130 likes | 270 Vues
Smart Grid Teleconferences – Jan-Mar 2011. Date: 26 January 2011. Abstract: NIST PAP#2 Status Australian Smart Metering UK Consultation. January 26 Meeting Topics. NIST PAP#2. Abstract:
E N D
Smart Grid Teleconferences – Jan-Mar 2011 Date: 26 January 2011 Abstract: NIST PAP#2 Status Australian Smart Metering UK Consultation Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
January 26 Meeting Topics Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
NIST PAP#2 Abstract: This work area investigates the strengths, weaknesses, capabilities, and constraints of existing and emerging standards-based physical media for wireless communications. The approach is to work with the appropriate standard development organizations (SDOs) to determine the characteristics of each technology for Smart Grid application areas and types. Results are used to assess the appropriateness of wireless communications technologies for meeting Smart Grid applications. http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Draft 0.5 July 28, 2010 August 4, 2010 Call for Input to Section 6 September 15, 2010 End of draft 0.5 review period SGIP face-to-face, St Louis Tentative PAP 2 meeting September 16, 2010 NIST Timeline (Anticipated) Schedule as of Jan 2011 September 30, 2010 Release of draft 0.6 October 29, 2010 End of draft 0.6 review period November 4, 2010 OpenSG + PAP2 meeting, Fort Lauderdale Extended edit period December 3, 2010 Release of Version 1 January 15, 2011 Continuation of project to extend findings Release of Version 2 June/July 2011 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Version 1.0 released Jan 13, 2011 • http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Objective3/NIST_PAP2_Guidelines_for_Assessing_Wireless_Standards_for_Smart_Grid_Applications_1.0.pdf Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
PAP#2 Report - Voting/Response guidelines • Vote response due date Friday Jan 28. • Vote/comments not required to be completed today am1 but can we agree on direction? • Allows up to 8 days to formulate response • Only yes/no vote expected. • Comments can be supplied if desired but there is no definitive or immediate plan to respond. Comments received will be archived for consideration during preparation of Version 2 report. • Lack of response is deemed to be acceptance. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Comment Collection 1. Member comments • The matrix V6-r1 supplied as part of the 802 commentary was not included • There is no technology specific Appendix for 802.15 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Recommendation – LA Outcome • Continue to solicit members to read and comment on PAP#2 Report V1 • Cconvene conf call Jan 26 to review comments and voting positions. 2. Further Consider voting options: • Yes with no comments • Yes with non-binding comments • No with willingness to change to Yes if certain conditions are met Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Australia • Australia has issued a call for candidates for their Smart Metering HAN • Responses from 802 should be provided • Probably best from individual WG, e.g 802.11, 802.15, 802.16 • http://share.aemo.com.au/smartmetering/default.aspx Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Australian HAN RFI • The schedule for the RFI is as follows: • 20 December 2010 Issue the RFI to standards organisations • 21 January 2011 Standards organisations to register their participation via email • 31 January 2011 Closing date for questions • 11 February 2011 Submissions due date • 14 to 25 February 2011 Preparation of initial evaluation and first draft of review to be sent to the BRWG • 28 February 2011 Issue RFI draft evaluation to the BRWG • 8-9 March 2011 First BRWG workshop review • 10-18 March 2011 BRWG's HAN Technical Group work (as required) • 5-6 April 2011 Final BRWG workshop review • 12 April 2011 Submission of the RFI report and Smart Metering Infrastructure Functionality Specification Change Control to the NSSC • 20 April 2011 NSSC meeting • May 2011 Issue HAN interface standard report to the MCE's SCO http://share.aemo.com.au/smartmetering/Pages/BRWG.aspx Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Question wording (due by Jan 31)-proposed • Proposed question #1 • Some portions of the HAN RFI can be read as a request for standards information while appear to be a system procurement specification. The technology contained in a complete Smart Metering HAN system cannot be provided by any single SDO and would need to be provided by a wide variety of Standards Organizations. • Standards created by IEEE such as those in the 802 family (e.g. 802.3, 802.11, 802.15, 802.16) contain specifications for only ISO layers 1 and 2. Layers 3 and 4 for protocols such as TCP/IP are provided by IETF. Several of the questions refer to transfer of smart metering protocol messages at layers 5-7 that would be contained in a higher level protocol specification developed by yet another organization outside IEEE 802 such as IEC 61850 or ZigBee and their Smart Energy Profile 2.0 (SEP 2.0). • Additionally, testing and certification is typically provided by a trade organization such as ZigBee , Bluetooth SIG, WiMAX, and the Wi-Fi Alliance. • We propose to explicitly answer a portion of the questions that relate to technology under our direct control and either respond with not applicable (N/A) or refer to other trade and technology sources for the remainder of the responses. • Do you have any comments on our approach? Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Group conclusion • Agreed that the revised question to Australia should be further developed by the 802 WGs and ideally sent as one question from the collective group. • If that approach is not feasible, at least expect each WG to submit a similarly worded question. • WG chairs will refine the language in time to respond by the Jan 31 deadline. Given the US - Australia time offset and that Jan 31 is Monday the 802 WGs completion date should be Friday Jan 28. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
UK Smart Metering http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/consultations/consultations.aspx Smart Metering Implementation Programme: prospectus status Formal written consultation has closed and is awaiting publication of the Government’s response. (1 of 21 consultations in similar state) UK aim is to provide a summary of public responses to consultation within three months of the closing date. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell