1 / 31

Status of the ATLAS Experiment Epiphany 2011 Matthias Schott (CERN)

Status of the ATLAS Experiment Epiphany 2011 Matthias Schott (CERN) O n behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration. Content ATLAS Detector and Data Taking Detector Performance Highlights of the 2010 Physics Results Prospects and Conclusion. Content ATLAS Detector and Data Taking

feivel
Télécharger la présentation

Status of the ATLAS Experiment Epiphany 2011 Matthias Schott (CERN)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of the ATLAS Experiment Epiphany 2011 Matthias Schott (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration • Content • ATLAS Detector and Data Taking • Detector Performance • Highlights of the 2010 Physics Results • Prospects and Conclusion

  2. Content • ATLAS Detector and Data Taking • Detector Performance • Highlights of the 2010 Physics Results • Prospects and Conclusion • Summary • Overview of the ATLAS Collaboration and the ATLAS Detector • Brief discussion on the data taking in 2010 and triggering • Data processing

  3. The most exciting LHC year so far: 2010 March 2010: ATLAS Control Room May 2010: First Z Candidate November 2010: Pb-Pb collision July 2010: First Top Candidate

  4. The ATLAS Collaboration • 3000 scientists • 174 institutes • 38 countries • all continents • More than 1000 PhD students • More than 1.200 working meetings each month • Increased by factor of 3 compared to pre-data period

  5. The ATLAS Detector • Inner Detector • |η|<2.5, solenoid B=2T • Si Pixels, Si strips, TRT • Tracking and vertexing • e/π separation • Resolution: σ/pT~3.8x10-4pT[GeV]⊕0.015 • EM calorimeter • |η|<3.2 • LAr/Pb accordion structure e/γ trigger, id + measurement • E-resolution: σ/E ~ 10%/√E • HAD calorimeter • |η|<3.2 (Forward Calo. |η|<4.8) • Scint./Fe tiles in the central, W(Cu)/LAr in fwd region • Trigger, jets + missing Et • E-resolution: σ/E ~ 50%/√E ⊕ 0.03 • Muon Spectrometer • |η|<2.7 • Toroid B-Field • Muon Momentum resolution < 10% up to ~ 1 TeV

  6. Data Taking (1/2) • 48.1pb-1 delivered integrated luminosity • Many thanks to a fantastic LHC team • Luminosity detectors calibrated with van der Meer scans • Luminosity known today to 11% (error dominated by knowledge of beam currents) • Will go down significantly after analysis of last van der Meer scan (done on 1st Oct 2010) • ALFA detector in place for 2011 • elastic scattering in Coulomb-Nuclear interference region • Overall ATLAS Data-taking efficiency: 93.6%

  7. Data Taking (2/2) • For all systems > 97% of channels are operational • in addition have built-in redundancy in most systems • Total fraction of good quality data • Constantly >94% • Typical LHC Fill • Few minutes needed for tracking detectors (silicon and muons) to ramp HV when LHC declares stable beams • Short ‘dips’ in recorded rate: recover “on-the-fly” modules which would otherwise give a BUSY blocking further events

  8. Trigger (1/2) • Level-1: • Implemented in hardware • Muon + Calo based • coarse granularity • e/γ, μ, π, τ, jet candidate selection • Define regions of interest (ROIs) • Level-2: • Implemented in software • Seeded by level-1 ROIs, full granularity • Inner Detector – Calo track matching • Event Filter: • Implemented in software • Offline-like algorithms for physics signatures • Refine LV2 decision • Full event building • Collision rate 40MHz • LV1 accepts up to 75kHz • recorded ~300 Hz

  9. Trigger (2/2) • Trigger configuration infrastructure is very flexible • Coping very well with rapidly increasing luminosity by adjusting prescales/menus • ~10 different inclusive streams written out during the run • Challenges • optimize sharing of the bandwidth for physics • Determination of trigger efficiencies in data • Level-1 Muon Trigger efficiency determined with ‘tag-and-probe’ method on J/Psi candidates Combined muon track pT

  10. Data Processing • 10 GB/s peak rate during data and MC processing • Design was 2GB/s • Reprocessing of all MC and Data during LHC data taking • More than 1000 users running analysis jobs on the GRID • Over 1000 different users during past 6 months • Millions of jobs are ran every week at hundreds of sites • Data distribution on the Grid • Constant impressive duty cycle !

  11. Content • ATLAS Detector and Data Taking • Detector Performance • Highlights of the 2010 Physics Results • Prospects and Conclusion • Overview • Discussion of the individual sub-detectors of ATLAS along their corresponding physic objects • Inner Detector • Electrons and Photons • Jets and Missing Energy • Muons

  12. Inner Detector Performance (1/3) • Observed all most classic resonances • Ks, K*, φ, Λ, Ω, Ξ, D, D* and J/Ψ • Momentum scale known to permil level in this range • Is precisely determined via known resonances • Resolution as expected (dominated by multiple scattering) • Good performance of ATLAS tracker and tracking/vertexing algorithm

  13. Inner Detector Performance (2/3) • Today know detector material distribution to better than 10% • Estimation via e.g. • Reconstructed secondary vertices due to hadronic interactions • KS mass • Use γ-ee conversion • Already very good, but can be improved Data MC Cooling Pipe + Cable Bundle

  14. Inner Detector Performance (3/3) • Particles with higher masses (e.g. J/Psi, Z) are used to assess momentum scale and resolution in higher energy regimes • Example: J/Psi mass resolution (see plots) • Momentum scale known to 1% level up to ~100GeV • Offline reconstruction efficiencies determined e.g. via ‘tag and probe’ techniques • Inner Detector reconstruction efficiency for muons above 20GeV confirmed to be better than 99%

  15. Electrons and Photons (1/2) • Main electron selection based on EM calorimeter: • purely electromagnetic shower • shower shapes • pointing track • Refinement via Inner Detector • Conversion detection via inner most pixel layer • e/π0 separation via TRT (upper left plot) • Performance as predicted by Monte Carlo simulations • Impact of ID misalignment on electron identification before reprocessing • Di-Electron Mass Plot based on 5 GeV di-electron trigger • prescaled in later data • produces shoulder at 15 GeV

  16. Electrons and Photons (2/2) • Neutral pions provide handle for measuring EM energy scale and response uniformity • ~2% in η • <0.7% in φ • Good agreement of Z-Boson lineshape • Autumn reprocessing • Energy Scale uncertainty <1% • Aim for electron identification efficiency determination for 2010 data: 1%

  17. Jets and Missing Energy (1/2) • Jet energy computed from calibrated topological clusters • ATLAS Jet Algorithm • anti-KT • jet radius R=0.6, 0.4 • Jet Energy Scale and Resolution • MC studies • many years of detailed test beam studies • JES from collision data • Single hadrons: Ecalo/ptracker (Use isolated tracks, determine calorimeter response for single particles) • di-jets events with η inter-calibration • Determination via Z-Boson and top events • Aim to reach 1%

  18. Jets and Missing Energy (2/2) • Missing transverse energy is key element for many searches and precision measurements • Governed by strong performance of the ATLAS calorimeter • Sensitive to calorimeter performance (noise, coherent noise, dead cells, mis-calibrations, cracks, etc.), and cosmics and beam-related backgrounds • Calibrated ETMiss from minimum-bias events • Plots: ETMiss distribution and resolution as measured in a data sample of 15.2 million selected minimum bias events • No ETMiss tails after calibration • Further calibration channels: Z, W and top decays

  19. Muon Systems (1/2) • Good performance of combined Inner Detector and Muon Spectrometer reconstruction • At low pt, Inner detector is dominating overall muon momentum resolution (~2% resolution, dominated by multiple scattering) • Transition at ~50GeV • Muon Spectrometer Performance can be assessed via • Cosmic muons • Di-muon decays of known particles • Momentum scale known to 1% • Momentum resolution known to rel. 10% • Reconstruction efficiency known to 1-2% • Aim is to reach <1%

  20. Muon Systems (2/2) • Example: First studies of Momentum resolution of MS standalone • cosmics: resolution from splitting muon tracks crossing the detector from top to bottom • muons from collisions: resolution from comparing MS with ID measurement (ID resolution not subtracted, negligible at low p) • Z-Boson resonance appeared wider in data, due to • Alignment, magnetic field uncertainties • Significant improvement after reprocessing after new calibration

  21. Content • ATLAS Detector and Data Taking • Detector Performance • Highlights of the 2010 Physics Results • Prospects and Conclusion • Summary • 15 papers already published based on 2010 collision data • Many more to come in the next weeks • More than 100 approved results for conferences • Only a very small fraction can be shown in an overview talk • Jet Physics, W/Z Boson Production, Exclusion Limits on UED, Top Production and Heavy Ions results • Further reading: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic

  22. Jet Physics (1/2) • Inclusive jet cross-section • ~100xTevatron • Restricted to 17 nb-1 (no pile-up contamination); • pT > 60 GeV and |y| < 2.8 • Measured jets corrected to particle level using parton-shower MC • Experimental uncertainties dominated by JES • 9% in pT and y ranges considered • 11% from Luminosity not included • Good data-MC agreement over five orders of magnitude!

  23. Jet Physics (2/2) • Why studying Jet-shapes? • details of the parton-to-jet fragmentation process • internal structure is mainly dictated by the emission of multiple gluons from the primary parton, calculable in pQCD • shape of the jet depends on parton-type that give rise to jets in the final state • sensitive to non-perturbative fragmentation effects • Integrated jet shape Ψ(r) is defined as the average fraction of the jet pT that lies inside a cone of radius r concentric with the jet cone • Excellent agreement with PYTHIA-Perugia2010 tune

  24. W/Z Bosons at ATLAS (1/2) • Why W/Z Bosons production at ATLAS so important? • Fundamental milestones in the “rediscovery”of the Standard Model • Powerful tools to constrain PDFs and test perturbative QCD • Z leptonic decay is gold-plated process to calibrate the detector to the ultimate precision • dominant backgrounds to searches for New Physics • October 2010: First measurement of the W/Z boson production cross-section at 7TeV • Already dominated by Luminosity Uncertainty • Excellent agreement with theoretical predictions • See more details in Pawel’s talk

  25. W/Z Bosons at ATLAS (2/2) • December 2010: First Measurement of W+jets cross-sections at LHC • Highly Important since • Precise test of perturbative QCD • background for top, Higgs and many BSM models (e.g. SUSY) • Select anti-KT jets with radius 0.4, |y|<2.8, full W selection • Alpgen used to produce signal template • Dominating uncertainty: JES • Much more details in Sergei‘s talk

  26. Top Quark (1/2) • arXiv:1012.1792 [hep-ex] • Cross-Section measurement based on 2.9pb-1 • 37 candidate events are observed in the single-lepton topology • 9 events in the dilepton topology • Final Selection for single lepton decay • 1 isolated lepton pT>20 GeV • ETmiss > 20 GeV • ETmiss + mT (W) > 60 GeV • ≥4jets with pT >20GeV • ≥ 1 b-tag jet

  27. Top Quark (2/2) • Dominating Backgrounds • Muon channel: W+jets • Electron channel: QCD, W+jets • Both backgrounds are estimated in a data-driven way • Cross-Section measurement with perfect agreement to theoretical prediction • Most precise measurement at 7TeV • Dominating systematic uncertainties • normalisation of the QCD multi-jet background in the e+jets channel • uncertainties which affect mainly the tt ̄ acceptance: jet energy reconstruction, b-tagging and ISR/FSR

  28. Diphoton Events with Large ETMiss(1/1) • Several new physics models predict much larger γγ + ETMiss rates than SM • Example: Universal Extra Dimension • postulate the existence of additional spatial dimensions • Predict for each SM particle a series of excitations: Kaluza-Klein (KK) tower • Lightest KK particle is γ* which would undergo a cascade decay to γ • Benchmark Model • One single TeV−1-sized UED, with compactification radius R • values of 1/R < 728 GeV are excluded at 95% CL, providing the most sensitive limit on this model to date • See also our Prompt Photon Paper: arXiv:1012.4389 [hep-ex], Talk by Sergei Chekanov

  29. Searches for excited quarks (1/1) • Search for decay of excited quarks in two partons, i.e. q*jj signatures • Looked for di-jet resonance in the measured Mjj distribution • leading jet pt>150 GeV • Mjj>350GeV • spectrum compatible with a smooth monotonic function • Published exclusion limit superseded all previous experiments • 0.5<M(q*)<1.53 TeV excluded at 95% C.L. • Experimental systematic uncertainties included: JES (dominant), background fit, luminosity.

  30. Heavy Ions (1/1) • Heavy Ions run in 2010 • lead-lead collisions • nucleon-nucleon centre of mass energy √s = 2.76 TeV • Collisions of heavy ions at ultra-relativistic energies are expected to produce quark gluon plasma • Jet Quenching • First observation of an enhancement of events with large dijet asymmetries

  31. Content • ATLAS Detector and Data Taking • Detector Performance • Highlights of the 2010 Physics Results • Prospects and Conclusion • Summary • Excellent performance of ATLAS detector • Subsystems operating according to design specifications • High data-collection efficiency • Monte Carlo simulation in good agreement with data • Many Interesting physics results already published • Hope to see something new in 2011

More Related