90 likes | 207 Vues
The European Community (EC) allocates significant development aid, but issues such as low transparency, inadequate civil society participation, and a lack of focus on environmental sustainability threaten its effectiveness. An examination of EC policies reveals that the aid often undermines forest conservation, compromising the livelihoods of poor communities reliant on these natural resources. To achieve genuine poverty alleviation, it is essential to prioritize environmental integrity, support the rights of Indigenous Peoples, and ensure local community involvement in the decision-making process.
E N D
EC aid FERN
Introduction • EC aid= European Community (EC) development aid. • Managed by the European Commission • 9.7 billion Euros in 2001 • Low transparency and openess • Development of environmental and social policies- behind other donors
Why are we interested in EC aid? • 1. Poor people depend on forests’ natural resources for survival. IP’s have specific links with forests and specific rights. Aid funds that threathen forests will undermine these people’s livelihood • 2. Aid funds can threathen forests by funding directly bad forests projects, by ignoring forests and forests peoples in other aid funding: road, mining support, structural adjustment support, trade promotion, etc… • 3. Civil society participation: lacking • 4. Grant (tax payer) money is furthering the economic and political agenda of the EU
EC development policy • Main objective: poverty alleviation Six focal areas: • Trade and development • Regional integration and co-operation • Macro economic policies • Transport • Food security and rural development • Institutional capacity building • Environment, Human rights and Gender to be mainstreamed • NGO/FERN protests • EC Development Policy is part of the problem , not part of the solution. Grant money is being used to further the econominc andpolitical agenda of the EU • No forest strategy exist to support integration of forests and forests peoples’ interests in programming documents
EC aid programming • Country and Regional Strategy Papers • Identify priority areas of intervention • Country ownership (3 to 5 years) • Civil society participation • Under the umbrella of PRSPs • Developed at country level and approved in Brussels • Mid-term review
Have environment/forests issues been taken into consideration into CSPs/RSPs? • Investigate 18 CSPs and RSPs in highly forested countries • Main findings • Selection of focal areas • Quality of CSPs • Environment: poorly analysed and not integrated • Transport and importance of roads • Inadequate consultation with civil society • Neglect of Ips issues • Almost no funding for forests and the environment
What we want • An implementation of EC development policy that focuses truly on poverty alleviation • A programming of aid that understand that environmental integirty and sustainable management of natural resources are pre-conditions for any development • Policies and programming developed and implemented only with full participation of local communities and IPs and civil society at large • Policies and programming that fully respects IP’s rights • Policies and programming that ensures transparency and good governance
EC Forest Platform • There is no platform of environmental NGOs looking at development policies and programmes and their impact on forests and forests peoples