1 / 6

Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development?

Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development?. Gerwin Smit, MSc; Raoul M. Bongers, MSc, PhD; Corry K. Van der Sluis, MD, PhD; Dick H. Plettenburg, MSc, PhD. Aim

galvin-gamble
Télécharger la présentation

Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? Gerwin Smit, MSc; Raoul M. Bongers, MSc, PhD; Corry K. Van der Sluis, MD, PhD; Dick H. Plettenburg, MSc, PhD

  2. Aim • Objectively evaluate mechanical performance of adult-size voluntary opening (VO) prosthetic terminal devices and select best tested device. • Consider whether VO devices have improved in last 2 decades. • Relevance • Help patients select appropriate devices. • Help manufacturers improve their designs.

  3. Methods • Quantitatively tested 9 devices: • 4 hooks: • Hosmer model 5XA. • Hosmer Sierra 2 Load VO. • RSL Steeper Carbon Gripper. • Otto Bock model 10A60. • 5 hands: • Becker Imperial. • Hosmer Sierra VO. • Hosmer Soft VO. • RSL Steeper VO. • Otto Bock VO. • Measured: • Pinch forces. • Activation forces. • Cable displacements. • Mass. • Opening span. • Calculated work and hysteresis. • Compared results with 1987 data.

  4. Test set up. Cable activation force and displacement are measured. Fact = force activation cable, LVDT = linear variable differential transformer, mVact = voltage force sensor (unamplified), USB = universal serial bus, Vact = voltage force sensor (amplified), VLVDT = voltage displacement sensor, Xact = displacement activation cable.

  5. Results • Hooks vs hands: • Hooks required lower activation forces and delivered higher pinch forces than hands. • Activation forces: • Very high for several devices. • Pinch forces: • Too low for all tested hands. • Best hook: • Hosmer model 5XA hook with three bands. • Best hand: • Hosmer Sierra VO hand.

  6. Conclusions • We found no improvements in VO devices compared with data from 1987.

More Related