1 / 31

La maladie de Barth – vu à travers l’expérience française

This study examines the experience of Barth Syndrome in France, including the challenges faced, the progress made, and the need for a global approach. It discusses the establishment of a registry, collaborations between reference centers, and the involvement of patient associations. The findings highlight the rarity and multi-systemic nature of Barth Syndrome, as well as the importance of existing competences and networks in tackling this chronic condition.

frankvega
Télécharger la présentation

La maladie de Barth – vu à travers l’expérience française

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. La maladie de Barth – vu à travers l’expérience française Jean Donadieu Hôpital Trousseau – Registre des neutropénies

  2. 3 ans d’engagement Automne 2011 Printemps 2012 - mise en place de l’étude : Etat de l’art A need for a global approach Agreement between Reference centers : Mitochondriopathy / Hear disease/ Immune deficiency The french SCN registry offered an infrastructure A resident is available for a semester Patient’ association is sponsoring the study Summer 2012: data collection and analysis End 2012 – Early 2013: Publication /// Sept 2013 – working party – with Bristol group 2014 : guidelines in French / National consultation for Barth‘ patients in Paris

  3. Barth syndrome: the challenge • Rare… extremely rare • Scattered • Multi systemic • Chronic disease • Not a single expert in France

  4. Barth syndrome/ france • Existing competences • Cardiologists • Geneticians • Biochemists • Networks – national plan for rare diseases • Reference center for cardiac defect • Reference center for mitochondriopathies • Reference center for immune deficiency • Learning society for pediatric immuno hematology and for pediatric cardiology • Registry for chronic neutropenia • a parent’s association

  5. Method • Observational, longitudinal, retrospective, multicentric survey • Patients: • who lived in France • Diagnosed between 1983 and 2012 • Complete diagnosis: TAZ Mutation • Presumptive: Cardiopathy and Neutropenia and * X-linked * Cardiolipid profile

  6. Identification of cases • French SCN registry • Networks from learning society • Société d’hématologie et immunologie pédiatrique • Société de Cardiologie pédiatrique et congénitale • Networks of centre of refernces • Genetic laboratories (n=2) • Biochemistry / Necker • Request to pathologists in charge of Sudden death program • Patients’ association • Administrative data base: Death certificate / Organ transplantation / Discharge records

  7. Data collection • ON SITE • Medical file / CBC / Echocardiography • Definition: Date of diagnosis = date of first symptoms • Diagnosis Echocardiography: the first within 3 months after date of diagnosis

  8. Results - Logistic • Death certificate, Discharge records, Heart transplantation data base: No data ! • International Classification of Disease: neglects BtHS ! • A complex medical networks • 22 patients • 27 centers • 70 physicians

  9. Demography: 22 patients 16 families • Gender : 21 male 1 female (XO) • Familial history : 2/3 • Median age At diagnosis = 3.1 weeks (p25:0 -p75:6,2) • Diagnosis first symptoms • Cardiomyopathy = 16 patients (73%) • Infection = 4 patients (18 %) • Failure to thrive 1 • Hypoglycemia at birth • No Metabolic coma • IUGR= 7 patients (32%) • Diagnosis • 18 Complete diagnosis TAZ mutated • 4 Presumptive • 3 siblings • 1 Biochemistry profile

  10. Epidemiology • Incidence at birth = 1.5/million of birth (IC95%: 0.6 – 2.3) (or 1 / 700 000 birth) • Between 0 and 3 new cases/ year expected in France (850 000 birth/year) • Prevalence is difficult to extrapolate. Probably no more than 30 cases living in France / 60 millions inhabitants • About 200 cases in EU ?

  11. Genetic • TAZ mutations: in 15 families out 16 • Among 13 mothers evaluated: • 9 carriers • 1 had proven somatic mosaicism

  12. Hematological features • Initial • ANC value : 1.3 G/L (p25: 0.6- p75: 2.9) • 4 patients with ANC ≤ 0.5 G/L • Follow up : 8 CBC per patient • Median ANC : 0.98 G/L (p25: 0.69 – p75: 12.1) • 16 patients (72%) ANC ≤ 0,5 G/L at least ONCE • 2 patients (9%) médian ANC ≤ 0,5 G/L • Bone marrow : Rarely performed (n=2 )Myeloid maturation arrest

  13. Hematological features • Follow up : 8 CBC per patient • Median ANC : 0.98 G/L (p25: 0.69 – p75: 12.1) • 16 patients (72%) ANC ≤ 0,5 G/L at least ONCE • 2 patients (9%) médian ANC ≤ 0,5 G/L

  14. Hematological features • Follow up : 8 CBC per patient • Median ANC : 0.98 G/L (p25: 0.69 – p75: 12.1) • 16 patients (72%) ANC ≤ 0,5 G/L at least ONCE • 2 patients (9%) médian ANC ≤ 0,5 G/L

  15. Hematological features • Initial • ANC value : 1.3 G/L (p25: 0.6- p75: 2.9) • 4 patients with ANC ≤ 0.5 G/L • Follow up : 8 CBC per patient • Median ANC : 0.98 G/L (p25: 0.69 – p75: 12.1) • 16 patients (72%) ANC ≤ 0,5 G/L at least ONCE • 2 patients (9%) médian ANC ≤ 0,5 G/L • Bone marrow : Rarely performed (n=2 )Myeloid maturation arrest • Heterogeneous usually NOT A DEEP NEUTROPENIA

  16. Infections • 94 infectious events, • 10 severe in 5 patients (23%). • Median age at first severe infection was 3.7 months (range: 0.2–30.7 months). • 84 mild infections. • Recurrent stomatitis was observed in 1 patient • Mild infections are associated to heart failure

  17. Heart • 91 % (n=20) with a symptomatic cardiomyopathy • 1 : never (till age of 12 years) • 1 dyed very early – septic shok / autospy revealed no cardiopathy • 54 hospitalisations for heart failure • 16 patients (73%) needed inotropic support, • 14 (64%) needed invasive ventilation • 11 (50%) were treated with both inotropic agents and invasive ventilation at least once • 4 on cardiac transplant list / 2 heart transplant • 9 death related to cardiomyopathy

  18. Echocardiography/ Diagnosis data • 11 patients with valuable information • 6 dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and hypertrophy cardiomyopathy (HCM) • 2 had DCM only • 1 had HCM only

  19. Echocardiography/ Longitudinal data Shortening fraction (SF) Functional myocardic parameters improve with time (>2-3 years)

  20. Electro cardiography • Repolarisation abnormalities in 77 % of patients • QTc: 440 ms (p25: 420 – p75: 466) • No arythmia observed

  21. Other results • Age at walk : 19 months ( p25: 18 – p75: 21,8) • Failure to thrive: - 50% weight < 3 SD - 50% height – 3 SD • Aciduria 3 – méthylglutaconic = 50% at diagnosis

  22. Amino acid chromatography Low Arginine levels Blockage in the krebs cycle at isocitratre deshydrogenase step

  23. Follow–Up Mortality • Median Age At last visit = 4.75 years (min: 2.17-max: 13.4) among 11 survivors • 11 death, median age: 5.1 months (min: 1.2 – max: 30.7)

  24. Survival - risk factors • Neutrophil count: if ANC <0.5 G/L: - 1 year survival : 25% vs 68% - 5 year survival : 0 vs 62% • 9 /11 deaths related to heart failure almost always at the occasion of common viral infections • Medical management of heart failure ?

  25. Conclusion of our study BTHS exists in France !

  26. Conclusion for the diagnosis • Not so easy ! • The diagnosis has mainly to be considered in boys with very early heart failure • Do not excluded quickly the diagnosis of BTHS ! • Neonatalogist and general pediatricians Has to be involved in the diagnosis/ detection of cases

  27. Conclusions.. No room for a randomized trial The best approach: The 2 first years are determinant ! Guidelines For physicians and general pediatricians IV Ig for BTHS babies before age of 2 ? Diet with arginine support ? To maintain a network BUT also to set up a central expert center for the long term follow up. To participate to cooperative studies – at international or EU levels To stimulate basic science research / Data collection/ bio bank ?

  28. Acknowledgement • The french barth association

  29. The physicians of the networks Barth Working party in France Charlotte Rigaud Anne-Sophie Lebre Renaud Touraine Chris Ottolenghi Allel Chabli Philippe Charron, Marlene Rio Pascale De Lonlay Damien Bonnet L’équipe registre B Beaupain Students C Rigaud, S Cohen Les laboratoires de génétiques Pitié C Bellanné Chantelot CHU Dijon B Aral L Faivre Necker AS Lebbre Laboratoire CERMIT F Bachelerie Laboratoire Hémato CHU toulouse E Delabesse M Pasquet E rare: Neutro Net C Klein K Boztug Whim ther net : R Badolato Thanks Grants : Inserm Invs ANR neutro Net Whimthernet/ Amgen / Chugai / AS st quentin fallavier / Ceredih / Barth France

More Related