1 / 11

Management Science Department Survey Results 2006: Key Features & Priorities Analysis

Explore the significance and frequency of features in the Management Science Department's 2006 survey results, identifying top features by importance and performance scores. Prioritize action items based on the IP ratio, focusing on key areas such as salaries, research funds, faculty promotion, and more.

geoffrey-kirkland
Télécharger la présentation

Management Science Department Survey Results 2006: Key Features & Priorities Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. QIPM SURVEY RESULTS 2006 MANAGEMENT SCIENCE DEPARTMENT (NOW THREE DEPARTMENTS)

  2. Importance – Frequency Distribution Performance – Frequency Distribution

  3. Top ten features according to Importance score Top ten features according to Performance score

  4. Ranking of the features according IP ratio (a measure of priority for action)

  5. There are 8 features in the SE Quadrant (Priorities) • Salaries • Funds to support research • Promotion of contract faculty • Transparency of APT process • Classroom scheduling • GWSB websites • Department websites • Travel support

More Related