1 / 6

Informal Guidelines for the Mid-Term R eview

The Mid-Term Review serves as a crucial contractual obligation and a platform for fruitful dialogue among beneficiaries, associated partners, and research fellows. Attendance is mandatory, with a detailed report to be submitted at least one month advance. All recruited researchers must complete an online assessment questionnaire two weeks prior to the meeting. Key topics include project progress, training, and networking, while individual presentations will spotlight personal backgrounds and career impact expectations. The agenda will cover scientific objectives, research training programs, recruitment, and overall management strategies.

gauri
Télécharger la présentation

Informal Guidelines for the Mid-Term R eview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Informal Guidelines for the Mid-TermReview

  2. Mid-TermReview: A contractual obligation … and a fruitful dialogue • Representatives of eachbeneficiary and AssociatedPartners as well as all fundedfellowsmust attend the meeting • Mid-Termreview report to besubmittedat least 1 month in advance • At least 2 weeksbefore the Mid-TermReviewMeeting, all recruitedresearchersmustcomplete and submit the online Mid-TermAssessment questionnaire • Training activities / networking aspects important

  3. Progress report for mid-term of the project Mid-termreview report • Mid-Termreport shoulddemonstrate the achievementsin relation to the objectives defined in AnnexI • Overallprogressof the project / deliverables / recruitment / international conferences / events • Scientific publications, papers, patents, media coverage, etc., to beattached as separate annexes Questionnaires • A mid-termassessment questionnaire • ESRsShort presentation(15 min + 5 min) yourexperiences(background, research and training at the host institution and network wide, networking aspects, future plans) in the project

  4. Suggestion for Agenda • Introduction (10 minutes) by P.O. and Coordinator • Round table: briefpresentations by representatives of eachpartner • Coordinator’s Report (45 minutes): scientific, training, networking and management aspects • Fellows’ Individual Reports (20 minutes per fellow): presentyourself, your background, yourwork, your training experience in the network. Includeyour expectations on the possible impact of ARDENT on your future career • Meeting between the Fellows and the ResearchExecutive Agency Representative (30-60 minutes) • Open Discussion

  5. Issues to beconsidered 1. SCIENTIFIC • Is researchbeingfocused on the objectives set in Annex I? • Are all teams contributing to the project as foreseen and istherecooperationbetween the teams? 2. RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMME • In line withAnnex I, all ESRsintegrated in the project, networking, secondments, training, complementary training (e.g. language), associatepartnersinvolved in training and secondments, industryexposure?

  6. Issues to beconsidered 3. MC FELLOWS • All ESR recruited? Difficulties in recruitment? All ESR aware of theirrole, allowances, networking and secondment opportunities? 4. MANAGEMENT • Is organisation of network and distribution of tasks between teams adapted to the project? Has the Coordinator the necessary scientific and organisational competences? Is use made of modern communication means (web page, internet, etc)? Are rules (e.g. eligibility criteria, allowable costs) clear to everybody?

More Related