Download
peanut response to warrant acetochlor n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Peanut Response to Warrant (Acetochlor) PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Peanut Response to Warrant (Acetochlor)

Peanut Response to Warrant (Acetochlor)

150 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Peanut Response to Warrant (Acetochlor)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Peanut Response to Warrant (Acetochlor) E.P. Prostko*, T.L. Grey, and D.L. Jordan

  2. U.S. Planted Acres – 2012(X 1000) NASS June 29, 2012

  3. PPI/PRE Sonalan Prowl/Pendimax Dual Magnum/Generics Outlook/Propel Pursuit Spartan Charge Solicam Strongarm Valor POST Aim (Harvest Aid) Gramoxone Inteon/Firestorm/Parazone Basagran Ultra Blazer Cadre/Impose Classic Cobra Poast/Poast Plus Pursuit Select/Arrow/Trigger Storm 2,4-DB The Peanut Weed Control Toolbox19 active ingredients

  4. tested under experimental MON 63410 • capsule suspension formulation (micro-encapsulated) • 3CS • Acetochlor + safener = Harness or Surpass • First mention in literature was in 1970 (A new selective herbicide: MON 097, PROC NCWCC 25:56-59) • Currently labeled for use in cotton, soybeans, field corn, grain sorghum • MOA = 15 • Very long chain fatty acid inhibitor • Same MOA as metolachlor (Dual)

  5. Microencapsulation • small herbicide particles surrounded by polymer shell suspended in carrier

  6. Warrant is not Lasso!!!!

  7. Objective • To evaluate the tolerance of peanut to various applications of Warrant (acetochlor) under weed-free conditions.

  8. Materials and Methods – IGeneral • Small-plot techniques • Locations (4) • Georgia • Ty Ty, Plains • North Carolina • Rocky Mount, Lewiston • 4 replications • weed-free • Irrigated • ANOVA • LSD (0.05)

  9. Materials and Methods – II Locations *R/B = rip and bed

  10. Materials and Methods – IIITreatments • PPI, PRE, EPOST, POST • Warrant @ 3 or 6 pt/A • Dual Magnum @ 1.33 pt/A • EPOST • Gramoxone Inteon @ 12 oz/A + Storm @ 16 oz/A + • Warrant @ 3 pt/A or • Dual Magnum @ 1.33 pt/A • POST • Cadre @ 4 oz/A + • Warrant @ 3 pt/A or • Dual Magnum @ 1.33 pt/A

  11. Results

  12. Influence of PPI Treatments on Peanut Yield (lbs/A) LSD (0.05) Ponder = 354 Plains = NS Rocky Mount = 748 Lewiston = 864

  13. Influence of PRE Treatments on Peanut Yield (lbs/A) -7.2% LSD (0.05) Ponder = 354 Plains = NS Rocky Mount = 748 Lewiston = 864

  14. Influence of EPOST Treatments on Peanut Yield (lbs/A) LSD (0.05) Ponder = 354 Plains = NS Rocky Mount = 748 Lewiston = 864

  15. Influence of POST Treatments on Peanut Yield (lbs/A) -7.2%, -8.1% LSD (0.05) Ponder = 354 Plains = NS Rocky Mount = 748 Lewiston = 864

  16. Influence of EPOST Gramoxone/ Storm on Peanut Yield (lbs/A) -9.6% LSD (0.05) Ponder = 354 Plains = NS Rocky Mount = 748 Lewiston = 864

  17. Influence of POST Cadre Treatments on Peanut Yield (lbs/A) -9.7% LSD (0.05) Ponder = 354 Plains = NS Rocky Mount = 748 Lewiston = 864

  18. Peanut Response to Warrant @ 6 pt/APPI or PRE NTC PPI PRE* Ponder July 25 77 DAP

  19. Peanut Response to Warrant @ 6 pt/AEPOST OR POST NTC EPOST (18 DAP) POST (36 DAP)* Ponder July 25 77 DAP

  20. Summary • No yield loss from any treatment at Plains, Rocky Mount, or Lewiston • Significant yield loss at Ponder from …… • Warrant @ 6 pt/A – PRE and POST (7.2-7.4%) • Dual Magnum @ 1.33 pt/A – POST (8.1%) • Gramoxone Inteon + Storm + Dual Magnum – EPOST (9.6%) • Cadre + Warrant (3 pt/A) – POST (9.7%)

  21. Questions? www.gaweed.com