1 / 17

Phil 7570, Fall 2007 Bryan Benham

The Ethical Challenge of Animal Experimentation. Phil 7570, Fall 2007 Bryan Benham. 1. Outline. The Ethical Challenge Moral Status of Animals Advocacy Changing the Debate. The Ethical Challenge. Complete abolition. Anything goes. Benefits of Animal Exp.

garin
Télécharger la présentation

Phil 7570, Fall 2007 Bryan Benham

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Ethical Challenge of Animal Experimentation Phil 7570, Fall 2007 Bryan Benham 1

  2. Outline • The Ethical Challenge • Moral Status of Animals • Advocacy • Changing the Debate

  3. The Ethical Challenge Complete abolition Anything goes

  4. Benefits of Animal Exp. We [medical researchers] have a duty to find treatments for human disease and suffering,… unfortunately that requires animal experimentation… Sometimes there is no other way to discover the answer to a research question than to test it on an animal model. We can’t do these types of experiments on humans.

  5. The Moral Challenge Complete abolition Anything goes Not practical, nor possible in foreseeable future

  6. Regulatory Landscape • Animal Welfare Act (7 USC, 2131-2156) • Insure humane care and treatment, transportation, and sale • Protected species: birds, rats of the genus Rattus and mice of the genus Mus bred for use in research, and horses not used for research purposes and other farm animals.. • PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (August 2002) • Animal = any live, vertebrate animals used or intended for use in research, training, testing or related purposes. • IACUC (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee) • Review and approve all animal use research proposals and manage animal care program at institution. • Accredited by Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC)

  7. Guiding Principles: 3R • Replacement: • using non-animal models or “lower” animals. • Reduction: • use methods aimed at reducing the numbers of animals needed. • Refinement: • eliminate or reduce unnecessary pain and distress.

  8. One needs to identify the benefits, then ensure that one is using only those animals you to use; that the numbers for each experiment are the minimum and that they are treated with care. John Martin from the Animal Ethics Advisory Committee (New Zealand) quoted in “Rise in animal testing in New Zealand,” tvnz.co.nz, September 11, 2007

  9. The Moral Challenge Complete abolition Anything goes Not practical, nor possible in foreseeable future Not humane, ignores obvious pain/suffering of animals

  10. The Moral Challenge Complete abolition Anything goes Not practical, nor possible in foreseeable future Not humane, ignores obvious characters of animals Neither of the extremes are ethical, nor reasonable, so….

  11. ? The Moral Challenge Complete abolition Anything goes Not practical, nor possible in foreseeable future Not humane, ignores obvious characters of animals Where is the middle ground?

  12. Three Areas of Concern • Moral status and welfare of animals in experimentation • Pain and suffering • Comparable benefits and suffering • Advocacy for animals • Oversight and attitudes • ‘outside’ groups • Changing the debate • Animal psychology/behavior • Animal models and transgenics

  13. Moral Status of Animals • Sentience vs. Sapience • Pain/suffering (sentience) is only principled way to distinguish those entities with/without moral status. • Animals feel pain/suffer, thus have interests, thus require equal consideration (not necessarily equal treatment). (Peter Singer) • Human suffering vs. Animal suffering • What is the proper balance between animal pain/suffering and human benefit?

  14. Animal Advocacy • Compliance and Oversight • In addition, proper care and treatment… • Those who oversee also those interested in the research… • ‘Outside’ Groups • Spies from PETA • Pressure from ALF

  15. Changing the Debate • Animal Psychology/Behavior • Research on animal psychology/behavior shows that animal cognition/behavior is more similar to human cognition/behavior than previously thought • What are the moral consequences of this changing view? • Animal Models and Transgenics • The more humanized the animal is the better model it makes. But, if animals are more like humans, shouldn’t this give us pause regarding the moral status of research animals? • Enhanced memory, cognition, aggression, nurturance, etc…. Transgenics for xenotransplantation…Chimeras: the “Human neuron mouse” • What is the significant modification that would prohibit or modify research on that animal model?

  16. Summary • The Ethical Challenge: • Finding a reasonable middle ground • Moral Status of Animals • Sentience vs. sapience • Advocacy • What role should ‘outside’ groups play? • How should research community respond? • Modifying animals • How do modifications to animals change the debate?

More Related