1 / 16

Choosing an Online Homework Delivery System

Choosing an Online Homework Delivery System. N. Leveille March 7, 2008 The Twentieth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics San Antonio, Texas. Choosing a Homework Delivery System. University of Houston-Downtown (UHD) Open-admissions

Télécharger la présentation

Choosing an Online Homework Delivery System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Choosing an Online Homework Delivery System N. Leveille March 7, 2008 The Twentieth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics San Antonio, Texas

  2. Choosing a Homework Delivery System University of Houston-Downtown (UHD) Open-admissions Diverse student population Urban Mid-sized (11,297 students Spring 2008) Wireless campus Mandate to improve courses from university administration pass rate student satisfaction ICTCM March 7, 2008 2

  3. Choosing a Homework Delivery System Department course materials for College Algebra student syllabus textbook homework assignments final exam review sheet required, comprehensive, multiple-choice, 40 question final exam ICTCM March 7, 2008 3

  4. Choosing a Homework Delivery System The Process Leading to Change CMS Faculty criteria A conceptual orientation (MAA-CUPM, 2005) Active student participation (Seeley, 2004) Improve student understanding Meaningful incorporation of technology Real world applications Revise and update curriculum (Stimpson et al., 2001) To increase the time and effort students spend on homework study for tests Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) designed by UHD and CMS based on State of Texas Core Competencies for new learning objectives (Kuh, Kinzie, Cruce, Shoup, and Gonyea, 2007) Interpreting and using function notation Modeling with functions Reasoning appropriately ICTCM March 7, 2008 4

  5. Choosing a Homework Delivery System The change in the homework process was part of a major redesign effort to modernize the course and include best practices from current research literature. Identified as one of three key bottleneck courses in the university’s Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Data driven Longitudinal study Collaborative effort ICTCM March 7, 2008 5

  6. Choosing a Homework Delivery System ICTCM March 7, 2008 6

  7. Choosing a Homework Delivery System Math 1301 Pass Rates (Waller, 2005, 2007; *Leveille, 2007) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Fall 1998 Spring 1999 Fall 1999 Spring 2000 Fall 2000 37% 37% 35% 29% 39% N=908 N=786 N=977 N=595 N=976 Spring 2001 Fall 2001 Spring 2002 Fall 2002 Spring 2003 33% 37% 32% 36% 35% N=809 N=1036 N=801 N=962 N=832 Fall 2003 Fall 2004 Fall 2005 Fall 2006* Fall 2007 39% 38% 44% 56% 48% N=1035 N=1053 N=1023 N=623 ICTCM March 7, 2008 7

  8. Choosing a Homework Delivery System College Algebra Pass Rates During Pilot Study Fall 2006 56% Traditional Online Homework 51% 63% Spring 2007 52% Traditional Online Homework 50% 57% ICTCM March 7, 2008 8

  9. Choosing a Homework Delivery System Comparison in Spring 2007 Pass Rates ICTCM March 7, 2008 9

  10. Choosing a Homework Delivery System A sample of publisher web sites: www.educosoft.com www.ilrn.com/ilrn www.mhhe.com/hm www.coursecompass.com ICTCM March 7, 2008 10

  11. Choosing a Homework Delivery System IT concerns Support personnel neither available nor trained to support potentially large numbers of students needing IT support Confidentiality and record retention issues Concerns resolved All publisher finalists were willing to provide ongoing support All publisher finalists were in the process of upgrading their access and security procedures ICTCM March 7, 2008 11

  12. Choosing a Homework Delivery System Available to College Algebra students as of Fall 2007 Supplemental Instruction (Gardner, Barefoot, & Swing, 2001) Mandatory hours in study sessions (selected sections) Online practice quiz to obtain chapter study plans Online homework Online grade book Publisher’s online resources ICTCM March 7, 2008 12

  13. Choosing a Homework Delivery System Online materials in development Spring 2008 Additional types of homework problems Chapter quizzes Chapter Reviews Tests ICTCM March 7, 2008 13

  14. Choosing a Homework Delivery System The future will show if the department has truly utilized a sustainable approach (Hargreaves, 2007) consistent with changes proposed by such organizations as the American Mathematical Association (2005) American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges (2006) National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM, 2000). ICTCM March 7, 2008 14

  15. Choosing a Homework Delivery System References American Association of Two-Year Colleges. (2006). Beyond crossroads: Implementing mathematics standards in the first two years of college. Memphis, TN: Author. Hargreaves, A. (2007). Notes from the 5-9-07 Webinar “Sustainable school improvement.” Retrieved April 9, 2007, from the Kappa Delta Pi e-Chapter Web site: http://www.kdp.org Gardner, J., Barefoot, B., and Swing, R. (2001). Guidelines for evaluating: The first-year experience at four-year colleges (2nd ed.). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First Year Experience and Students in Transition. Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., and Gonyea, R. (2007). Connecting the dots: Multi-faceted analyses of the relationship between student engagement results from the NSSE, and the institutional practices and conditions that foster student success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Bloomington, Center for Postsecondary Research. Retrieved September 1, 2007, from: http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/connecting_the_dots_report.pdf Leveille, N. (2007, October 12). Choosing a Web Based Homework Delivery System. Paper presented at the 2007Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Educators in Texas. Mathematical Association of America Committee on the Undergraduate Program in Mathematics. (2005). Develop mathematical thinking and communication skills. Retrieved July 6, 2005, from the MAA-CUPM Web site: http://www.maa.org/cupm/ill_ref/part1/2.html National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Council. Seeley, C. (2004). Engagement as a tool for equity. NCTM News Bulletin, 41(4), 3. Stimpson, V., D’Ambrosio, B., Fernandez, C., Grouws, D., Lester, F., Najee-Ullah, D., Reys, R., and Thorpe, J. (2001). Supporting communities of inquiry and practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 444-447. Waller, W. (2007). Math 1301. Houston, TX: University of Houston-Downtown, QEP internal memorandum. Waller, W. (2005). Results. Houston, TX: University of Houston-Downtown, Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, internal memorandum. ICTCM March 7, 2008

  16. Choosing a Homework Delivery System Thank You N. Leveille leveillen@uhd.edu http://cms.uhd.edu/Faculty/Leveillen Research funded by a UHD Quality Enhancement Plan Curriculum Development Grant ICTCM March 7, 2008 16

More Related