1 / 11

FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP #81

FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP #81. MTAC Report May 6, 2004. MAJOR TOPICS COVERED. Simplified Mail Prep Proposal Full Merging of Non-AFSM 100 Flats APPS Issues: 1 Address Block 2 OEL Update 3 “Clear” strapping and shrinkwrap Rename packages to bundles

germane-craft
Télécharger la présentation

FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP #81

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATIONWORK GROUP #81 MTAC Report May 6, 2004

  2. MAJOR TOPICS COVERED • Simplified Mail Prep Proposal • Full Merging of Non-AFSM 100 Flats • APPS Issues: 1 Address Block 2 OEL Update 3 “Clear” strapping and shrinkwrap • Rename packages to bundles • Cost-based rates market research

  3. SIMPLIFIED MAIL PREP PROPOSAL • Presented by Gary Hegsted • Issue: adapt mail preparation for AFSM 100 • Consider bypass of SPBS, APPS • Orient mail on pallets for manual offloading • Less shrinkwrapping and strapping • Consider standard package sizes • Applies to 3DG, SCF, ADC, BMC pallets

  4. SIMPLIFIED MAIL PREP PROPOSAL • Mailers save materials • USPS reduces work hours • Mail pieces need fewer handlings • Concerns: differences from SPBS, APPS requirements • Concerns: pallet integrity • Concerns: skills required in mail production • Concerns: software modifications

  5. SIMPLIFIED MAIL PREP PROPOSAL • Could fit in to future flats processing • Further testing needed • Looking for a test facility • Not expected to be ready for next rate case

  6. FULL MERGING OF NON-AFSM 100 FLATS • Presented by Neil Berger • Creates more pallet options • Non-automation mail to bypass machines • No “5% rule” for this situation • Federal Register notice issued • Comments needed by May 26

  7. APPS ISSUES: ADDRESS BLOCK • Presented by Barry Walsh • Visibility of address block has been required in DMM • Clarification to define that in terms of readability • Upcoming Federal Register notice • Linked to OEL revisions • Linked to issue of clear strapping and shrinkwrap

  8. APPS ISSUES: OEL UPDATE • Revised proposal unchanged • Based on 30 character line length • Includes backup designation of package types • Allows room for ACS codes • USPS tests needed before final requirements definition • Federal Register notice eventually

  9. APPS ISSUES: CLEAR STRAPPING AND SHRINKWRAP • Term “clear” needs definition • Includes issues of welds, seams, bubbles • USPS Engineering has been testing • Industry seeks greater involvement • Concern about costs of materials • Concern about Federal Register notice too early in process • USPS will facilitate industry participation • Barry Walsh: 202-268-7595

  10. RENAME PACKAGES TO BUNDLES • Presented by Cheryl Beller • Current term “packages” is confusing • Had earlier eliminated concept of packages being combined to make bundles • Now want to change references to packages as strapped or wrapped mail pieces to “bundles” • Packages would be akin to parcels • Put in DMM, gradual transition for other references

  11. COST-BASED RATES MARKET RESEARCH • Presented by Cheryl Beller • For Periodicals and Standard, begin with Standard • Avoid conflict with complaint case in Periodicals • Mailers could access scenarios • Mailers would forecast responses to new rate structure using supplied “non-final” rates • Consistent with simpler rules for small mailings

More Related