1 / 16

Accuracy of Radiology Trainee Major Trauma CT Reports

Accuracy of Radiology Trainee Major Trauma CT Reports. Dr Chris Bowles St George’s Hospital Ms IE Tribe, Dr S Ameli-Renani , Dr G Goh , Dr R Greenhalgh. Accuracy of Radiology Trainee Major Trauma CT Reports. Background Two cycle audit from April 2011 to September 2012.

floyd
Télécharger la présentation

Accuracy of Radiology Trainee Major Trauma CT Reports

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Accuracy of Radiology Trainee Major Trauma CT Reports Dr Chris Bowles St George’s Hospital Ms IE Tribe, Dr S Ameli-Renani, Dr G Goh, Dr R Greenhalgh

  2. Accuracy of Radiology Trainee Major Trauma CT Reports • Background • Two cycle audit from April 2011 to September 2012. • 1st cycle results • Intervention • 2nd cycle results • Questions

  3. Accuracy of Radiology Trainee Major Trauma CT Reports • St George’s Hospital • Major Trauma Centre for Southwest London and Surrey Trauma Network • 120,000 patients/year through ED • Currently 120 Major Trauma patients per month • 1st Audit cycle- 1.98 Trauma CT/day • 2nd Audit cycle- 3.45 Trauma CT/day

  4. Accuracy of Radiology Trainee Major Trauma CT Reports • Consultant Radiologist available on-site 8hrs/day. • 88-95% of Major Trauma CT initially reported by StR of varying grade. • Are we any good?

  5. Accuracy of Radiology Trainee Major Trauma CT Reports • Previous studies have shown rates of consultant amendment of discrepancies ranging from 17-24% of scans, with major amendments from 5-10%. • Hillier JC et al. Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter? ClinRadiol2004;59:159–62Briggs, RH et al. • Provisional reporting of polytrauma CT by on-call radiology registrars. Is it safe? ClinRadiol2010;65:616-622 • Terreblanche OD et al. Should registrars be reporting after-hours CT scans? A calculation of error rate and the influencing factors in South Africa. ActaRadiol2012;53(1):61-8.

  6. Cycle One • METHODS • Retrospective review of all Major Trauma CT scans for 6 month period April 2011-September 2011. • Classification of findings into • No acute traumatic injury • Minor Traumatic Injury • Major Traumatic Injury

  7. Cycle One • Comparison with interval Consultant Final report • Note made of discrepancies • No impact • Minor Impact • Major Impact

  8. Cycle One • 358 scans performed. • 315 provisionally reported by StR (88%) • 207 (67%) had major or minor injuries on initial report. • 108 (33%) had no identifiable traumatic injury.

  9. Cycle One • On Consultant review • 88 (43%) showed discrepancy. • 36 (17%) had no impact on management. • 49 (23%) had minor impact on management. • 3 (0.9%) had major impact on management.

  10. Intervention • Oct 2011, CT Primary Assessment Proforma introduced.

  11. Intervention

  12. Cycle Two • 6 month period April 2012-September 2012. • 622scans performed. • 591 provisionally reported by StR (95%) • 293 (37%) had major or minor injuries on initial report. • 382 (63%) had no identifiable traumatic injury.

  13. Cycle Two • On Consultant review • 117 (19.8%) showed discrepancy. • 73 (12.4%) had no impact on management. • 39 (6.6%) had minor impact on management. • 5 (0.8%) had major impact on management.

  14. Comparison • Between two cycles • Overall discrepancy rate dropped from 43% to 20%. • Discrepancy of no impact dropped from 17% to 12%. • Discrepancy of minor impact dropped from 23% to 7%. • Discrepancy of major impact stable between cycles (0.8%/0.9%)

  15. Discussion • Significant post-intervention drop in overall discrepancy rate. • Major discrepancy rate was already low, didn’t change. • Minor discrepancy rate significantly improved. • Introduction of Primary Assessment Proforma gives ‘breathing room’ to reporting radiologist to allow comprehensive assessment.

  16. Questions?

More Related