1 / 72

America’s Dual Court System

America’s Dual Court System. The United States has courts on both the federal and state levels. This dual system reflects the state’s need to retain judicial autonomy separate from the federal government. Most criminal cases originate within state courts. Jurisdiction.

gailj
Télécharger la présentation

America’s Dual Court System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. America’s Dual Court System • The United States has courts on both the federal and state levels. • This dual system reflects the state’s need to retain judicial autonomy separate from the federal government. • Most criminal cases originate within state courts.

  2. Jurisdiction • The jurisdictionof a court refers to those cases in which it may exercise lawful authority • Determined by statute or constitution

  3. A Typical State Court System FIGURE 9–2 A typical state court system.

  4. FIGURE 9–1 The structure of the federal courts. Federal Court System

  5. Massachusetts Bay Colony • 1629—Massachusetts Bay Colony created a General Court, which combined legislative and judicial duties. • 1639—County courts were established in the outlying areas. The General Court became primarily a court of appeal.

  6. Pennsylvania • Early system based on belief that “Every man could serve as his own lawyer.” • “Common peacemakers” served as referees in disputes. Their decisions were binding.

  7. Early Court Systems • Prior to 1776 most colonies restricted the number of lawyers allowed to practice. • Between 1695 and 1769, New York allowed only 41 lawyers to practice law. • Structure of colonial courts were not uniform • No distinction between original and appellate jurisdiction

  8. Original Jurisdiction … the lawful authority of a court to hear or to act on a case from its beginning and to pass judgment on the law and the facts. …may be over a specific geographic area or over particular types of cases. Appellate Jurisdiction …the lawful authority of a court to review a decision made by a lower court. Original vs. Appellate Jurisdiction

  9. Federal Judiciary Act of 1789 • 3-Tier Model for Court System • Trial courts of limited jurisdiction • Trial courts of general jurisdiction • Appellate courts

  10. State Court Systems Today • Many differences among state courts. • Most use the three-tiered structure. • Trial courts of limited jurisdiction • Trial courts of general jurisdiction • Appellate courts • The court reform movement continues today, seeking to simplify and unify court structures.

  11. State Trial Courts • Where criminal cases “begin.” • Bail hearings • Arraignments • Enters pleas • Conducts trials • Sentences • Two types of trial courts: • Courts of limited, or special, jurisdiction (lower courts) • Courts of general jurisdiction

  12. State Trial Courts: Courts of Limited Jurisdiction • Authorized to hear: • Misdemeanors, family disputes, traffic violations, and small claims • Rarely hold jury trials • Do not maintain records of proceedings (just charge, plea, finding, and sentence) • Less formal than higher courts

  13. State Trial Courts: Courts of General Jurisdiction • Also called: high courts, circuit courts, or superior courts. • Formal courts that make full use of juries, witnesses, prosecutors, defense attorneys • Authorized to hear: • Any criminal case • Lower court appeals • Trial de novo

  14. Adversarial Process • …pits the interests of the state, represented by prosecutors, against the accused, represented by defense counsel, in a process constrained by procedural rules specified in law and by tradition.

  15. State Appellate Courts • 39 states have intermediate and high-level appellate courts (courts of last resorts). • All states have supreme courts.

  16. Appeals • Appeals are requests by a defendant to a higher court asking it to review the actions of a lower court. • Some cases (involving death penalty or life sentences) are automatically appealed. • Appellate court reviews transcripts from lower trial courts and may allow both sides to make oral arguments.

  17. Appeals: The Results • Most convictions are confirmed. • Some decisions are reversed and cases remanded. • Recourse may be to a state supreme court. • Generally, state supreme court is the court of last resort.

  18. Appeals: Moving to the Federal System • Cases can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court if they are based on a claimed violation of the defendant’s rights as guaranteed under federal law or the U. S. Constitution.

  19. Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes (1993) • “A respondent is entitled to a federal evidentiary hearing [only] if he can show cause for his failure to develop the facts in the state court proceedings. • “It is hardly a good use of scarce judicial resources to duplicate fact-finding in federal court merely because petitioner has negligently failed to take advantage of opportunities in state court proceedings.”

  20. Herrera v. Collins (1993) • Evidence of innocence is no reason for a federal court to order a new trial if constitutional grounds are lacking. • “Where a defendant has been afforded a fair trial and convicted of the offense for which he was charged, the constitutional presumption of innocence disappears.”

  21. State Court Administrator’s Duties • Prepare, present, oversee court system’s budget • Analyze case flow and determine allocation of personnel and how to streamline cases • Gather and present statistics • Serve as liaison between legislators and court • Develop and coordinate funding requests • Manage court personnel (promotions, benefits) • Coordinate plans to train judges and other personnel • Assign judges to judicial districts • Review payments to counsel for indigent defendants

  22. Dispute Resolution Centers • Offer a way to resolve disputes without a formal hearing • Over 200 programs nationwide • Frequently staffed by volunteers • May or may not be run by the courts • Central feature of restorative justice

  23. Community Courts • Low level courts focusing on quality-of-life crimes that erode neighborhood morale • Emphasize problem solving rather than punishment • Build on restorative principles such as community service and restitution

  24. The Federal Court System • Established by the U.S. Constitution • Article III, Section 1 • “One Supreme Court, and such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”

  25. Jurisdiction of Federal Courts • Article III, Section 2 • Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases arising under the Constitution, federal law, and treaties. • Federal courts settle disputes between states and have jurisdiction in cases where one of the parties is a state.

  26. Structure of Federal Court System • Three Levels of Courts • U.S. Supreme Court • U.S. Courts of Appeals • U.S. District Courts

  27. U.S. District Courts • There are 94 judicial districts • At least 1 district court per state • District courts in Puerto Rico, the • District of Columbia, and other U.S. • Territories • The trial courts of the federal system • Original jurisdiction over all cases involving alleged violations of federal statutes

  28. District Court Judges • There are 650 district court judges. • Appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate • Serve for life • District court judges are assisted by magistrate judges, who: • Conduct arraignments • Set bail • Issue warrants • Try minor offenders

  29. U.S. Courts of Appeal: Circuit Courts • There are 13 U.S. Courts of Appeals • The 94 judicial districts are organized into 12 regions (circuits), each with 1 Circuit Court. • The Federal Circuit has 1 U.S. Court of Appeals. • 167 appeals court judges • Review cases on appeal from U. S. district courts and trial-level federal courts

  30. FIGURE 9–3 Geographic boundaries of the U.S. courts of appeals. U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal

  31. U.S. Courts of Appeal: Circuit Courts • Have mandatory jurisdiction over decisions of appealed district court cases • Appeals are classified as: • Frivolous • Ritualistic • Nonconsensual • The number of federal criminal appeals reached record high levels in 2005.

  32. Right to Appeal • The Constitution guarantees a right to appeal. • A defendant’s right to appeal, however, has been interpreted to mean the right to one appeal. • Therefore, the U.S. Supreme Court does not hear every appeal by defendants dissatisfied with the decision of a federal appeals court.

  33. U.S. Supreme Court • The U.S. Supreme Court consists of nine justices: • Eight Associate Justices • One Chief Justice • Justices are nominated by the President, confirmed by the Senate, and serve for life.

  34. Jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court • Original jurisdiction • Limited • Reserved for disputes between states and some cases of attorney disbarment • Appellate jurisdiction • Reviews the decisions from U.S. Courts of Appeals and state supreme courts

  35. U.S. Supreme Court: Appeals • Of 5,000 annual requests for review, only about 200 are heard. • Four justices must vote in favor of a hearing for a case to be heard. • Usually the Court only reviews cases that involve a substantial federal question. • The Court issues a writ of certiorari to a lower court. • The Court reviews transcripts and hears brief oral arguments.

  36. Writ of Certiorari • … a writ issued from an appellate court for the purpose of obtaining from a lower court the record of its proceedings in a particular case.

  37. Judicial Review • … the power of a court to review actions and decisions made by other agencies of government. • It is probably the U.S. Supreme Court’s greatest power. • Marbury v. Madison (1803)

  38. Opinions of the Court • Supreme Court decisions are rarely unanimous. • Types of opinions: • Majority—Justices agree in outcome and reasoning. This is the opinion of the court. • Concurring—Agree with outcome, but for different reasons. • Dissenting—Disagree with outcome.

  39. Professional (Courtroom Work Group) Judge Prosecuting attorney Defense attorney Bailiff Court reporter Clerk of the court Expert witnesses Non-Professional (Outsiders) Lay witnesses Jurors Defendant Victim Spectators Press Courtroom Participants

  40. The Judge • Primary duty  to ensure justice • Responsibilities include: • Ruling on most matters of the law • Weighing objections • Deciding the admissibility of evidence • Sentencing offenders • Disciplining disorderly courtroom attendees • Deciding guilt or innocence (for bench trials)

  41. The Judge • The chief judge handles administrative responsibilities if there is no court administrator. • The chief judge: • Hires staff • Ensures adequate training of new judges and staff • Generally manages court operations

  42. Federal Judges Nominated by President Confirmed by senate State Judges Popular election Gubernatorial appointment Missouri Plan (combines appointment and election) Judicial Selection

  43. Missouri Plan • Non-partisan committee creates a list of possible candidates. • Final list sent to governor’s office. • The governor appoints from the list. • After a specified time period, the appointed judge stands for election.

  44. Judges: Qualifications • At general and appellate levels: • Be a member of the state bar • Be a licensed attorney • Hold a law degree (in most states) • Attend professional training • In some states, lower court judges may be elected without educational or other professional requirements.

  45. Prosecutor • Prosecutors can be elected or appointed. • All but five states elect prosecutors. • Prosecutors are elected for four-year terms. • Five states and the federal government appoint their prosecutors.

  46. Prosecutor’s Responsibilities • Present the state’s case against the defendant • State has the burden of proof • Supervise staff of assistant district attorneys • Serve as quasi-legal advisor to police • Files appeals on behalf of the state • Makes presentations to parole boards

  47. Prosecutorial Discretion • Prosecutor decides: • Whether or not to charge someone with a crime • Which charges are to be filed against the defendant • Whether multiple charges should be filed together or separately • When to schedule cases for trial • Whether or not to accept a negotiated plea • What evidence to present, including witnesses • What sentencing recommendations to make

  48. Case Law • Brady v. Maryland (1963) • U. S. v. Bagley (1985) • Imbler v. Patchman (1976) • Burns v. Reed (1991)

  49. The Prosecutor’s Professional Responsibility • Prosecutors are expected to abide by various standards of professional responsibility, such as those found in the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Standards. • Prosecutors are barred from advocating any fact or position they know is untrue.

More Related