1 / 43

Researching Conversation: An Overview

Researching Conversation: An Overview. Psychology of Language COM 370 John R. Baldwin. All the Usual Suspects. Conversation Analysis Discourse Analysis What’s the “text” Level of detail? Main differences?. CA in more detail (Ten Have).

gehrke
Télécharger la présentation

Researching Conversation: An Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Researching Conversation:An Overview Psychology of Language COM 370 John R. Baldwin

  2. All the Usual Suspects • Conversation Analysis • Discourse Analysis • What’s the “text” • Level of detail? • Main differences?

  3. CA in more detail (Ten Have) • “Pure” CA: Concerned with the general issues, structure of talk “as such,” regardless of context, institution • “Applied” CA—courtrooms, meetings, interviews, and so on • Charles Antaki on Applied CA: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxTkOF-xcr8&feature=player_embedded#at=11

  4. CA: Three example studies • Sacks: Rules of conversational sequence, “natural next actions” versus “occasionally usables” (call-center study) rules for conversational sequence • Schegloff: Sequences in conversational openings (summonsanswer sequence) • S&S: Openings and closings: rules of adjacency pairs: “closing sections” (well…)

  5. Some Research Basics: CA • What are the underlying assumptions • Approach is: • Top-down? [theory  data]: Theory = lens • Bottom-up? [data  theory]: Theory = explanatory framework • Social structure can be seen: _________ • What counts as data? __________________ • Collecting data • Transcribing data

  6. Adjacency pairs • Two-utterance length • Adjacent positioning (though later this varies) • Different speakers produce each utterance (Schegloff & Sacks, in Ten Have, 1999) • “A close-ordering” of utterances which makes their use relevant for specific purposes

  7. Some types of adjacency pairs • Question answer • Greeting  greeting • Offer  acceptance/rejection • Compliment  acknowledgement (acceptance/rejection) • Request  grant (Clark & Clark, Ch. 6)

  8. Characterizing speech turns—some examples One List (Dore, 1975) • labelling • repeating • answering • requesting (action) • requesting (answer) • calling • greeting • protesting • practicing

  9. Studying Spanish? Not like this! • http://www.is.cs.cmu.edu/Clarity.Tagging.Manual/SAtags.html

  10. CA Steps: Overall Process (Ten Have, 1999) (Assuming you already have transcript) • Locate data fragment (“sequence”) • Analyze “interlocking organizations” • Turn-taking • Sequence • Repair • Turn construction/design • Take notes on transcript or notebook • Try to formulate general observations

  11. CA Steps: Interlocking Organization (Ten Have, 1999) 1. Turn-taking: • Gaps, pauses • Overlaps and Interruptions • Overlaps: • Continues the previous turn of the other (Person A continues) • Occurs at a TRP (Transition-Relevant Place) • Interruptions: • Takes turn away from other (Person B continues speaking) • Occurs NOT at a TRP • TCU: Turn-Constructional Unit • Indication of next turns [three rules, if naturally occurring conversation]

  12. CA Steps: Interlocking Organization (Ten Have, 1999) • Sequence: • Adjacency pairs • Relevant and accountable responses • Inserts; presequences; core sequences • Prefaces, summaries • Glosses; [summary for possible expansion] • Cycles (QA, jokes • Tags that anticipate answers, etc. • Recipient design!

  13. CA Steps: Interlocking Organization (Ten Have, 1999) • Repair: • trouble sources • self- and other-initiated repairs • NTRI: Next-turn repair initiator: huh? What? • TRPs: Transition-relevant places • “occasionally usable” repairs • “continuers” • misalignment

  14. CA Steps: Interlocking Organization (Ten Have, 1999) 4.Turn construction/design: • turn length • Address • “speaker design” • preference organization (what would typically follow, such as an apology) • turn shape: • Ex: acceptance versus rejection of an invitation • Ex: How does first pair part suggest second pair part?

  15. A Final (Possible) Step(Pomerantz & Fehr) • Implication of identities, roles, relationships • What do turns tell you about relationship of interactants? • What do you know about social structure, status (individual or group)? For example, does the text incorporate “gendered” identities (Note: you can only tell from the data, not from previous research on gender and communication!)

  16. An exercise • Choose a portion (segment) of the transcript given to you in class. We will listen to a video 3 times. • Use the transition notation to mark the text. • Use the notes to try to locate different organization patterns. • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eNF5hb6gzk

  17. Speech Act Theory • Grice’s Theory of Conversational Implicature • Maxims • Conversational Implicature • Searle’s Speech Act Theory • Locutionary (utterance), Illocutionary, and Perlocutionary forces • Five types of Speech Acts

  18. Discourse Analysis (Blum-Kulka) • Illocutionary Content • Cooperative Principle • Grice’s Maxims • Relation • Quality • Quantity • Manner

  19. Grice (continued) • Implicature • Conversational/conventional (we won’t distinguish) • Implied meaning of utterance: “How’s it goin’?” • Flouting (“exploitation”) of Grice’s maxims • Tautology: “Boys will be boys.” • Irony/sarcasm: “You look great, today!” • Exaggeration: “You look like death warmed over.” • Understatement: “It’s a tad cold out there.” • Overt lie: “Oh—it’s just something I threw on.” • Is it individual or shared?

  20. Application of Grice’s maxims—influenced by: • Context • Roles/status • [Relationship] • Culture

  21. Speech Acts Theory • Illocutionary Content • Types of linguistic “force” • Locutionary (content) • Illocutionary (intent) • Perlocutionary (force or effect)

  22. Speech Acts Theory Felicity conditions/constitutive rules • Propositional content • Preparatory conditions/situational rules • Sincerity conditions • Essential conditions

  23. Speech Acts Theory • Types of speech acts (p. 242) • Representative • Directive • Commissive • Expressive • Declarative • Miscommunication • Implicature (again!)

  24. Indirect speech acts • Transparency • Illocutionary • Propositional; • Conventionality thesis • Question preparatory conditions • Emphasize sincerity condition • Prediction of future act • Pragmatic duality • Conventional and unconventionalpoliteness

  25. Compare level of transcription with CA… • Locate adjacency pair • What happens in each turn (speech acts)? • Are Grice’s maxims observed or violated? • Does conversational implicature occur? Blum-Kulka, 1997, p. 44

  26. Politeness! • Save this reading! We will come back to the section on politeness later! • I mean… • Can you save this reading…? • Would you mind possibly saving this reading…? • Would you be able to save this reading…? • Would you be kind enough to save this reading…? • Perhaps it would be better to… • This section is not relevant now, but will be important later… • WOULD YOU JUST SAVE THIS FRIGGIN’ READING!?

  27. Other Approaches (Tracy, 1991)

  28. Two Examples • Evasions • Apologies

  29. Evasions • Types of evasions? • Type of research? (how do you know?( • Applications?

  30. Apologies • Form and function • Unambiguous: I’m sorry for eating your hamster (responsibility, regret, intention not to do it again) • Regret: I’m sorry about your hamster • Redirected responsibility: Well, someone left the hamster in the refrigerator • No wrongdoing: Well, that’s what hamsters are for, right?

  31. Apologies • When would you want a “full, canonical apology?” • When would you not? • When can the following not really be apologies? • Public official apologies • Legal court apologies • “I’m sorry, Mr. Smith is out of town until Monday”

  32. Nonverbal behavior and apologies • Lexical semantics: The Function of Apologies • Apologies, Excuses, Justifications, and Explanations • The parts of an apology (p. 205) • One-ups and one-downs • Syntax and the apology: • What are some ways we distance ourselves from apologies?

  33. 4. Pragmatics: Speech acts: What are the “felicity conditions” of an apology? (pp. 207-208) 5. Speech Event: How is an apology situated within a larger conversational event? • Register: • Genre: • Key: • Maxims? Speech Acts? Implicature?

  34. CA: Preferred 2nd-pair parts, etc. • Narrative analysis (rhetoric) • Apologies and sociolinguistics • Culture • Gender/sex 9. Textual analysis: Apology as document (more rhetoric)

  35. Apologies • Kanye West: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYqYB1UpAQQ • Tiger Wood: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs8nseNP4s0 • The apology song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZctK51RwK8A • Another apology song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tjyr90S1DmQ&feature=related • I didn’t mean it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5TKUonQLns

  36. Conversation Analysis: • Apologies in adjacency pairs

  37. http://adt.curtin.edu.au/theses/available/adt-WCU20030626.150323/unrestricted/09appendixAB.pdfhttp://adt.curtin.edu.au/theses/available/adt-WCU20030626.150323/unrestricted/09appendixAB.pdf

More Related