1 / 14

General Education

General Education. Report of the Implementation Plan Committee for 2007-2009. Brief History of General Education Revision Project at GCSU. Work started in 2003 to develop a new curriculum appropriate for our liberal arts mission (ad hoc committee charged by the senate)

feivel
Télécharger la présentation

General Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. General Education Report of the Implementation Plan Committee for 2007-2009

  2. Brief History of General Education Revision Project at GCSU • Work started in 2003 to develop a new curriculum appropriate for our liberal arts mission (ad hoc committee charged by the senate) • General Education Conceptual Framework found on your handout

  3. Senate Motion on Gen Ed • Subject: Revised General Education (CORE) Curriculum (3-27-2006) • Motion: To approve the conceptual framework of the revised general education program, with final approval of the program contingent upon University Senate endorsement of a detailed implementation plan to be prepared by a committee appointed by the University President, which is representative of the University Community.

  4. General Education Implementation Plan Committee 2006-2009 • Ceased work in 2008 due to USG core revision project • Continued to respond to emerging campus issues in the following year • Ben Scafidi, COB • Leigh Hern, COE • Barbara Funke, COHS • Gary Austin, Library and Information Technology Center • HedyFraunhofer, OAS • Bill Fisher, COAS  • Scott Dillard, COAS  • Elaine Whitaker, COAS  • Lila Roberts, COAS  • Deborah Vess (chair), COAS   • Bill Wall (vice-chair), COAS  • Mike Digby (secretary), COAS • Lee Gillis, COAS  GEIPC history Members 2007-2008

  5. GEIPC WORK • 2006-2006 • Outcomes/assessment/structure • 2007-2008 • Outcomes • First-year and second-year seminars • Rationale statement for gen ed curriculum • 2008-2009 • Worked to address emerging issues on campus

  6. Summary of Findings • What can we implement with current resources? • Areas of Emphasis • Tracking concerns • Advisement issues • We were a model for USG and UGA core proposals • Second Year Seminars

  7. Summary of Findings • What can we implement? • Assessment • Passed many of the proposed outcomes last year in the senate (Core outcomes and general education goals) • GCSU is better prepared for the new assessment requirements of the USG core policy (Fall 2009) • New general education assessment instrument • GCSU is now a member of the VSA • Plans to administer CLA • New director of assessment and assessment coordinators in each unit

  8. Summary of Findings • What will present difficulties, given our current resources? • First Year Seminars • Original Concept • Add/drop? • Course repeats? • AP credit in ENGL? • ENGL courses taught by MFA candidates • Writing/Speaking Areas of Emphasis • Faculty development • Willingness of faculty to participate Integration Faculty Development

  9. Summary of Findings: Implemental Difficulties • First-Year Seminar • GEIPC suggested responses • Cluster ENGL 1101 and RHET 1100 • Open to many themes, but courses can be repeated in a cluster environment from term to term • Attach one-hour lab to the RHET course • Catches students with AP credit in ENGL • Strengthen writing/speaking emphasis • Would require four-six additional hires • Speech lab presented many difficulties • Fewer sections of composition might enable more participation by ENGL faculty • Limitations on our charge

  10. Summary of Findings • What will present difficulties, given our current resources? • Foreign Language/Culture Requirement • Muddy concept in terms of student learning outcomes • Foreign languages already pressed to meet institutional needs • Would require additional hires Language? Culture?

  11. Summary of Findings • What aspects still present problems with the USG core framework? • Transferability • New USG proposal makes it easier • GCSU proposal is still out-of-sync with the Mathematics requirement in Area A • Required Math above Precalculus USG expectations GCSU’s liberal arts expectations

  12. Summary of Findings • What remains muddy? • Defining criteria for courses that meet the areas of emphasis requirements • such as Global/Diversity Those darn outcomes… How much of a course needs to be global?

  13. GEIPC work in 2008-2009 • Discussions with IDST and the possibility of a compromise proposal • See handout • Beyond the scope of our charge

  14. The Future…

More Related