1 / 34

Assessment and Classification of Mental Disorders

3. Assessment and Classification of Mental Disorders. Reliability. Degree to which a test or procedure yields the same results repeatedly under the same circumstances Test-retest reliability Same results when given at two different points in time Internal consistency

fergus
Télécharger la présentation

Assessment and Classification of Mental Disorders

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 3 Assessment and Classification of Mental Disorders

  2. Reliability • Degree to which a test or procedure yields the same results repeatedly under the same circumstances • Test-retest reliability • Same results when given at two different points in time • Internal consistency • Various parts of measure yield similar or consistent results

  3. Reliability (cont’d.) • Interrater reliability • Consistency of responses when scored by different test administrators

  4. Validity • Extent to which a procedure actually performs its designed function • Predictive validity • How well a test predicts a person’s behavior or response • Construct validity • How well a test or measure relates to the characteristics or disorder in question

  5. Validity (cont’d.) • Content validity • How well a test measures what it is intended to measure • Assesses all areas known to be associated with a particular disorder

  6. Standardization • Standard administration • Professionals administering a test must follow common rules or procedures • Standardization sample • Group of people who initially took the measure • Performance is used as standard or norm • Test-takers should be similar to the standardization sample for test to be valid

  7. Assessment and Classification of Mental Disorders • Psychological assessment • Gathering information and drawing conclusions • Traits, abilities, emotional function, and more • Four main assessment methods • Observations • Interviews • Psychological tests and inventories • Neurological tests

  8. Observations • Controlled (analogue) observations • Made in laboratory, clinic, or other contrived setting • Naturalistic observations • Informal observations made in a natural setting (schoolroom, office, hospital ward, home) • Usually in conjunction with an interview • Observe appearance and behavior

  9. Interviews • Observe client and collect data about the person’s life history, current situation, and personality • Analyze • Verbal behavior • Nonverbal behavior • Content • Process of communication

  10. Types of Interviews • Interviews vary in degree of structure and formality • Structured interviews • Common rules and procedures • Standard series of questions • Disadvantage: limit conversation • Advantage: collect consistent and comprehensive information

  11. Mental Status Examination • Objective: evaluate client’s cognitive, psychological, and behavioral functioning • Uses questions, observations, and tasks • Clinician considers the appropriateness and quality of the client’s responses • Forms tentative opinion of diagnosis and treatment needs

  12. Psychological Tests and Inventories • Standardized tools • Measure characteristics such as personality, social skills, and more • Projective personality tests • Test taker presented with ambiguous stimuli and asked to respond in some way • Rorschach Technique • Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) • Sentence-completion test • Draw-a-person test

  13. Problems with Projective Personality Tests • Do not meet reliability and validity standards • Analysis and interpretation of responses subject to wide variation • May have limited cultural relevance

  14. Self-Report Inventories • Used to assess depression, anxiety, or emotional reactivity • May involve completion of open-ended sentences • Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI and MMPI-2) • Interpretation is complicated • Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

  15. The Ten MMPI-2 Clinical Scales and Sample MMPI-2 Tests (Partial)

  16. Intelligence Tests • Primary functions • Obtain intelligence quotient (IQ), or estimate of current level of cognitive functioning • Provide clinical data • Wechsler scales • Used for ages 16 and older • Stanford-Binet scales • Used for ages 2 to 85

  17. Criticisms of Intelligence Tests • Fail to consider the effects of culture, poverty, discrimination, and oppression • Do not consider multidimensional attributes of intelligence • Have a poor level of predictive validity • Do not accurately predict future behaviors or achievement • Motivation and work ethic may matter more

  18. Tests for Cognitive Impairment • Bender-Gestalt Visual-Motor Test • Involves copying geometric designs • Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery • Differentiates patients with brain damage • Can provide valuable information about the type and location of the damage

  19. The Nine Bender Designs

  20. Neurological Tests • Allows noninvasive visualizations of brain structures • Electroencephalograph (EEG) • Computerized axial tomography (CT) • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) • Functional MRI (fMRI) • Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) • Positron emission tomography (PET)

  21. Diagnosing Mental Disorders • Psychiatric classification system • Similar to a catalogue, with detailed descriptions of each disorder • Patterns of behavior are distinctly different • Each category accommodates symptom variations

  22. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) • Widely used classification system • DSM-I (1952): Identified 106 mental disorders • DSM-II (1968): Identified 182 disorders • Revisions (DSM-II, DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, DSM-5) increase reliability and validity

  23. DSM-5 Disorders – Categories and Features

  24. DSM-5 Disorders – Categories and Features (cont’d.)

  25. Interrater Reliability of DSM-5 Diagnostic Categories

  26. Interrater Reliability of DSM-5 Diagnostic Categories (cont’d.)

  27. Dimensional Perspective • DSM-5 is a categorical model • Some professionals believe ineffective for diagnosis • Dimensional classification system • Disorders reside on a continuum from normal to severe forms of a disorder

  28. Final Version of the DSM-5 • Remains a categorical system with exceptions • Exceptions to DSM-5 categorical system • Autism spectrum disorder • Risk syndromes • Indicate milder forms of well-established disorders • Enhanced assessment procedures • Allowing more than a “yes or no” answer

  29. Other Attributes of the DSM-5 • Subtypes • Specifiers • Remission • Cost-cutting measures • Comorbidity • Presence of two or more disorders in the same person

  30. Cultural Factors in Assessment • Determining whether a behavior is consistent with cultural norms • Responsibility of the clinician • Bias • DSM-5 includes guidelines for conducting a cultural assessment • 16 questions

  31. Changes in the DSM-5 Classification System • Changes in the criteria for some disorders • May increase the number of individuals receiving a diagnosis • Addition of some disorders • Example: gambling disorder • Bereavement removed as an exclusionary criteria when diagnosing depression

  32. Objections to Classification and Labeling • Labeling a person can lead to overgeneralization, stigma, and stereotypes • Labeling may lead a person to believe they possess characteristics associated with the label • Label are required by social systems • Do not provide precise information required by health care organizations

  33. Contemporary Trends and Future Directions • Current trends • Increased reliance on the biological model • Advances based on biological and neurological research • Effort to discover specific biomarkers associated with different conditions • Increased consideration of psychological, social, and sociocultural factors • Growing consensus that mental health professionals not merely objective observers

  34. Review • How do we know if psychological tests and evaluation procedures are accurate? • How do mental health professionals evaluate a client’s mental health? • How do professionals make a psychiatric diagnosis? • What changes are occurring that will affect assessment?

More Related