1 / 11

Danish Development Cooperation

Danish Development Cooperation. Vivi Yieng-Kow Danish Environmental Protection Agency Workshop on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments 23 –25 April 2002, KEMCO, Yongin, Republic of Korea. Overview. Danish Development Cooperation Activities in Danish Cooperation

fulton-howell
Télécharger la présentation

Danish Development Cooperation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Danish Development Cooperation Vivi Yieng-Kow Danish Environmental Protection Agency Workshop on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments 23 –25 April 2002, KEMCO, Yongin, Republic of Korea

  2. Overview • Danish Development Cooperation • Activities in Danish Cooperation • Energy in bilateral Cooperation – some examples • Energy in multilateral Cooperation – some examples • Energy under MIFRESTA – some examples • Lessons Learned

  3. Danish Development Cooperation • Poverty reduction through sustainable development. • Provided as: • Bilateral cooperation • 15 programme partner countries (low income countries) • Private Sector Programme • Mixed Credit Facility • NGOs • Multilateral cooperation - UN organisations, the • Development banks and GEF for instance. • MIFRESTA - environment, natural disasters and peace. • Low and middle income + economies in transition. • UNEP/Risø activities

  4. Activities in Danish Cooperation • Partner countries’ needs and priorities (PRSP) • Low-income countries • broad-based enabling frameworks • Middle-income countries • specific gaps • Capacity development and technology transfer • Assessment of alternative technological options required. • RET and EE on supply and demand side.

  5. Energy in bilateral cooperation – some examples Nepal In 1999 a 5 year programme (about USD 20M) • Improved cooking stoves. – 15.000 have been realised to date • Electricity from micro-hydropower plants – 300 kW are installed to date • Solar energy to households – about 8.000 installations have been realised to date

  6. Energy in bilateral cooperation – some examples Burkina Faso On the 2nd 5-year programme (about USD 40M) • Institutional strengthening – frameworks • Traditional energy • RET and EE (industry + household/public sector + norms for buildings) • Rural electrification – demonstration projects

  7. Energy in bilateral cooperation – some examples Niger and Ghana Traditional energy and RET • Preparation of energy sector programme in Ghana (about USD 30M) • Rural electrification • Traditional + RET Egypt • Programme on RET and EE on demand and supply side (USD 20M)

  8. Energy in bilateral cooperation – some examples Mozambique Initiated in 2002 (about USD 60M). Sofola chosen. • End-users’ identified needs for energy services • Network-building. Public – private partnerships • Institutional strengthening at local level • Identified needs for CB of stakeholders involved

  9. Energy in bilateral cooperation – some examples • Earmarked funds for RET and EE development to WB and ADB • Affrei – demonstration programme - “next generation” of energy projects from government-led to private-led rural electrification/ transformation - cross-sectoral approach • UNEP/Risø and CTI • Promote sustainable energy solutions

  10. Energy under MIFRESTA – some examples • Projects on - RET (wind and solar) - EE (building sector in South Africa) - Institutional strengthening – planning, frameworks in a number of African and Asian Countries • Projects in economies in transition - Improved heating systems - District heating

  11. Lessons Learned • Organisational set-up is the single most important thing • Top down vs Buttom up. • Demonstration projects – scaling up to make a difference • Private sector involvement in all seizes

More Related