1 / 7

Metadata Interest Group Meeting at RDA Plenary 4 Amsterdam

This meeting will discuss progress, future plans, and actions for the RDA Metadata Group. Topics include cooperation, use cases, recommendations, and standards.

frankiew
Télécharger la présentation

Metadata Interest Group Meeting at RDA Plenary 4 Amsterdam

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Metadata Interest GroupMeeting at RDA Plenary 4 Amsterdam Keith G Jeffery Rebecca Koskela

  2. Agenda Tuesday 23 Sept 2014, 14.00 – 15.30 • 1. Welcome and tour de table (and attendance sheet) • 2. Progress since Dublin • a.  Cooperation across metadata groups • b.  Metadata getting a slot in group chairs pre-P4 meting • c.  Use cases • 3. Future plans • a.    Completed use cases • b.    Cooperation with other metadata groups • c.     Aim for recommendations and standards • 4. Actions

  3. Done and Planned P4 Amsterdam • Co-chairs Keith Jeffery, Rebecca Koskela • Our work to date has been • Document on ‘approach to metadata’ metadata requested by DFT • Presentation for Pre-P4 Saturday • With other metadata groups • Use case template • Forward plan • And our plan for Amsterdam is • to interact with as many groups as possible so we can provide the overarching forum for all things metadata.

  4. Objectives P4 • Raise profile of metadata • For data first • But also software, resources, users • Present MIG Plan • Which involves other metadata groups • and ~all RDA groups MIG Directory discovery MSDWG DICIG Common Metadata ‘standard’ contextual Interop-erability schema Brokering, interoperation, services RDA Groups Metadata architecture OUTCOME

  5. MIG / other groups • Plan – involves not only metadata groups but all RDA • Use cases into repository • Standards into MSDWG directory • Analyse for commonalities and differences • Propose canonical metadata ‘packages’ for ‘purposes’ • Validation of ‘packages’ • Provision of convertors • Move to standardisation of ‘packages’

  6. Discussion • Willing to provide use cases? • Willing to analyse commonalities and differences and propose ‘packages’ e.g. • Metadata for discovery • Metadata for evaluating relevance / quality • Metadata for understanding context • Metadata for interoperation

  7. Actions • Notes of meeting on website (Rebecca) • Schedule of meetings (real or virtual) on website (Rebecca) • Volunteers to send in to co-chairs • Completed Use case templates • (later) analysis sheets and ‘package’ proposals

More Related