1 / 33

Why the need for a scoping review and for primary research?

Why the need for a scoping review and for primary research?. Scoping review. Contributing factors to teenage pregnancy and effectiveness of prevention programs. Factors. Aims.

fran
Télécharger la présentation

Why the need for a scoping review and for primary research?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Why the need for a scoping review and for primary research?

  2. Scoping review • Contributing factors to teenage pregnancy and effectiveness of prevention programs

  3. Factors

  4. Aims • What evidence is there on factors at the individual level associated with teenage pregnancy, with a focus on adolescents in the UK?

  5. Factors associated with pregnancy and early parenthood

  6. Conclusions • Enjoying school, having positive expectations for the future and having high locus of control all help delaying teen pregnancy and early childbearing. • Dislike of school, low expectations of being in higher education or high expectations of becoming a parent by age 20 are associated with teen pregnancy and parenthood.

  7. 2: Interventions addressing factors at the individual level

  8. Factors

  9. Aim • Map the evidence from reviews of reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and other reviews on the effectiveness of interventions that address the individual factors associated with teenage pregnancy.

  10. Summary of findings By type of Setting • Community • Schools • Clinic programs • Combination of settings

  11. Interventions

  12. Conclusions • Fairly good number of reviews on interventions addressing factors associated with teen pregnancy and childbearing. • Promising programs which address factors at the individual level include community based interventions, youth development programmes and multi-faceted programmes.

  13. My research • Objectives: • Investigate the unique local attitudes and views on teenage pregnancy and parenthood; • Explore the underlying factors leading to teenage pregnancy and parenthood; • Identify effective pregnancy prevention programmes which address these factors.

  14. Participants

  15. Findings

  16. Rethinking sexual education

  17. Improving sexual health services • Accessibility • More youth friendly

  18. Have a focus/purpose in life • More activities and places for young people • Availability of work and making other things more appealing • Vocational/volunteering

  19. Tackle alcohol “There is nothing that can be done” Tools: Put the age/prices up More surveillance Have more things to do Punish people that buy alcohol for young people Change the image

  20. Parental strategies • Active role in guiding and educating children • Work in partnership with other professionals

  21. Conclusions There is no single certain reason why young people have children. The factors related to teenage pregnancy that emerged from this research mirror the existing international and national evidence However, some factors are perceived as being more important than others (e.g. social norms) There is no one strategy that works in every situation and for every young person.

  22. Recommendations • 1. Increased accessibility to sexual health services • 2. Improvement in sex education • 3. Peer led approaches • 4. Social norms interventions • 5. Role models approaches • 6. More youth work interventions • 7. Tackle alcohol consumption among young people • 8. Working in partnership

  23. Stages of change model (Prochaska and DiClemente's (1992)

More Related