1 / 30

CSLI Advisory Board Feb. 9, 2012

CSLI Advisory Board Feb. 9, 2012. Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2011 survey Review/discuss proposed Spring 2012 Survey Any other new/old business Adjournment Center for the Study of Local Issues

finn
Télécharger la présentation

CSLI Advisory Board Feb. 9, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CSLI Advisory BoardFeb. 9, 2012 Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2011 survey Review/discuss proposed Spring 2012 Survey Any other new/old business Adjournment Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD 21012-1895 http:www2.aacc.edu/csli ddnataf@aacc.edu 410.777.2733

  2. CSLI Active Client Projects Housing Commission of Anne Arundel County – 2011-12 • Client: Provides housing for low income families and seniors in eight communities • Type of survey: Resident satisfaction and facility condition – used for planning, oversight and HUD accreditation purposes • Methodology: Self-administered at each community. Residents fill them out at the time of contract renewal, producing a quarterly stream of completed surveys for CSLI to use for data entry and report generation. • N=Varies by community • Current status:Waiting for renewal for next year. • Income generated: Overall $5100, retained for CSLI operations: $5100. • Students employed:0-1

  3. CSLI Active Client Projects Annapolis Economic Development Corp. • Client: City-related agency • Type of survey: Maritime business – business climate. • Methodology: Survey Monkey online; students call to alert businesses, verify email address • N= Up to 325 • Current status:Contract signed, waiting for questionnaire design. • Income generated: Overall $1460, retained for CSLI operations: $300 +/-. • Students employed: 2-3

  4. CSLI Active Client Projects Coordinating Center • Client: Non-profit; helps coordinate health care services for severely ill patients • Type of survey: Client satisfaction • Methodology: Coordinating Center sends out questionnaire; CSLI receives returned completed surveys. Students call subset of client list to verify receipt and return of surveys; second wave mailed to those needing another copy. • N= Up to 2500 – typical completions: 750-800 • Current status:Data collection completed; writing report • Income generated: Overall $2860, retained for CSLI operations: $500 +/-. • Students employed: 2-3

  5. CSLI Active Client Projects Sea-Level Rise Project – George Mason Univ. • Client: GMU School of Public Policy with Naval Academy (Howard Ernst) • Type of survey: Two part project. (1) Mailed survey to random selection of county residents; (2) “Community conversation” - a second survey is administered to residents who choose to attend an information session about sea-level rise. • Methodology: CSLI responsible for outgoing and incoming mail of initial survey; conducts data entry, manages list of potential attendees. Students may act as ‘scribes’ and helpers at community conversation meeting (April 28) • N= Up to 10,000 – typical completions: 300-500? • Current status:Design phase for questionnaire • Income generated: Overall $15,000 retained for CSLI operations: $3000 +/-. • Students employed:3-5

  6. CSLI Active Client Projects Sarbanes Center Advisory Board Survey • Client: Sarbanes Center at AACC • Type of survey: Evaluation of each program/institute/center’s advisory board – perceptions of various aspects of respective program • Methodology: Survey Monkey online survey • N= ?– typical completions:? • Current status:Design phase for questionnaire nearly completed; solicitations for participation to be sent soon • Income generated: 0 • Students employed:0

  7. CSLI Recent Student-related Activities 1. CSLI student interns • Spring 2012: 3 • Hours: vary depending on projects and needs of the moment but goal is to average five hours per week per intern • Duties: range from data entry, survey design, student supervision, and telephone interviewing. Usually active in club activities.

  8. CSLI Recent Student-related Activities 3. CSLI student club • Inception: 2006 – designated an official student club. • Organizational structure:Officers include president, vice president, secretary and treasurer, elected at beginning of fall semester. CSLI interns usually chosen as club president/vice president • Budget: Varies yearly–2011-12: $1115 from student association. • 2011-12 Activities: Various field trips

  9. CSLI Recent Activities-Public Outreach • Radio: WNAV – director was interviewed about CSLI fall research findings. • Presentations: Director made presentation to Almost 7:30 Democratic Club, Economic Club of Annapolis, AACC’s PSSO • Newspaper: Various articles in Capital esp. regarding fall survey • CSLI Web site: Posted all new presentations and updates to searchable database (see http://www2.aacc.edu/csli).

  10. CSLI Semi-Web Panel Semi-annual Survey and Web Panel Web panel: We have accumulated a total of around 1092 possibly valid email addresses. • About 1/3 of respondents accept request to give email addresses. • May be integrating with some courses – likely with PLS 113 (State and Local Government). • Response rate typically around 20%.

  11. Semi-annual Survey – Overview of Fall 2011 Results

  12. Right/Wrong Direction

  13. AA County Polling Results: Most Important Problem - Fall '06 to Fall '11

  14. AA County Polling Results: Rate the Economy Percentage saying “excellent” or “good” since March 2009

  15. Economy Excellent or Good: AA County vs. USA – County looks around 35% better

  16. General economic conditions – % saying ‘applies’

  17. Economic costs, inflation: % saying ‘applies’

  18. Economic conditions: Found job, got income increaseCounty residents vs. AACC students

  19. Influences on Perceptions of Economic Conditions by Circumstances Percentage saying “Excellent/Good” for County, State, USA by Variance from Overall Percentage by: Low income, received an increase in income lately, possibility of losing job, found job lately

  20. Increased income improves outcomes…more than finding a job Percentage citing a condition applies vs. average Lower is “better”

  21. Higher income=fewer economic problems Percentage citing a condition applies vs. average Lower is “better” Lower income=0 to $75k; higher income=more than $75k

  22. Consumer confidence: County vs. students

  23. Support for Proposals meant to Replenish Maryland’s Transportation Trust Fund Fall 2011

  24. Earthquake: Where were you and was there a plan?

  25. Earthquake - communication: Method, Success

  26. Earthquake: Follow-up method

  27. Presidential job approval

  28. Obama’s Job Approval by Party Registration

  29. Trust in Political Parties – Spring 2009 to Fall 2011

  30. End of PowerPoint presentation • Go to Questionnaire in MS Word

More Related