1 / 24

Plant Information Model (PIM) Breakout N1 – (1:00pm – 2:30pm), Monday, June 16, 2014

Plant Information Model (PIM) Breakout N1 – (1:00pm – 2:30pm), Monday, June 16, 2014. Russell Adams – EPRI Consultant Laurent Perkins, Bentley Kent Freeland, PK Energy. Breakout Topics. EPRI Plant Information Model (PIM) Industry PIM Team Initiatives

gayle
Télécharger la présentation

Plant Information Model (PIM) Breakout N1 – (1:00pm – 2:30pm), Monday, June 16, 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Plant Information Model (PIM)Breakout N1 – (1:00pm – 2:30pm), Monday, June 16, 2014 Russell Adams – EPRI Consultant Laurent Perkins, Bentley Kent Freeland, PK Energy

  2. Breakout Topics • EPRI Plant Information Model (PIM) • Industry PIM Team Initiatives • Other Industry Initiatives – Harmonization • Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative • Knowledge & Sharing

  3. EPRI Plant Information Model (PIM) • Evolving open source standard for information handover/turnover • Standard Handover Framework • Configuration Management (CM) Taxonomy and Relationship Traceability Frameworks • Eighty (80) percent usable for implementation of world class CM and Information Handover Solutions

  4. Industry PIM Team Initiatives • Standard Handover Framework • FCI Types / Doc Types • Properties / Attributes Data Dictionary • Configuration Management (CM) Taxonomy and Relationship Traceability Frameworks • CM Taxonomy • Defined Relationships

  5. Other Industry Initiatives - Harmonization • NIRMA - Nuclear Information & Records Management Association • Technical Guidance Document on Turnover of Records and Incremental Handover of Information for New Nuclear Power Plant “The What” • FIATECH • ISO 15926 Information Patterns (IIP) • Harmonizing Equipment Data (HEED) • Equipment Data and Conformance (EDRC) • Other Industries

  6. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative EPRI Plant Information Model (PIM) is part of this Initiative

  7. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Approach • Benchmarking • 9 Operating Nuclear Plants • 2 New Build Nuclear Plants • 3 International New Build Utilities • 3 Large High-Tech Data-Centric Non Power Industries • 4 Solution Providers • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

  8. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Approach (cont.) • Validate the costs to build a data centric model with different end states based on industry best practices • Use benchmarking to define the opportunity for savings and validate against other industry studies and experience • Create a Probabilistic Investment Model and validate results

  9. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Approach (cont.) • Prepare Use Cases based on different plant current states and desired end states • Independent Expert Panel that provides input on the model and challenges the assumptions.

  10. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Discovery • Decisions are made on data, not documents. Data must be centralized, accurate, change controlled, and easily accessible. • A “data-centric” CM system will provide a variety of plant activities with reliable, controlled data – the “single source of truth”. • Need to define the cost of installing and maintaining a data-centric system from different starting points.

  11. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Discovery (cont.) • Need to define both the “hard” and “soft” savings that a data-centric system has on the cost of operating and maintaining the plant. • The model accounts for the benefit of data accessibility used by Engineering, Licensing, Procurement, Operations, and Maintenance.

  12. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Discovery (cont.) • Potential End States – Each State Builds on the Prior State • Electronic Document Centralization • Documents -Tags Cross Referenced • Data Centralization • Relationship Model • 2D/3D Model Integration with data model • 2D/3D Model Authoring Tool Integration

  13. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Discovery (cont.) • Electronic Document Centralization • Master Document List (MDL) – “Critical Documents” in electronic format; all documents indexed in a centralized document control system • Documents -Tags Cross Referenced • Expand Master Equipment List (MEL) to include other tag types (piping components, cable #s, weld #s, relays, etc.) • Cross Reference Tags to Critical Documents

  14. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Discovery (cont.) • Data Centralization • Centralize siloed databases with the MEL Database • “Mine” and validate other mission critical data contained in documents • Relationship Model • Major Transition requiring moving from a “Tabular” data structure to an Object-Relationship data structure

  15. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Discovery (cont.) • Relationship Model (cont.) • Major Transition requiring moving from a “Tabular” data structure to an Object-Relationship data structure • Benefit: • Ability to build a lifecycle data model that relates licensing requirements to design to procurement to installation to O&M. • Ability to perform lifecycle impact reviews if anything is changed in the relationship “Chain”

  16. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Discovery (cont.) • Relationship Model (cont.) • Major Transition requiring moving from a “Tabular” data structure to an Object-Relationship data structure • The Relationships build Knowledge into the data structure by relating: • Licensing Requirements to Design Documents • Document Design Outputs to Document Design Inputs • Design Requirements to Asset Tests and Inspections

  17. Data-Centric CM and Asset Information Management Initiative Discovery (cont.) • 2D/3D Model Integration • Identify areas to be modeled and maintained • Create ability to view models • Hot Spot Tags for accessibility to data model • 2D/3D Model Authoring Tool Integration • Ability to conduct engineering design and analysis from the models and update data

  18. Knowledge & Sharing • SHARE and LEARN the WHAT, HOW and WHY • Facility Configuration Information (FCI) Management and Handover and/or Turnover during Major Projects • Handover is the transfer of “approved-for-use” information from an Engineering Procurement Construction (EPC) or Consortium entity to the Owner/Operator for use in pre-operational readiness activities. • Turnover is the official transfer of “as-built” and final information from an EPC or Consortium entity to the Owner/Operator for use in the operation and maintenance of the operating unit.

  19. Knowledge & Sharing (cont.) • SHARE and LEARN the WHAT, HOW and WHY • Information sets that are or would be part of Multi-dimensional Data Models and MEL databases, as well as traditional drawings, documents and records to help move the industry from a purely document-centric FCI model to a hybrid data-centric / document-centric approach.

  20. Knowledge & Sharing (cont.) • Owner Operator Questions • What have been your key successes (processes, procedures, strategies, automation) with respect to Handover and/or Turnover information exchange in support of Startup, Operations and Maintenance? • In recent major projects, how did you get information delivered to you and when was it delivered? • What would you change for future projects to improve information exchange?

  21. Knowledge & Sharing (cont.) • EPC, NSSS or Vendor Questions • What have been your key successes (processes, procedures, strategies, automation) with respect to vendor and contractor Handover and/or Turnover information exchange in support of Engineering, Procurement, and Construction? • In recent major projects, how did you deliver information to the owner and when was it delivered? • What would you change for future projects to improve information exchange?

  22. Questions

  23. Thank You

  24. ContactsRussell Adams Russell.H.Adams@gmail.comLaurent Perkins Laurent.Perkins@bentley.comKent Freeland Kent.Freeland@pk-energy.com

More Related