SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Comparative Analysis of Democratization prof. Fulvio Venturino

geona avatar
18 diapositives · 351 Views · Jun 29, 2012

Comparative Analysis of Democratization prof. Fulvio Venturino. Comparative Politics Principles of Democracy and Democratization Chapter 7: Electoral Systems. Elections for what?. Elections are used to choose heads of state heads of government members of the legislature.

Comparative Analysis of Democratization prof. Fulvio Venturino - slide 1
01 / 18Comparative Analysis of Democratization prof. Fulvio Venturino
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Comparative Analysis of Democratization prof. Fulvio Venturino
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Comparative Analysis of Democratizationprof. Fulvio Venturino Comparative Politics Principles of Democracy and Democratization Chapter 7: Electoral Systems

  2. Elections for what? • Elections are used to choose • heads of state • heads of government • members of the legislature

  3. What is relevant in an electoral system? • the electoral formula • the district magnitude • the ballot structure • the electoral thresholds

  4. Types of electoral formulas • Plurality (FPTP): the candidate who receives the most votes, but not necessarily the majority of the vote, wins the election • Majority: candidates win the office in a single round of voting by gaining a majority of the ballots cast; if this is not the case, a runoff round is held at a subsequent date with the top two finishers running • Proportional Representation (PR): the proportion of a party’s seats in the legislature reflects the strength of the party in the electorate

  5. District magnitude • Single-member district • Multi-member district • Multiple districts • Single national district

  6. Ballot structure • Choosing candidates • closed party list systems • open party list systems • Choosing parties • categorical systems • ordinal systems

  7. Electoral thresholds • Thresholds qualify parties to obtain representation in the legislature. They are an increasingly common way for PR systems to limit the entry of minor parties into legislatures • 2 percent: Israel • 5 percent: Germany and Belgium • 10 percent: Turkey

  8. So what? • Plurality systems involve • winner-takes-all formula • small district magnitudes • categorical ballot structures • Proportional representation systems involve • proportional formulae • large district magnitude • categorical ballot structures (on occasion ordinal ballots, as with STV

  9. The effects of electoral systems • The scholarly work on the effects of electoral systems has focused on • the relationship between electoral rules and the ideological polarization and size of political party systems • the tendency of electoral systems to impact voter turnout and citizen participation • the potential for electoral systems to affect the course of democratic development

  10. The effects on party system • Plurality systems provide for incentives for political moderation in the party system and the political system generally • Plurality systems tend to reduce the number of parties and hence promotes governmental stability

  11. The impact on voter choice and turnout 1 • Plurality systems encourage strategic voting, where voters prevent their least preferred choice from getting elected • Many voters under such conditions vote against their least preferred candidates, as opposed to voting for their most preferred • This ‘voting against’ behavior makes voters susceptible to negative campaigning

  12. The impact on voter choice and turnout 2 • Under PR there is a greater likelihood of electoral success for minor parties • Hence voter efficacy (the sense that one’s vote counts) and the incentives to cast ballots should increase • Thus, voter turnout is generally much higher in countries that use PR systems when compared to countries that use FPTP electoral rules

  13. Electoral systems and democratic transition • Many potential cases to test these theories • post-communist states in Central and Eastern Europe • post-authoritarian countries throughout Africa, Latin America, and Asia • countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan

  14. The relevance of electoral engineering for transitions • Encouragement of women’s representation • Promotion of interethnic accommodation in ethnically divided societies • Improvement of the citizens’ satisfaction with the political system

  15. The case of Alternative Voting (AV)

  16. AV logics

  17. AV in practice

  18. The advantages of AV • supporters from one ethnic group may choose moderate candidates associated with the other ethnic group ahead of radical candidates associated with their own ethnic group • candidates seek second preferences votes outside their own ethnic group, thus they have an incentive to adopt conciliatory or moderate stances on ethnically divisive issues • AV provides an incentive for parties to make post-election deals on divisive issues