1 / 55

Connecting Theory and Practice – Part A

Technion Israel Institute of Technology. Connecting Theory and Practice – Part A. Spring 2013 Final Part A Presentation. Contents. Project Definition and Goals Work Plan Review Project Main Activities: Matlab Algorithm + Integration AWR Activities Simulations Gantt. Main Challenges.

field
Télécharger la présentation

Connecting Theory and Practice – Part A

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technion Israel Institute of Technology Connecting Theory and Practice – Part A Spring 2013 Final Part A Presentation

  2. Contents • Project Definition and Goals • Work Plan Review • Project Main Activities: • Matlab Algorithm + Integration • AWR Activities • Simulations • Gantt

  3. Main Challenges • Understanding, fixing and improving the Matlab code • Learning AWR tool and Modeling MWC • Deeper understanding of the main issues the system suffers from • Integrating Co-Projects into one Matlab code

  4. Project Main Stages • Matlab Reconstruction • AWR Activities – Part A • AWR Activities – Part B • A-Matrix Calibration • MWC Development Support Systems

  5. Work Plan Review – Matlab • Matlab reconstruction algorithm • The current algorithm • What is there, what is missing • Tuning detection SBR4 (SBR2 ?) SBR Special • How do we want to display results of reconstruction • Modulate back up to show the original signal • Combine slices, find signal and demodulate to baseband • Enter first draft of MWC schematic Completed

  6. Work Plan Review – AWR activities • Starting AWR activities • Understand current schematics of analog part of new MWC • Get understanding of AWR tool • Define method for in- and output files • Matlab , CSV etc. • Enter first draft of MWC schematic Completed

  7. Additional Tasks Completed • Matlab • Calculating recovery success % with correlation technique • Complete rewrite of Sample and Expander algorithms • Implementing support recovery with thresholds • Complete rewrite and debug of MWC System code • Full consistency check with article

  8. Additional Tasks Completed • Integration from co-projects • Integrating & comparing different Mixing Series • Integrating Filter Banks Expander • Finally - Achieving great recovery results without noticeable redundant harmonics

  9. More tasks completed • AWR • Precise modelling of most linear components using S Parameters – Waiting for new card schematics to complete • Mixing Series full integration into AWR • Almost complete modelling of old MWC card • More details in last meeting’s summary

  10. Matlab Code Debug • Main issues solved: • Redundant Harmonics have been (almost) eliminated • Reconstruction (-1) factor has been removed. Entire Reconstruction method has been rebuilt • Parameters names are now consistent throughout the code - mostly L, L0, m, M, etc. • Fixing “minor” things – for example: • exp(jωt) vs. exp(-jωt) • A.’ (transpose) vs. A’ (conj-transpose) • A=SFD vs. A=conj(SFD)

  11. Matlab Code Improvements • Features Added • Constructing matlab libraries by subjects • Consistency Check • Error check – Original vs. Recovery signal • Improving signal generation (qpsk, sinc and it’s powers) • Integrating different mixing series

  12. Consistency Check • Full article-code consistency check has been implemented • Conditions must be met or user must authorize manual override

  13. Error check – Original vs. Recovery • Comparison Method: Correlation between Original & Recovery Signal: • Where : • c = xcorr(x,y) returns the Cross-Correlation sequence in a length 2N-1 vector, where x and y are length N vectors (if x and y are not the same length, the shorter vector is padded to the length of the longer vector).By default, xcorr computes raw correlation with no normalization. • In the denominator, 2-norm of x and y – for normalization • Matlab code (function handle): CorrXY =@(x,y)max(abs(xcorr(x,y)))/(norm(x,2)*norm(y,2));

  14. Error check – Original vs. Recovery

  15. Frequency Domain Zoom-In

  16. Time Domain Zoom-In

  17. Console Output

  18. MWC Analog Schematics

  19. AWR – Top System View

  20. AWR – Hierarchy

  21. Signal Generator • Analog generated input from AWR • Digital input from Matlab is partially implemented

  22. Pre Processing • In this block all of the components are accurately modeled with S-Parameters

  23. Mixer • AWR unable to model mixer in the way we intended. • Fallback option – Mathematical Multiplier • Mixing series are generated in Matlab

  24. Post Processing • LPF-105 was found inadequate for signal properties • Missing properties for buffers and output driver

  25. Sampling + A/D • Quantization doesn’t work perfectly yet - WIP

  26. Output to Matlab Server • 4 digital channels are multiplexed into 1 channel • That channel is demuxed in Matlab environment • Timing AWR and Matlab with triggers – WIP • Full DSP of AWR output and A matrix calibration – Main open Task

  27. Understanding AWR Signal Types • Signals in AWR can be modeled with 4 different types: • Real Signal – Signals are modeled using real numbers as a very dense function of time(5*Fnyquist) • Complex – Signals are modeled using complex numbers as a dense function of time • Complex Envelope – Signal data contains carrier wave and modulated information separately • Digital Signal – I/O to/from Matlab

  28. Complex Envelope Type • AWR utilizes the CE representation of signals whenever possible to gain the tremendous advantage in simulation: • This representation, that is utilized in all mixer components to shorten simulations by order-of-magnitude, annihilates the wide spectrum of the signals that are mixed with the series

  29. S-Parameters - Background • S-Parameter files contain the behavior of linear components for different frequencies • They represent the following LTI system: • Usually our components will have b1 and a2 connected to GND • Information for adding components using S-Parameters will be documented in the project book

  30. S-Parameters - Example • LFCN-105_Plus25degC.S2P

  31. Mix Series Modeling • Frequency, M and tRise were all taken into account:

  32. Sine Signal as MWC Input • Sine wave was used as MWC input • Fp = Fnyq/M = 6.144GHz/261 ≈ 23.5Mhz • Sine wave frequency - 400Mhz ≈ 17 Fp • At the MWC output, we expect to see evenly spaced deltas, by 23.5Mhz between them • Different hardware channels should differ only by amplitude • Results comply with theory Reminder: the mixer is implemented as a Mathematical Multiplier!

  33. Sine Signal MWC Output – Zoom Out dB

  34. Sine Signal MWC Output dB

  35. Simulations – Results & Conclusions • Different kind of simulations had been made, with Constant/variable SNR. For example: • Demonstrate fp ≥ B condition • Comparing Different mixing series • Collapsed vs. non collapsed channels – • m = const { m ≡ q*HardwareChannels } • Demonstrate m ≥ 2N Condition • Demonstrate M ≥ L condition

  36. Comparison Method (Reminder) • Comparison Method: Correlation between Original & Recovery Signal: • Where : • c = xcorr(x,y) returns the Cross-Correlation sequence in a length 2N-1 vector, where x and y are length N vectors (if x and y are not the same length, the shorter vector is padded to the length of the longer vector).By default, xcorr computes raw correlation with no normalization. • In the denominator, 2-norm of x and y – for normalization • Matlab code (function handle): CorrXY =@(x,y)max(abs(xcorr(x,y)))/(norm(x,2)*norm(y,2));

  37. Different fp comparison • For constant B, sampling with different fp rate • fp= [0.8,1,1.2,1.4]*B were taken • fp ≥ B is necessary for blind recovery

  38. Different fp comparison SimulationParameters: Signal – 'sinc‘ Mix Series Type - 'GoldSeries' N = 6 HardwareChannels= 4 q = 5 B = 20Mhz Fp = 16,20,24,28 Mhz M = 499 Fnyq = 6.144Ghz Number of simulations = 10

  39. Comparison Between Different Mixing Series - WIP • Series Types: • Random Sequences (Using Matlab Function ‘rndsrc’) • One Random Sequence and it’s shift • Gold Sequence • One Gold Sequence and it’s shift • Lu M Sequences • Lu Lagendre Sequences • SNR = 30

  40. Comparison Between Different Mixing Series – Ch=4, q=5 Simulation Parameters: Signal – 'sinc' N = 6 HardwareChannels= 4 q = 5 B = 20Mhz Fp = 24Mhz M = 263 Fnyq = 6.144Ghz SNR = 30dB Number of simulations = 300

  41. Comparison Between Different Mixing Series – Ch=20, q=1 Simulation Parameters: Signal – 'sinc' N = 6 HardwareChannels = 20 q = 1 B = 20Mhz Fp = 24Mhz M = 263 Fnyq = 6.144Ghz SNR = 30dB Number of simulations = 120

  42. Comparison Between Different Mixing Series • Interim conclusions: • For HardwareChannels=4, q=5: • ‘rndsrc’ – Most of the times gives good results • Lu M and shifted Sequences - Mediocre results • Gold Sequence – best results. • Lu Lagendre – bad results! (most of the timeSupport recovery doesn’t succeed)

  43. Comparison Between Different Mixing Series • Interim conclusions: • For HardwareChannels=20, q=1: • ‘rndsrc’ – Best results. • Gold Sequence – Mediocre results. • Lu LagendreSequence – Mediocre results

  44. Different M comparison • M ≥ L and M ≥ Mmin is necessary for blind recovery • For constant parameters, sampling with different series length • M = [155, 191, 263, 299] were taken • fp = 24Mhz, q=5, fnyq =6.144*109 • L0 = = 130 • L = 2L0+1 = 261 • M = = 257

  45. Different M comparison SimulationParameters: Signal – 'sinc‘ Mix Series Type - 'GoldSeries' N = 6 HardwareChannels= 4 q = 5 B = 20Mhz Fp = 24 Mhz M = [155, 191, 263, 299] Fnyq = 6.144Ghz Number of Simulations = 30

  46. Collapsed vs. non collapsed – Sim1 • m≥2N is necessary for blind recovery • For constant parameters, and constant SNR sampling with different number of q & hardware channels • HardwareChannels = [1,2,3,4,6,10,20] were taken • q = [1,3,5,9,15,21] were taken • m ≡ q*HardwareChannels

  47. Collapsed vs. non collapsed – Sim1 SimulationParameters: Signal – 'sinc‘ Mix Series Type - 'GoldSeries' N = 6 HardwareChannels= [1:4,6,10,20] q = [1,3,5,9,15,21] B = 20Mhz Fp = 16,20,24,28 Mhz M = 263 Fnyq = 6.144Ghz SNR = 30dB Number of simulations = 30

  48. Collapsed vs. non collapsed – Sim2 • Let m ≡ q*HardwareChannels • Setting m = constant, Comparing results for variable SNR • m = 105 was taken • HardwareChannels = [105,35,21,15,1] and respectively q = [1,3,5,7,105] were taken • N = 42 was taken

  49. Collapsed vs. non collapsed – Sim2 SimulationParameters: Signal – 'sinc‘ Mix Series Type - 'Gold' N = 42 HardwareChannels = [105,35,21,15,1] q = [1,3,5,7,105] B = 12Mhz Fp = 24 Mhz M = 399 Fnyq = 6.144Ghz Num of simulations = 30

  50. Future Challenges • Deeper theory understanding, improving and integrating new technologies into the Matlab code • Solving AWR issues • Combining AWR and Matlab into one seamless system • Implementing the solutions on the actual system • Writing comprehensive literature, covering main methodologies used in AWR

More Related