1 / 46

Wireless Sensor System Design

Wireless Sensor System Design. A Joint Course of the University of South Florida and Tennessee Technological University Spring 2002 Lecture 11 – Multipath / Course Wrap-up. Tennessee Tech UNIVERSITY. Weekly Lecture Topics. Course Introduction

fausta
Télécharger la présentation

Wireless Sensor System Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wireless Sensor System Design A Joint Course of the University of South Florida and Tennessee Technological University Spring 2002 Lecture 11 – Multipath / Course Wrap-up Tennessee Tech UNIVERSITY

  2. Weekly Lecture Topics • Course Introduction • Analog and Digital Modulation Methods (1/11) • Fundamentals of Antennas and Propagation (1/18) • Signal Processing Techniques (1/25) • Microwave Systems: Communications Hardware, Noise, Linearity (2/1) • System Test, Evaluation and Documentation / Effective Presentation Styles (2/8) • Preliminary Design Review (student presentations*) (2/15) • Microwave Sensor Technology (2/22) @ TTU • Modern Wireless Communication Systems (3/1) • Microwave Proximity Sensors (3/8) • Microelectromechanical Systems for Communications (RF - MEMS) (3/22) • Internal CDR (4/5) • Wireless Sensor System Research (Paul Flikkema from NAU) (4/12) • Multipath / Course Wrap-up (4/19) * On-site internal reviews/preparation will precede inter-university presentations.

  3. Motivation for Today’s Talk Free space propagation is not reality! Note: Path loss is directionally dependent Source: University of Kansas' Information & Telecommunications Technology Center and Kansas Applied Remote Sensing Program

  4. Motivation for Today’s Lecture • Free space propagation is not (virtual) reality! • Dr. Sarabandi’s WAMI Forum presentation

  5. Propagation Loss – Two Categories • Large scale path loss – predicts mean signal strength from transmitter to receiver (T-R) • Distance, Reflection, Diffraction and Scattering • Small scale path loss – rapid changes in signal strength over a small travel distance or time interval • Multipath • Doppler

  6. Multipath • The environment produces “echoes” • The signal received gets spread out in time • From Fourier analysis: • Spreading in time  Reduction in Frequency • Filtering of baseband signal (information)! • The environment changes due to • Moving transmitter or receiver • Dynamic environment

  7. $1 Animation T

  8. $10 Animation T

  9. $100 Animation T

  10. $1000 Animation T

  11. $10000 Animation T

  12. $100000 Animation T

  13. $1M Animation Large scale effects Small scale effects

  14. So what happens? Fading • Flat or Frequency-Selective • Fast or Slow Speed: 75 mph Wavelength: 0.33 m p. 211 of Rappaport

  15. Why is this bad? • Signals corrupted by multipath are more susceptible to channel noise • Degradation in • BER (digital) • SNR (analog) • Bottom Line – Information quality is compromised

  16. Multipath Effects on Time Domain Data I Q W/O multipath W/ multipath

  17. So what can be done? • Equalization • Diversity • Channel Coding

  18. Equalization • Equalization “undoes” the multipath filtering effect • Filtering will induce intersymbol interference (ISI) • Equalization makes pulses look “rectangular” again • Two classes of algorithms • Those requiring training sequence • Those that don’t: Blind techniques channel Equalizer freq time time time

  19. Equalization with a Training Sequence • A known sequence will be sent at regular intervals • The equalizer will adapt to minimize the error between the known signal and recovered signal (LMSE optimization) • Advantage: minimizes computation • Disadvantage: utilizes bandwidth resources

  20. Equalization of Training Data I I Q Q Known Desired Received New coefficients Equalizer Equalized output equals known Adaptive Algorithm LSME

  21. Blind Equalizations Q • Equalizer continuously adjusts based on the statistics of the received signal • Advantage: no training sequence • Disadvantage: more computationally intensive I e.g., 16-QAM

  22. Blind Equalization Process Q I Q Equalizer Statistics of received data I Adaptive Algorithm Statistics of for 16-QAM

  23. What is needed? Digital FIR Filter Input 0 Z-1 1 Flat Fading Frequency Selective Z-1  2 AGC Slow Fading Z-1 3 Z-1 High-Speed Adaptive Equalizer 4 Fast Fading Output Coefficients

  24. Antenna Diversity • Idea: if multipath is a small scale random effect that is spatially dependent, then the fading experienced by two antennas spaced a short distance from each other will be uncorrelated • Methods • Selection diversity – use the antenna with the strongest signal • Maximal ratio combining – use the antennas as an array to achieve max power out

  25. Maximal Ratio Combining 1 Adjustable Weighted Summer 2 Output Detector 3 m Adaptive Control

  26. Frequency Diversity • Idea: if multipath is a small scale random effect that is wavelength dependent, then the fading experienced at two frequencies spaced a short distance from each other will be uncorrelated • Buzz words • 1:N protection switching • Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (use: WLAN) • Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (use: CDMA) • OFDM (divide bits to modulate many different carriers)

  27. Time Diversity • Idea: if multipath is a small scale random effect that is time dependent, then the fading experienced by the signal at two different points in time will will be uncorrelated • Buzz words • RAKE receiver

  28. RAKE Receiver Adjustable Weighted Summer Correlator 1 Correlator 2 Output Integrator/ Detector Correlator 3 Correlator m Adaptive Control

  29. Channel Coding (Error Correction Codes) • Add redundancy (extra bits) in data so that information has better chance of being recovered (think parity on steroids) • Costs • Complexity • Bandwidth • Buzz word • Turbo coding (aka Parallel Concatenated Convolution Codes)

  30. Summary • Multipath effects band limit systems • Will definitely be a driving factor in higher data rate 3G systems • These effects can be counteracted through processing • Requirements for DSP in 3G systems will thus be more demanding

  31. Wireless Sensor Systems Design Course Review A Joint Course of the University of South Florida and Tennessee Technological University Spring 2002

  32. Course Objectives • As advertised: • USF/TTU - This course satisfies the Senior Design Project Requirement (3 Credit Hours) • Objectives • Hands-on design experience • Coverage of emerging wireless and sensor system technologies • Interdisciplinary, collaborative project development (USF and TTU) • Putting the E into Experimental

  33. What we hoped you learned • Problems/advantages of a distributed design process • Ability to take an idea and make it happen • Design • Analysis • Implementation • Scheduling • Ability to be objective in assessing performance • Yours and others • How system level performance can be dependent on subsystem characteristics • Working on a team in an interdisciplinary environment in a relevant area

  34. Hands-On (BBD group) Future USF grad student? Sensor Conditioner

  35. Hands On (TX and Power Group) FM transmitter Sensmitter Power System

  36. Hands On – Literally! (RX group) PLL Bit detector

  37. Learned Something About Mixers

  38. Data Visualization (DSP Group)

  39. 2.45 GHz Antennas – Rob Harris 55 X 55 mm 280 X 135 mm Circularly Polarized Antenna (Transmitter) 4 X 2 Linearly Polarized Antenna Array (Receiver) S11 (reflection coefficient) on VNA S11 (reflection coefficient) on VNA • Corporate-fed rectangular array. • .65λ spacing • -7.56 dB @ 2.45 GHz • ƒc~ 1% design frequency • T-junction with 90º phase shift • λ / 4 transformers • -16.67 dB @ 2.45 GHz • ƒc~ 2 % design frequency USF EEL 4935/TTU ECE 499 SPECIAL TOPICS: WIRELESS SENSOR SYSTEMS

  40. Frequency Shift Key (FSK) Bit Detector by Leonard Guerra Simulated vs.Actual

  41. Sensor/Microwave Topics • Course Introduction • Analog and Digital Modulation Methods (1/11) • Fundamentals of Antennas and Propagation (1/18) • Signal Processing Techniques (1/25) • Microwave Systems: Communications Hardware, Noise, Linearity (2/1) • System Test, Evaluation and Documentation / Effective Presentation Styles (2/8) • Preliminary Design Review (student presentations*) (2/15) • Microwave Sensor Technology (2/22) @ TTU • Modern Wireless Communication Systems (3/1) • Microwave Proximity Sensors (3/8) • Microelectromechanical Systems for Communications (RF - MEMS) (3/22) • Internal CDR (4/5) • Wireless Sensor System Research (Paul Flikkema from NAU) (4/12) • Multipath / Course Wrap-up (4/19) * On-site internal reviews/preparation will precede inter-university presentations.

  42. Communication Systems/Signal Processing Topics • Course Introduction • Analog and Digital Modulation Methods (1/11) • Fundamentals of Antennas and Propagation (1/18) • Signal Processing Techniques (1/25) • Microwave Systems: Communications Hardware, Noise, Linearity (2/1) • System Test, Evaluation and Documentation / Effective Presentation Styles (2/8) • Preliminary Design Review (student presentations*) (2/15) • Microwave Sensor Technology (2/22) @ TTU • Modern Wireless Communication Systems (3/1) • Microwave Proximity Sensors (3/8) • Microelectromechanical Systems for Communications (RF - MEMS) (3/22) • Internal CDR (4/5) • Wireless Sensor System Research (Paul Flikkema from NAU) (4/12) • Multipath / Course Wrap-up (4/19) * On-site internal reviews/preparation will precede inter-university presentations.

  43. Other Topics • Course Introduction • Analog and Digital Modulation Methods (1/11) • Fundamentals of Antennas and Propagation (1/18) • Signal Processing Techniques (1/25) • Microwave Systems: Communications Hardware, Noise, Linearity (2/1) • System Test, Evaluation and Documentation / Effective Presentation Styles (2/8) • Preliminary Design Review (student presentations*) (2/15) • Microwave Sensor Technology (2/22) @ TTU • Modern Wireless Communication Systems (3/1) • Microwave Proximity Sensors (3/8) • Microelectromechanical Systems for Communications (RF - MEMS) (3/22) • Internal CDR (4/5) • Wireless Sensor System Research (Paul Flikkema from NAU) (4/12) • Multipath / Course Wrap-up (4/19) * On-site internal reviews/preparation will precede inter-university presentations.

  44. Results: Our Impression • Unique educational experience – rewards depend on effort • Projects doable but require more time for successful integration • Collaboration • Good with-in groups and within schools. • Limited between schools. • Should get students together early • Tutorials have a good range of topics • Distance learning technology not perfect, but effective

  45. Results: Your Impression • Please fill out the course survey form and return them by Monday (TTU). • Your feedback will be compiled and disseminated

  46. Final Words Wireless remote monitor is becoming ever more popular for industrial, environmental & military applications Drones for military activities (monitoring/targeting/comm) Global Hawk relays data @ 500 Mbit/sec Military arena predicted to require 20 Gbit/sec wireless data links (!) Program to use drones to drop low-data rate ground sensors for in situ monitoring vs. using high-rate video Requires systems level knowledge in comm/devices/processing/networks http://www.msnbc.com/news/661255.asp#BODY

More Related