1 / 18

Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building

Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building I nternational E valuation & M ethodology C onference 6-7 May 2010 Budapest Anna Galazka European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities, Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit. Outline.

francesca-ross
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building International Evaluation & Methodology Conference 6-7 May 2010Budapest Anna Galazka European Commission,DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities,Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit

  2. Outline • Rationale for the evaluation • Purpose and evaluation questions • Analytical framework and methodology

  3. What is administrative capacity? • “the process through which individuals, organizations and societies obtain, strengthen and maintain the capabilities to set and achieve their own development objectives over time” UNDP • “the capacity to manage the complex processes and interactions that constitute a working political and economic system” World Bank

  4. Rationale for the Evaluation

  5. General aspects • Importance of administrative capacity for the economy and for the people; • Administrative and institutional reforms in the last 20 years; • Role of the EU in the administrative capacity building.

  6. ESF Regulation – the legal basis • Strengthening institutional capacity and the efficiency of: • public administrations and public services at national, regional and local level; • and, where relevant, of the social partners and non-governmental organisations, • with a view to reforms, better regulation and good governance especially in the economic, employment, education, social, environmental and judicial fields.

  7. Purpose of the Evaluation & Evaluation Questions

  8. Purpose of the evaluation • To assess the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of the ESF 2007-13 interventions in the administrative and institutional capacity building; • To provide recommendations on the priority for 2014-2020 programming period, particularly the role of the Commission.

  9. Evaluation questions • What was the context in which administrative and institutional capacity building interventions have taken place? • What is the perceived impact of the EU pre-accession and ESF support to administrative and institutional capacity building in the Member States? • How could a future ESF priority on administrative and institutional capacity building look like? - What could be the role of the Commission?

  10. Analytical framework and methodology

  11. Methodology step by step • Scoping analysis – identifying issues and interventions relevant for administrative capacity building – literature review • Context analysis - inventory of administrative capacity building interventions in 10 MS - national reports • Mapping of the relevant ESF interventions

  12. Scoping – dimensions of administrative capacity building • Policy – organisational development • legislation; • management; • cooperation. • Human Resources – individual capacity development • people; • competences/skills; • operating budget. • Systems and tools - development of instruments, methods, guidelines, manuals, procedures, forms

  13. Context analysis – problem factors in MS administrations • an inherited political culture • weak structures and cooperation • skills and competence gaps amongst civil servants

  14. Mapping of ESF Administrative Capacity Building Activities

  15. Example: Challenges to Human Resource Development Strategies in National Administrations Can not be addressed by ESF interventions as presented in the OPs: • Outdated strategy (RO); • Lack of responsibility (RO); • Lack of awareness on importance HR (RO). Can be addressed by ESF interventions as presented in the OPs: • Lack of sound analysis for HRD development (BG); • Lack of trained staff in HR departments (BG); • Lack of integrated strategy (HU/SL/BG).

  16. Difficulties for the evaluation • Lack of proper indicators • Most of the capacity-building projects have just started • Limited transparency, dependency from political decisions

  17. Next steps • Case studies - selected projects • Validation of findings through national focus groups • Interviews with key experts from international organisations • Developing recommendations • Central workshop on the future role of ESF • Final report planned for September 2010

More Related