1 / 5

Intelligence Integration for Training Transformation (I2T2) Working Group

Intelligence Integration for Training Transformation (I2T2) Working Group 31 March 2010. Mr. Hal Stine USJFCOM J-7. I2T2 Working Group Brief-back.

gary
Télécharger la présentation

Intelligence Integration for Training Transformation (I2T2) Working Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Intelligence Integration for Training Transformation (I2T2) Working Group 31 March 2010 Mr. Hal Stine USJFCOM J-7

  2. I2T2 Working Group Brief-back Purpose: To better synchronize and integrate a variety of Joint Intelligence Training initiatives, issues and concerns in the context of Training Transformation (T2) and the Joint Training System. The I2T2 Working Group (WG) provides a venue for Joint Intelligence Training (JIT) Program situational awareness and a means to align and deconflict JIT issues for presentation to senior T2 leadership. Discussion: WG objectives focused on the establishment of the I2T2 as an enduring working group of the WJTSC, followed by an overview of the intelligence training landscape that included the Defense Intelligence Training Enterprise (DITE), the Joint Forces Intelligence Training Council (JFITC) and the JIT Program as represented in relationship to the Joint Training System. Outcomes: The WG approved business rules, identified desired membership, and developed a standardized agenda. It was recognized that the Joint Forces Intelligence Training Council (JFITC) and the JIT Joint Management Office (JMO) would be a critical supporting elements to discuss Working Group agenda items between conferences. Integrated Operations Training: Discussions concluded that priorities, requirements and gaps associated with joint intelligence training and integrated operations was an inherent part of the overall WG effort. As the WG evolves, non-Department of Defense participation will be critical to long-term success. Intelligence training requirements for Irregular Warfare were discussed as an example of where this integration is currently taking place. Issues: None. However the WG identified a number of areas where issues needed to be developed for future presentation.

  3. Joint Logistics Education and Training Working Group 31 March 2010 Mr. Warren Bizub USJFCOM J-7

  4. Joint Logistics Education & Training (JLET) Working Group Brief-back • Purpose: To redefine Issue 09-010 and determine way-ahead for JLET Working Group (WG). • Discussion: • Briefed results of final draft Joint Logistics & Education Training Exercise Study • Joint Logistics Education and Training Updates • USTRANSCOM • Center for Joint & Strategic Logistics • USJFCOM Doctrine & Education Group • Outcomes: • Redefined the original issue as briefed during WJTSC 09-2, developed a way-ahead for achieving a set of standardized Joint logistics education and training requirements. • Integrated Operations Training: • Integrated operations training has always been a consideration of Joint logistics education and training. • Issues: No new issues.

  5. Joint Logistics Education and Training Briefer: Mr. Bizub Issue 09-010:Lack of an oversight structure to support the DOD Joint logistics education and training requirements. Discussion: In the past few years there has been a myriad of initiatives and studies that were consolidated in the Joint Logistics Education, Training, and Exercise Study (JLETES). There is no central authority providing oversight related to Joint Logistics education and training to influence the logistics learning continuum to shape the development of Joint logisticians.  This shortcoming has likely resulted in duplication of efforts, lost opportunities, and reduced support to combatant command Joint logisticians and makes the implementation of the 40+ recommendations made in the JLETES more challenging. Endstate: A validated set of Joint logistics education and training requirements. POA&M: Formally staff the JLETES with the Joint logistics community stakeholders and provide the results to theCenter for Joint and Strategic Logistics (CJSL) for assessment. OPR:JS J7 and J4, USJFCOM J7 OCR: Combatant Commands, Services, DUSD (L&MR),(CJSL) Aug 10 MAR 11 AUG 09 APR 10 MAR 10 Brief Staffing Results Initial Requirements List Briefed JLETES Established way-ahead Staff JLETES

More Related