1 / 11

feasibility of A wide-field instrument for the NRO telescopes

Erin Elliott, Sr. Astronomical Optics Scientist John MacKenty, WFC3 Team Lead Space Telescope Science Institute. feasibility of A wide-field instrument for the NRO telescopes. Optical Design by Erin Elliott. Instrument shown here is a proof-of-concept design only!

faunia
Télécharger la présentation

feasibility of A wide-field instrument for the NRO telescopes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Erin Elliott, Sr. Astronomical Optics Scientist John MacKenty, WFC3 Team Lead Space Telescope Science Institute feasibility of A wide-field instrument for the NRO telescopes

  2. Optical Design by Erin Elliott • Instrument shown here is a proof-of-concept design only! • Design issues that remain are engineering challenges, NOT fundamental limitations.

  3. Instrument feasibility • The as-is configuration of the NRO telescopes can support wide-field instruments. • Physical geometry doesn’t preclude fields of larger than ~2 degrees. • Adequate space for instrument packages exists behind the primary mirror support structure. (~ 2.4 m in dia x 1+ m). • Could extend downwards further. • On-axis wavefront performance could potentially support an on-axis instrument – 1.6 arc min FOV without tertiary mirror. • Wavefront error of telescope system is reported as < 60 nm RMS. Will limit performance at wavelengths < 600nm. volume potentially available for instruments Layout of a telescope similar to the delivered units.

  4. Proof-of-concept wide-field imager design • Instrument consists of two folds, two powered mirrors, and a spherical corrector plate. • Covers a field of view of 0.375 square degrees. • Optics occupy a volume of 1.9 x 1.0 x 0.65 m (1.24 m^3). • Possible to include two such instruments (Note: Primary ID and OD are not to scale in this plot.)

  5. Layout details • Order of reflections: fold 1, fold 2, tertiary, pupil & spherical corrector plate, quaternary, image. • Provides an accessible pupil for filters. (Currently 5.5 inches in diameter.) • Image plane configured in three squares, for good tiling efficiency. • (Each ray bundle shown represents a different field point.)

  6. Additional views

  7. Infrared Instrument Considerations • NRO Telescope “use as is” • Design assumes room temperature telescope • Similar to HST situation • Silver mirror coating  lower emissivity than HST • IR Detector • WFC3 • 1.7 mm cutoff at 145°K  dark <0.04 e-/s/pix • Zodi limited in broad filters (readnoise ~ 12e-) • Filters at -30°C • NRO Telescope • Zodi limited ~2 mm cutoff  100-120°K detector • Filters must be ~ -<50 °C • Current design accommodates • Cold enclosure for filters/corrector plate/cold stop

  8. Performance and image plane layout • Instrument performance contours of RMS WFE (assuming 0 WFE for OTA). • Total field of 0.375 degrees square. • 27 4k x 4k arrays with 0.11 arcsec pixels. • 10 micron pixels (Hawaii-4RG10) – larger FOV possible with 15 micron pixels • Bottom field region is inaccessible because of the beam clearances required for a reflective system.

  9. Mirror details fold 1 • Tertiary and quaternary are conics with a coma aspheric term. Both are convex. • Corrector plate has a spherical aspheric term. • Plate is thin and unpowered, so doesn’t introduce significant chromatic aberration. • Mirror sizes: • Fold 1, rectangular, 0.37 x 0.39 m • Fold 2, three-square config., ~ 0.38 x 025 • Tertiary, rectangular, 0.58 x 0.38 m. • Pupil & corrector plate, circular, ~ 5.5 inches • Quaternary, rectangular, 0.4 x 0.26 m. • Image plane, three-sqr. config., 0.36 x 0.2 m fold 2 tertiary quaternary Footprint plots (not to scale), showing beam position on the mirrors, for 12 field points at the corners of the image plane. image

  10. A 6 x 3 Pointing Mosaic with ErinCAM

  11. Conclusion • The as-is configuration of the NRO telescopes can support wide-field instruments with good image quality. • The proof-of-concept design presented demonstrates a FOV of over 0.375 square degrees in a single instrument. • Thermal requirements for cooling of detectors and optical elements and thermal stability of telescope require careful trade for long wavelength cutoff.

More Related