1 / 20

Kristin M. Brown, H.I.T. June 5, 2013

Geochemical Modeling of Uranyl (UO 2 2+ ) Sorption to Ferrihydrite Colloids at a Colorado test site. Kristin M. Brown, H.I.T. June 5, 2013. Uranium in the environment. Uranium occurs naturally and is a common contaminant in the environment Anthropogenic Causes Weapons Production

garry
Télécharger la présentation

Kristin M. Brown, H.I.T. June 5, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Geochemical Modeling of Uranyl (UO22+) Sorption to Ferrihydrite Colloids at a Colorado test site Kristin M. Brown, H.I.T. June 5, 2013

  2. Uranium in the environment • Uranium occurs naturally and is a common contaminant in the environment • Anthropogenic Causes • Weapons Production • Nuclear Energy • Leaching from Mine tailings • Scientific/Other Uses

  3. What are colloids? • Colloids are very small particles • 1 mm or less in diameter • Important surface properties that larger particles do not

  4. Ferrihydrite colloid determination IN Lab • [FeII]gwfiltration [FeII]m solution • [FeII]gw – [FeII]m = [FeII]colloid • [FeII]gw + O2filtration [FeII]m2 • [FeII]gw– [FeII]m2 = [FeII]colloid oxide

  5. Uranium sorption Determination in lab [UVI]gw+ O2filtration [UVI]m2 [UVI]gw ≈ [UVI]m2 Laboratory Data: Uncertainty ± 10% [0.035mg/L] ≈ [0.0343mg/L]

  6. Laboratory data

  7. Conceptual Model • Colloids are present • Fe-Oxide Colloids are known to sorb to Uranium • Carbonate and Sulfate Uranium complexes are not charged and do not sorb. • Does UO22+ sorb in this system (i.e at the Colorado Test Site)?

  8. Hypothesis (i.e. The Story) • Uranium Ion Does Not Sorb to Ferrihydrite Colloids at the Colorado Test Site • The Model Basis was water data from the Colorado test site and the results were compared to the Laboratory Results

  9. Colorado Test Site

  10. Colorado Test Site • Between 1924-1958 the area hosted Vanadium and Uranium ore processing facilities and mill tailings • Uranium Mill Tailings located on a flood plain of the Colorado River • Groundwater flows through unconsolidated Quaternary floodplain deposits that are often coated by iron oxide minerals

  11. General site Model Not to Scale

  12. Basis water parameters

  13. Reactants • Run 1 – Initial pH set at 7.13 • Log fugacity slid from -6 to -1 • Run 2 – Log Fugacity held constant at -2.5 (an average groundwater value) • pH slid from 7.1 to 9.0

  14. Uo22+ versus fugacity co2Run 1

  15. Sorbed fraction vsphRun 1

  16. Sorbed fraction vsfCo2RUN 1

  17. Uo2 versus phRun 2 Fixed Log Fugacity (-2.5)

  18. RUN 2 – Sorbed Fraction VS pH

  19. Conclusions • Uranium sorption is highly dependent on the amount of carbonate in the system. • Based on the modeling and laboratory results Uranium sorption does not occur at the Colorado Test Site.

  20. Thanks! kbrown2@osmre.gov (303) 293-5048

More Related