1 / 18

Nenad P relo g : Collaborative Media and "Cultural Sector" – Friends or Strangers

Nenad P relo g : Collaborative Media and "Cultural Sector" – Friends or Strangers. Intercultural Dialogue and Digital Culture November 2 1, 200 8. World Internet Usage. N ove m ber 21, 2008 . (9 am): World P opulation 6 , 715, 3 75,600 I nternet users 1,505,622,200 Penetration 22.42%.

garran
Télécharger la présentation

Nenad P relo g : Collaborative Media and "Cultural Sector" – Friends or Strangers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nenad Prelog:Collaborative Media and "Cultural Sector" – Friends or Strangers Intercultural Dialogue and Digital Culture November 21, 2008

  2. World Internet Usage • November 21, 2008. (9 am): • World Population 6,715,375,600 • Internet users 1,505,622,200 • Penetration 22.42%

  3. Development of Web Concept (1) • Web 1.0 (connected machines, nodes) • Provide the information flow • Browsers  insight into content • Description of content done through language • Routers, Protocols • Engineering, Computer Science

  4. Development of Web Concept (2) • Web 2.0 (connected people, network) • Interaction, collaboration, uploading, folksonomy • Social networks, Blogging, Wiki • User  Author • Sociology, Economy

  5. Development of Web Concept (3) • Web 3.0 (connecting of knowledge) • Semantic web, relations, artificial intelligence, natural language communication • Knowledge enhancing and improvement • Content, not descrip- tion of content • Psychology, Linguistics, Statistics

  6. Processes aresimultaneous • New phase in development dose not replace the older one! • Moving from material to virtual • From content to links • From products to services

  7. Content is there… • How to reach desired content? • More than 80% of visits start at some search engine! • Institutions in culture can not use the same techniques like commercial pages.

  8. But we are not… • Web sites of cultural institutions • Cultural portals  OR • Search engines • Indexes  OR • Social networks • Tagging

  9. Problems with Search Engines • Do 5 W questions function? – Who Who is the best known writer in Croatia (-) • What What listeners think about quality of repertoire (-) – Where Where is the biggest collection of impressionists in Croatia (-) – When When Ivo Andrić was born (+) • Why Why so few films are produced in Croatia (-)

  10. Are we creating for ourselves? • Which sources have priority, national or international? • What is more important; to work on Croatian edition of encyclopaedia, or English version?

  11. The Wiki as a Weapon of Mass Collaboration

  12. Comparison between quantity of content (measured in lines) in Wikipedia (Croatian and English version/edition) Croatian Academy of Arts and Sciences (CAAS) (members) (nonmembers)

  13. Literature (CAAS members) • (cro) (eng) • Ivan Aralica 60 25 • Nedjeljko Fabrio 25 - • Ivan Kušan 22 15 • Slobodan Novak 35 - • Luko Paljetak 40 - • Pavao Pavličić 35 3 • Goran Tribuson 35 70

  14. Literature (nonmembers) • (cro) (eng) • Slavenka Drakulić - 25 • Miro Gavran 40 - • Miljenko Jergović 30 8 • Predrag Matvejević 60 25 • Dubravka Ugrešić 40 40

  15. Sports • (cro) (eng) • Davor Šuker 40 180 • Janica Kostelić 250 90 • Goran Ivanišević 180 260 • Toni Kukoč 40 50 • Ivano Balić 20 15 • Blanka Vlašić 70 60

  16. Culture is not business • Popularity as the most important criteria for search presentation • Articles which are used stay • Trivialization of new media • The usage of collaborative media in promotion of culture is lagging behind possibilities it offers

  17. At the end (1) • Going to the start: • Web 1.0 provided insight into diversity • Information about culture • Web 2.0 provided possibility of reacting • Real answers are hard to find • More local content and languages • Easy to publish: diversity creation

  18. At the end (2) • Web 3.0 will provide convergence of real life and virtual space • From description of content to the content itself • Laws of one world function in another (and another way around)

More Related