290 likes | 513 Vues
Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review. January 21, 2010. Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations. Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations. Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations.
E N D
Nantucket Planning Office2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010
Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations
Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations
Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations
Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations
Article 39: Appleton Road RC-2 to LUG-3 or VTEC • Residentially developed • Located in COD • Surrounded by open space • LUG-3 would allow for modest ground cover expansion • VTEC would allow for significant ground cover expansion and limited commercial uses
Article 40: Fairgrounds Road, Old South Road, and Tom’s Way RC-2 to CN, R-5, and/or CTEC
Article 40: Fairgrounds Road RC-2 to CN and R-5 • TON owned land • CN portion programmed for government functions • R-5 portion programmed for housing
Article 40: Old South Road RC-2 to CN • Contains mixed uses • Generally meets CN standards • Connects to other CN areas • Average lot size = 10,580 square feet • Average ground cover ratio = 22.1%
Article 40: Tom’s Way to R-5, CN, or CTEC • Residential in character • Meets R-5 standards • Lack of infrastructure to support commercial development • Median lot size = 7,840 square feet • Median ground cover ratio = 13.34%
Article 41: West Miacomet Road and Somerset Road RC-2 to R-10
Article 41: West Miacomet Road and Somerset Road RC-2 to R-10 • Residential in character • Adjacent to R-10 district • Generally meets R-10 standards • Average lot size = 29,620 square feet • Average ground cover ratio = 8.2%
Article 43: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside West LUG-2 to LUG-1 and R-40
Article 43: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside West LUG-2 to LUG-1 and R-40 • Recommended in Surfside Area Plan • R-40 portion in TOD • LUG-1 portion in COD • Potential for 5 new lots • Ground cover expansion possible on all lots
Article 43: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside West LUG-2 to LUG-1 and R-40 • LUG-2 to LUG-1 • Average lot size = 77,754 square feet • Average ground cover ratio = 3.1% • LUG-2 to R-40 • Average lot size = 43,124 square feet • Average ground cover ratio = 4.4%
Article 44: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside South LUG-2 to LUG-1
Article 44: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside South LUG-2 to LUG-1 • Recommended by Surfside Area Plan • Adjacent to LUG-1 district • Potential for 5-6 new lots • Ground cover expansion for most lots • Average lot size = 46,700 square feet • Average ground cover ratio = 6.2%
Article 44: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside South LUG-2 to LUG-1 • Adjacent to LUG-1 district • Will correct zoning non-conformities • Will allow the TON to create one additional lot • Median lot size = 56,628 square feet • Median ground cover ratio = 1.9%
Article 45: Somerset Road and Somerset Lane LUG-2 to R-40 and COD to TOD
Article 45: Somerset Road and Somerset Lane LUG-2 to R-40 and TOD to COD • Located in TOD • Adjacent to R-20, R-10, CN, and RC-2 districts • Ground cover expansion possible • Lot division potential through ANR • Average lot size = 83,852 square feet • Average ground cover ratio = 3.8%
Article 46: Monomoy LUG-1 to VR • Will correct non-conformities • Located in COD • Adjacent to VR district • Potential for 1 new lot • Ground cover expansion possible • Average lot size = 31,014 square feet • Average ground cover ratio = 8.5%
Article 47: Intensity Regulations – R-5 • Amends side yard setback for the R-5 district only • Side yard setback of 10’ on one side can be reduced if: • A secondary dwelling or other accessory structure is located within 20 feet of the rear property line; or • Where a common driveway easement of at least 10 feet provides access to 2 or more lots
Article 48: Secondary Dwellings Citizen Article • Intent is to reduce the scalar separation requirement of 12 feet between the primary and secondary dwelling • Includes 2 options: • Reducing the requirement to 10 feet • Removing the requirement • Both options require amendment to definition of breezeway
Articles 49 and 50: Open Space Requirements for MRD and Cluster Subdivisions • Intent is to redefine the open space requirement for MRD and Cluster subdivisions • Includes 2 amendments: • Adding a minimum upland requirement • Adding a standard of review for the open space parcel