1 / 31

Role of The Facilitator

Role of The Facilitator. Presented by: Prof. Dr. Hoda El-Talawy Prof. Dr. Hala Salah. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project. First Session. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project. Objectives.

ghada
Télécharger la présentation

Role of The Facilitator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Role of The Facilitator Presented by: Prof. Dr. Hoda El-Talawy Prof. Dr. Hala Salah October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  2. First Session October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  3. Objectives • To be familiar with and to use the handbook • To apply consistently the role of the facilitator • To optimize the contribution to the capacity building • To facilitate DS process • Upon request, to make further contributions to the development of the process and its continuing improvement.

  4. Agenda • Identification of the Developmental Engagement. • Purpose of the site visit. • Judgments • Personal specifications of the facilitator • Roles and activities of the facilitator. • Challenges. • Working group. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  5. Phases of implementation of Egyptian QAA system 1- Transitional phase • Projects of IQAS • Developmental Engagement Phase 2- Accreditation phase October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  6. Developmental Engagement To provide an opportunity for institutions to develop and test the effectiveness of their both quality system and solidity of their system. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  7. Purposes and outcomes of Developmental Engagements • Developmental engagement will take place during the transitional period. • Institutions use the opportunity to evaluate their quality assurance systems. • Institutions are invited to participate in the developmental engagement by submitting an annual self-evaluation report. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  8. Developmental Engagement • Will be conducted during the transitional period. • Will not lead to accreditation. • The outcome will not be used directly to determine accreditation at later stage. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  9. Developmental EngagementFramework • Academic Programmes • Intended learning outcomes • Curriculum • Student assessment • Student achievement • Quality of Learning opportunities • Teaching and learning • Student support • Learning resources • Research and other scholarly activities • Community Involvement • Effectiveness of Quality Management and Enhancement October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  10. Guidelines on the planning for the site-visit • Initial planning in the institution. • The institution and the agency will consider the time of the site-visit. • Agency will compose the provisional team and approved by the Faculty. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  11. Preliminary visit • To confirm the arrangements. • To provide the initial feedback on the adequacy of the evaluative information. • To confirm the supporting documentation to be available. • TO agree on the timetable for the site-visit based on the typical timetable. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  12. Preliminary visit (CONT.) • To agree on the logistics including base room for the visiting reviewers. • To ensure that the facilitator understands the methods and to brief him on his role. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  13. Judgments • Using the criteria for the accreditation (annex p) . • The judgments under each heading will be either to confirm that the institution has meet the criteria or further improvement is required to meet the criteria. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  14. Outcomes of Developmental Engagement • The outcomes of each developmental engagement is a set of conclusions agreed by the visiting review team, conveyed in an oral feed back at the end of the site-visit and supported by a detailed review report which will remain confidential. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  15. Arrangements for further improvements • The institution will be responsible for preparing its action plan for further improvement. • The action plan will be informed by its mission, the report of the peer reviewer and the published criteria of the Agency . October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  16. GOOD LUCK October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  17. Second Session October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  18. ? Who is the facilitator October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  19. The facilitator • Academic staff • Institution • Working with • Approach Loyalty October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  20. Personal specifications Characteristics Team work skills Knowledge & experience of QA initiatives Commitment for the review process Mission, engagement in developments, methods of working October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  21. Roles and activities during planning of the site visit Ensures Verify Documents Time table Attend Preliminary meeting October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  22. Cont Roles and activities during planning of the site visit Support Logistics Accommodation Base room Documentation Meeting rooms Photo copying Refreshment October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  23. Roles and activities during the site visit Meeting attendance Review team Reviewers & academic staff Final oral feedback But, he will not attend - Peer review & students - Peer reviewer & other stakeholders - Final meeting of review team October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  24. Cont. Roles and activities during the site visit Significance of meeting attendance • Clarification on matters addressed in or omitted Understanding of line of enquiries • Matters • context of the institution’s activities October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  25. Cont. Roles and activities during the site visit • Must be passive on the range of evaluation bias Co Pitfalls Speculating outcomes Divulgence. Results October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  26. Role of the facilitator following the site visit Preparation of the institution’s evaluation Documents-T.T.-Stakeholders FSM_ logistics\ October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  27. Summary October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  28. The facilitator role • Documentation • Logistics • Clarification of any contextual matters • Meeting attendance • Debrief the institutions after the site visit • Evaluate the process Loyalty October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  29. Thank you October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  30. Group Exercises October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Projects

More Related