1 / 17

Keith Matthews, Kirsty Blackstock, Kevin Buchan, Dave Miller and Mike Rivington

“Walking in others shoes” E xperience of using the DECOIN tools to characterise sustainability trade-offs in Scotland and the Cairngorms National Park. Keith Matthews, Kirsty Blackstock, Kevin Buchan, Dave Miller and Mike Rivington. The Need for New Tools.

gerard
Télécharger la présentation

Keith Matthews, Kirsty Blackstock, Kevin Buchan, Dave Miller and Mike Rivington

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Walking in others shoes”Experience of using the DECOIN tools to characterise sustainability trade-offs in Scotland and the Cairngorms National Park Keith Matthews, Kirsty Blackstock, Kevin Buchan, Dave Miller and Mike Rivington

  2. The Need for New Tools • Overly simplistic single indicators - monomania • Ad hoc frameworks of incoherent metrics – fail to deliver understanding of trade-offs or relative performance • Methods compatible with multiple dimensions of values/costs • Beyond GDP agenda(s) • Questioning the role of growth • Well being • Global challenges – climate change, biodiversity

  3. SMILE Innovations • Systemic - not ad hoc – but still limits on social dimension • Multi-scale – explanatory and contextual - dependencies • Multi-metric – but coherent • Key factors, people, money, energy and land • Extents and intensities combined – avoids Jevons Paradox • Feasible? • Communicable? • Useful?

  4. CNP case study • Both an area of land and a new institution for rural sustainable development. • Assist the CNPA and their partners in delivering the aims of the National Park (Scotland) Act • Transferability of the DECOIN tools • Utility of the DECOIN tools

  5. CNP and other Institutions

  6. SUMMA Ag Sector Analysis • Part of co-funding from SG programme • National scale analysis (n+1) • CNP (n) • Time series 1991, 2001, 2007 (at time most recent) • Ag sector well documented – down to small units (IACS/JAC) • Significant as land area (CNP ~ 47% in IACS – most RGR) • Significant policy area

  7. SUMMA – ScotAG and CNPAG

  8. Emissions Extents – CNPAGand ScotAG

  9. Emissions Intensities – CNPAGand ScotAG

  10. SUMMA Emergy Analysis

  11. MuSIASEM – concepts • Multi-scale and integrated analysis • Mixtures – “opening up the box” – components of averages • Sectors: Societal Average (SA), Households (HH), Paid Work (PW), productive, service and government, agriculture (PS+SG+AG) etc • Regions, NUTS, local authority, intermediate, data zones • Land types • Time series, trajectories • Extents and Intensities together

  12. Metrics – the building blocks • GVA – gross value added (£) • THA – total human activity (population) THAHH, THAPW, THAPS, THASG, THAAG • TET – total energy throughput • TAL – total available land • Exosomatic Metabolic Rate - EMR = TET/THA • Economic Labour Productivity - ELP = GVA/THA • Not GVA/TET ! – or Subsistence = Industry

  13. Fund-Flow Diagrams

  14. Strengths and Weaknesses • SUMMA – up steam and downstream = trade-offs • Emergy – effective summary of resource use • Multi-scale – useful comparisons/standards • Dependence on developers – towards a software tool? • MuSIASEM – inclusion of population as a key factor • Decomposition – opens up the box – • Fund-flow – novel way to explore extents and intensities • Strongly empirical – adds to credibility but data dependent • Both coherent and integrative but deal less well with social aspects of sustainability (non-consumption)

  15. Implications for Mainstreaming • Implementation gap to use with stakeholders • How to communicate in succinct and accessible but not over simplify • Transparency data, assumptions and methods • Challenge to orthodox views and vested interests – but the beyond GDP agenda gains ground beyond the Anglo-Saxon “periphery” • Mainstreaming means using the tools with rather than for stakeholders – new research processes • Will continue to use DECOIN tools in our research programme but not always comfortable “walking in other’s shoes”.

More Related