- and Post-operative parameters were measured prospectively.Data was collected prospectively with the time taken to perform each of the following steps being recorded : • single site port insertion • uterus and colon fixation • sacral dissection • posterior dissection • bladder dissection • anterior and posterior mesh fixation and peritonisation . • QoL was assessed using validated instruments Conclusions RSSS using the davinci single site system has a steep learning curve, however with good experience in laparoscopic and robotic surgery it is a technically feasible procedure with comparable anatomical results. Acknowledgements