1 / 20

Adoption Near and Far: A Comparison of American, Romanian and Indian Domestic Adoptions

Adoption Near and Far: A Comparison of American, Romanian and Indian Domestic Adoptions. Victor Groza , Ph. D. Professor of Social Work Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences 11235 Bellflower Road Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio 44106 (216) 368‑6682.

fitzgerald-emerson
Télécharger la présentation

Adoption Near and Far: A Comparison of American, Romanian and Indian Domestic Adoptions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Adoption Near and Far: A Comparison of American, Romanian and Indian Domestic Adoptions Victor Groza , Ph. D. Professor of Social Work Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences11235 Bellflower RoadCase Western Reserve UniversityCleveland, Ohio 44106(216) 368‑6682

  2. Key Learning Objectives: • To provide participants with the necessary background for understanding adoption practice in other countries • To learn about family and child policy and adoption policy and practice in Romania and India, contrasting their system with the American system • To understand the logistics and issues that emerge in conducting adoption research in other countries

  3. Year of Study by Country • United States, 1990-1994 • Romania, 1999 • India, 2001

  4. Methods—Issues to Consider • Sample • Clinic vs. Community • Random vs. Convenience • Comparison Group • Approach • Single method (quantitative or qualitative) vs. mixed methods • Surveys (In home, in office or via mail) • Observational approaches • Case Studies

  5. Measures—Issues to Consider • What we choose to measure should be informed by theory • We need to balance assessing problems with assessing strengths

  6. Measures—Instruments used in various countries

  7. Lessons Learned about Research • Involve parents in study design • Involve parents in reviewing results • Deconstruct major trends to look for nuances • Draw from multiple perspective including behavioral genetics, child development, psychology and social work

  8. Across countries—lessons learned about research • Research instruments should be viewed by families and pre-tested in country when possible/practical, particularly for cultural sensitivity/relevance. • Be prepared to make daily modifications in translations for the first week of conducting the study. • With good preparation, families are willing to accept researchers (and foreigners) in their home to talk about their adoptions. • Any researcher must collaborate with in-country adoption workers in deciphering results.

  9. The Child Welfare System Differences • Family vs. Institutional Care • Child-Centered vs. Family-Centered

  10. FAMILY CARE love affection structure 1:1 attention individual focus belonging to an extended system of relations stimulation through relationships INSTITUTIONAL CARE acceptance/tolerance distance routine 1:8-35 attention group focus belong/identify to the group stimulation thru programs COMPARISON OF FAMILY FOSTER CARE TO INSTITUTIONAL CARE

  11. Risks to Children from Early Institutionalization • Health • Development • Attachment • Psychosocial (Emotional and Behavioral) Functioning

  12. Other in Different Countries

  13. Selected Child and Family Demographics

  14. Parent-Child Relations

  15. Adoption Smoothness*

  16. Adoption Impact

  17. Behavior Problems

  18. Across countries—lessons learned about families • Families were more similar than they were different • Children had more similarities than differences • Families had few service needs that went unmet • The service system issues were different by country • Birth family issues were much more prominent a concern in Romania and India than with American families. • Family environment is powerful in shaping adoption outcomes and mitigating the risk children bring to families, but there is still so much to learn

More Related