1 / 19

NSDC 2013

NSDC 2013. ADJUDICATION SEMINAR. Difference between Worlds and Asian/Australsian Format (for invited). Manner matters; Checklist-based adjudication; Using clashes is NOT THE ONLY WAY to adjudicate;. Adjudication in a nutshell.

felcia
Télécharger la présentation

NSDC 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NSDC 2013 ADJUDICATION SEMINAR

  2. Difference between Worlds and Asian/Australsian Format (for invited) Manner matters; Checklist-based adjudication; Using clashes is NOT THE ONLY WAY to adjudicate;

  3. Adjudication in a nutshell There’s no such thing as a tie. Each judge has 1 vote, and different opinions in a debate is not a problem. The debate is judged based on the quality of the case which includes arguments, rebuttals, POIs, and the presentation of the case The scores reflect the contribution of the speaker to the debate. Speakers are judged individually, regardless the team’s overall performance.

  4. Adjudication Sheet Adjudicators are expected to finish making their decision, filling their adjudication sheet, and conferring with the each others in 20 minutes. Adjudicators needs to fill in: the winner of the debate, the total team score for both teams, and the margin of the debate. Adjudicators must make their decisions INDIVIDUALLY before they confer.

  5. Verbal Adjudication • The chair adjudicator must make a recap of their conferrals in a 5 minutes speech. • An ideal verbal adjudication consists of: • The winner of the debate • Comments regarding matter, manner, method • Constructive inputs for the speakers (OPTIONAL)

  6. Manner (Style) Elements of Manner: Clarity & Fluency of the speech Grammar & choice of words Political correctness Persuasiveness Proper use of emphasis, tone of voice, and pauses.

  7. Manner (Style)

  8. Manner (Style)

  9. Manner (Style)

  10. Matter (Content) Complete elements for Arguments & Rebuttals Quality of Arguments and Rebuttals Quality & Quantity of examples Adjudicators are expected to give credit to speakers who offers strong POIs, or to give a strong answer to a POI from the opponent.

  11. Matter (Content) Elements of Arguments/Rebuttal (A-R-E-L): The relevance of the title to the content of the point. (Assertion) The depth & quality of explanation (Reasoning) The supporting facts of the point (Statistics, Case study, or parallel examples) How does the point supports the case of your team. (Linkback)

  12. Matter (Content)

  13. Matter (Content)

  14. Matter (Content)

  15. Method (Strategy) Method is the art of presenting a case, both individually or as a team. Team Strategy: Issue, Model & Stance Division of arguments between speakers Individual Strategy: “Sign posting” Time management Role fulfillment

  16. Method (Strategy)

  17. Method (Strategy)

  18. Penalty Under-time & over-time Receiving less than 2 POIs Offering less than 2 POIs (as a team) Definitional foul Factual error, using wrong/fake evidences Offensive statements/gestures

  19. Judging Reply Speakers Reply speakers are judged and scored just like Substantive Speaker, but the final result will be halved. In judging matter, adjudicators should look at the way the speaker compared the cases of both team, and the way the speaker analyze the “tipping points” of the debate

More Related