1 / 16

HEAT TRANSFER TO A SUNROOM

HEAT TRANSFER TO A SUNROOM. the affect of window type on heat transfer. The Situation. Clear Day Mid June Provo, UT

ferguson
Télécharger la présentation

HEAT TRANSFER TO A SUNROOM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HEAT TRANSFER TO A SUNROOM the affect of window type on heat transfer

  2. The Situation • Clear Day • Mid June • Provo, UT • The Pate’s have recently added a sunroom to the exterior of their home. In the summer the temperature rises in that room a considerable amount. Should they have installed double pane windows instead? Should they invest in windows with reflective coating? How much of a difference would these windows make?

  3. What We Know: • Incident Solar Radiation • East Wall: 5015 W/m2 • South Wall: 2997 W/m2 • West Wall: 5015 W/m2 • Temperature Data • Tsur, interior = 20° C • Tsur, exterior = 35° C • Physical Properties • Glass (T=300K) • 1.4 W/mK • Air • K=.0263 W/mK (T=300K) • Areas of Windows: • East Wall • 8.09 m2 • South Wall: • 6.77 m2 (x 2) • 2.60 m2 (x2) • West Wall • 8.09 m2 • Volume of the Room • 60 m3

  4. What We Assume: • Radiation Properties of Glass • Transmissivity = .95 • Absorbtivity = 0 • Reflectivity = .05 • Emissivity = .9 • Neglect radiation out of the room (only consider incident radiation) • No heat transfer through the walls • Tsur stays constant • Window areas are all square (see diagram)

  5. Single Pane Glass • ho,i = 6 W/m2 • qconv+cond = 728 W • qrad= 1606 W • qtotal= 2324 Ho, To Hi , Ti

  6. Double Pane Glass • RaL=91.37 ΔT • RaLmax = 1307 • 1307 < 1708 • Convection between planes is negligible. • Transmissivity: .9 • Reflectivity: .1 • h = 6 W/m2 • qconv+cond= 168 W • qrad= 1522 W • qtotal= 1690 W Ho, To Hi , Ti

  7. Double Pane Glass with Coating • Reflective glass • Reflectivity: .28 • Transmissivity: .72 • Heat transfer from convection and conduction stays the same. • qconv+cond= 168 W • qrad= 1217 W • qtotal= 1385 W Ho, To Hi , Ti

  8. Air Conditioning Cost • Single Pane: $122.07 • Double Pane: $148.09 • Coated Double Pane: $216.12 • $.08/KWhr • COP = 3.4 • Summer Savings: $94.05 • Coating: $36/Window • Estimate: $216 to upgrade, 2.5 Summers to recover the savings

  9. Presented By: • Nathan Honka • Dallin Shaw • Jenny Pate

  10. Appendix A: Radiation Data

  11. Appendix B: Equations • Inside Convection Coefficient • Thermal Resistances

  12. Appendix B: Equations • qconv,i on inner surface: • qcond through window: • qconv,o = qcond = qconv,i • Could not solve that system so we assumed h=6W/m2 to determine qconv,i and qconv,o.

  13. Appendix C: Spreadsheet Solution

  14. Appendix C: Spreadsheet Solution

  15. Appendix C: Spreadsheet Solution

  16. Sources • Incident Solar Radiation Values: http://geology.utah.gov/sep/renewable_energy/solar/images/data_tables/slcbld.jpg

More Related