1 / 10

The Hope for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)

The Hope for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). Meri Riski, Christoph Töpfer. Energy and Sustainable Development Prof. Dr. Schleicher. Technique of CCS - Capture. Technique of CCS - Transport. Pipeline compressed Ship l iquified Importance between location of sources and storage site

freya
Télécharger la présentation

The Hope for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Hope for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Meri Riski, Christoph Töpfer Energy and Sustainable Development Prof. Dr. Schleicher

  2. Technique of CCS - Capture

  3. Technique of CCS - Transport • Pipeline • compressed • Ship • liquified • Importancebetweenlocationofsourcesandstoragesite • Experience with gas transport • Nonetwork in Europe so far

  4. Technique of CCS - Storage Source: Dürr (2009: 5) Source: IPCC (2005: 7, 199)

  5. Economics of CCS • Costsareusuallyexpressed in costsofenergyproduction ($/MWh) orcostsofavoided CO2 ($/t) • CCS costsoccur in capture, transport, storage • Costsdepend on technology, fuelpricetrends, emissioncaps (ETS), investmentandtheassumptionthat CCS isappliedcommercially • Abatementcostsneedtobecomparedtorenewables • If CCS is not commercial in 2020 renewablesmightprovidebettereconomic potential

  6. Capture PC=pulverized coal IGCC=integrated gasification combined cycle NGCC=natural gas combined cycle LCOE=levelised costs of electricity Source: IEA (2011: 38)

  7. Comparisonof CCS withrenewables Electricity generation costs for CCS are estimated to 7-11ct/kWh in 2020 and 12 ct/kWh for the mix of renewables (without PV 10ct/kWh) (WIC, 2010: 236) Source: Dürr (2009: 7) Long term cost are seen to shrink to 30-48 €/t

  8. Regulations and policies • timing • Where does the authority lie for different aspects of CCS? • development towards more comprehensive CCS regulatory framework around the world (Australia, EU, UK, USA,Korea & South Africa..) • geological stability, potential hazards and sub-surface property rights , criteria for site selection and use of a power plant can be defined

  9. European Union, the CCS Directive (2009) • CCS process is achievable and available in larger scale from 2020. • The directive defines guidelines for the geological storage • safety and environmental requirements for storage • guidelines for proper monitoring of the installations and closed sites • the directive requires storage permits and exploration permits under nation states sovereignty • operator has to report the results of the monitoring to the competent authority at least once a year

  10. References • Dürr, Dietmar. 2009. “Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): Chancen und Risiken der Kohlendioxidabscheidung und –speicherung“. <http://www.energie-fakten.de/pdf/ccs-inagendo-v10.pdf> (29.03.2011). • International Energy Agency (IEA). 2008. “CO2 Capture and Storage”. OECD/IEA, Paris. • International Energy Agency (IEA). 2010a. “Energy Technology Perspectives”. OECD/IEA, Paris. • International Energy Agency (IEA). 2010b. “Carbon Capture and Storage: Legal and Regulatory Review”. <http://www.iea.org/ccs/legal/regulatory_review_edition1.pdf> (28.03.2011). • International Energy Agency (IEA). 2011. “Cost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation. < http://www.iea.org/papers/2011/costperf_ccs_powergen.pdf> (01.05.2011). • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2005. IPCC Special Report onCarbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. New York et. al.: Camebridge University Press. • Wuppertal Institut for Climate, Environment and Energy (WIC). 2010. “Comparison of Renewable Energy Technologies with Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS)”. <http://www.wupperinst.org/uploads/tx_wiprojekt/RECCSplus_final_report.pdf> (27.03.2011).

More Related