1 / 25

NSF Program Update

This update provides the current status of the recommendations from the Decadal Survey in Astronomy and Astrophysics, including small, moderate, and major initiatives. It also covers the status of recommendations related to Quarks to Cosmos, Physics of the Universe, GSMT Planning, and LSST Planning.

fredar
Télécharger la présentation

NSF Program Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NSF Program Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Oct 11, 2005

  2. Status of Decadal Survey Recommendations • Small Initiatives: • National Virtual Observatory (NVO) - Framework development funded; discussion with NASA planning long-term support through joint solicitation, currently in legal review; Cyber funds in ’06 and beyond?

  3. Status of Decadal Survey RecommendationsUpdate • Moderate Initiatives: • Advanced Technology Solar Telescope (ATST) • Advanced to “Readiness” at last NSB meeting • VERITAS - • Awaiting outcome of NEPA and NHPA processes • Construction re-start ~December at earliest

  4. Status of Decadal Survey Recommendations • Major Initiatives: • Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) – update tomorrow • Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope (GSMT) – joint technology development program proposal funding in process • Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) - $14M development award in place.

  5. Status of Quarks to Cosmos recommendationsUpdate • CMB Research Task Force – Final report today • Interagency initiative on Physics of the Universe

  6. Physics of the Universe Interagency PlanUpdate • Highest priority, ready • LSST • CMB Research Task Force – Final report this afternoon • Dark Energy Task Force formed under AAAC and HEPAP • Status report tomorrow

  7. GSMT Planning • National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) Science Working Group has formulated a detailed science case. • Consortium formed to undertake an extensive technology development and site characterization effort. • Would result in a public-private partnership with private funds supporting approximately 50% of the $70M estimated cost; proposal to NSF for the remaining 50%. Public funds would support community effort in several major groups. • Current estimate is that this effort would take five to seven years.Proposal funding has begun. • NSF has met with consortium and with individual Boards to discuss timing and are continuing a constructive dialogue • Funds in FY2005 appropriation limited; similar for FY2006; Planned growth awaits outcome of Senior Review

  8. LSST Planning • National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) Science Working Group formulated detailed science case. • LSST Corporation established. • Pan-STARRS underway in Hawaii with DoD funding. No operations money at all and insufficient resources for software. • NSF provided $1.3M in FY03 for detector development for LSST Camera; NOAO has been funding telescope design at roughly $1.7M/year. • DOE labs have expressed strong interest in participating in the project through provision of the camera. DOE science budget a problem? • Technology development program ($14M) underway in FY2005, FY2006 (Physics of the Universe)

  9. The Advanced Technology Solar Telescope The ATST Project

  10. The Telescope • Improvements over current state of the art: • Resolution – ~7X improvement • Light grasp – 10X improvement (solar physics is actually photon starved in some experiments) • Technical Specifications: • 4-m, off-axis Gregorian (all reflective), alt-az mount. • Integrated adaptive optics. • Hybrid enclosure with thermal control and dust • mitigation. • Wavelength sensitivity from 0.3-28 microns (near-UV • through thermal infrared). • Field of view: 3 arcminutes (5 arcminute goal). • Angular resolution < 0.03 arcsecond. • Polarization accuracy < 0.01%. • ATST will be the world’s flagship facility for ground-based solar physics observation and the first large US solar telescope constructed in the past 30 years.

  11. Marching toward MREFC • ATST team had planned aggressively for an FY06 start of construction. This will not happen. • Additional funding will be required to pay marching army and produce final design (note that current MREFC rules preclude funding design from MREFC). AST will fund through FY06 (FY07). • The next steps: • ATST and AST craft development plan for FY06-7. • Site selection complete – environmental impact study underway. • Brought to MREFC panel in March 2005; advanced to readiness 9/05 • In-depth cost review endorsed costing models completed • Attempt to address critical path items – early procurement of primary mirror possible through AFOSR partnership • Let contracts for final design to design and engineering firms. • Complete Project Execution Plan. • Final design review in early 2006. • Construction begins in FY2008?

  12. Planning(Activity Accelerating) • O/IR roadmap team convened by NOAO has posted report • Radio/mm/sub-mm convened by AUI has posted report • CMB Roadmap – this meeting • Dark Energy Task Force – end of 2005

  13. Building a Sustainable Program • Promises to be transformational • Built on underpinnings of community involvement in planning, advice, advocacy and “formal” agency recognition of those structures • Realistic (ambitious is OK, but….) • Supportable by the astronomical community • Supported by the astronomical community (over the long haul – now 15 years) • Appeals to broader scientific community • “Understands” and meshes with agency processes (helping to shape them if possible)

  14. CARMA ALMA GBT SKA LOFAR GBT LOFAR EVLA Phase II EVLA I NAIC OWL? VLA GSMT VLA CHARA LOI? Gemini Horizon Facilities GSMT ATST LSST Intermediate Term LSST Near Term

  15. NSF and AST Developments • New Deputy Director – Dr. Kathie Olsen • NSF program officer, Deputy Div Dir • NASA Chief Scientist • OSTP Deputy Director for Science • New Positions in AST • Two facilities/large projects managers • Additional grants program rotator • Additional program officer for ESM (upgrade) • Upgraded administrative position – finance and project support

  16. Operating budgets and grant increments to realize the Decadal Survey recommendations ___________________________________________

  17. Astronomy Division Budget - FY2005

  18. Astronomy Division Budget - FY2005 Facilities - $119.1 M National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) National Solar Observatory (NSO) Gemini Observatory National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) National Astronomy & Ionosphere Center (NAIC) University Radio Observatories $24.1 M $10.6 M (excludes TSIP, AODP) $15.5 M $47.0 M $10.5 M $11.3 M

  19. Astronomy Division Budget - FY2005 • Astronomy Research & Instrumentation - $75.4 M • Astronomy & Astrophysics Research Grants (AAG) Particle Astrophysics Education & Special Programs (ESP) • CAREER, REU, Postdoctoral fellowships • Advanced Technologies & Instrumentation (ATI) • Technology Development & Design for future facilities Electromagnetic Spectrum Management (ESM) Science & Technology Centers (STC) • Center for Adaptive Optics (CfAO) NSF/MPS Priorities and programs • e.g. Cyberinfrastructure, Math Sciences

  20. AST Budget FY1995-2006

  21. Astronomy Division Budget Growth Annual budget has grown by 60% since 2000 ($73 M) But with $52M in directed appropriations in FY2001-2004 - $32M to NRAO - $4M to NAIC - $4M to NOAO - $5M to ‘grants’ - $7M to instrumentation Unable to plan for the increase and limited discretion over its use. Growth has stopped (FY2005 budget down by $2M from FY2004)

  22. Astronomy Division Budget Growth Observatory budgets FY1990 - 2006

  23. How can we afford it? • Proposals and studies will sharpen cost • Planning will provide phasing, decision points, down-selects • Overall plan must meet fiscal reality • How?

More Related