1 / 27

Don’t Ask-Don’t Tell Implications

Don’t Ask-Don’t Tell Implications. ' Hardball with Chris Matthews ' for Monday, December 20th, 2010 (excerpt)

ghita
Télécharger la présentation

Don’t Ask-Don’t Tell Implications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Don’t Ask-Don’t Tell Implications 'Hardball with Chris Matthews' for Monday, December 20th, 2010 (excerpt) REP. BARNEY FRANK (D), MASS: …Getting rid of “Don’t ask, don’t tell” basically gets rid of one of the major discriminatory laws on the books.  And it has broader implications because what it says is to America is, You know what?  Gays and lesbians can serve in the military.  And if you can do that, you can do anything because of the skills and the courage that that takes. CHRIS MATTHEWS:  ... what you said about DADT because I‘ve always been trying to figure out, growing up as you and I did in the years since World War II, how certain ethnic groups were able to get through.  Catholics and Jews, to a large extent, became much more assimilated because of their service in World War II, which was so … integrated, if you will, in the main battles.  And now, if you have gay men and women who are involved in defending the country, that creates another new revolution of assimilation where people are recognized for having done what they‘ve been allowed to do. FRANK:  No, it’s absolutely right…

  2. Vice President Biden: Same-sex marriage is as 'inevitable' as Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal

  3. Galatians Summary Outline • Ch 1-2: Defense of Message and Messenger • Ch 3-4: Grace-Faith versus Law-Works • Ch 5-6: New Life in the Spirit

  4. Ch 3-4: Grace-Faith versus Law-Works • 3:1-9 The Preeminence of Faith • 3:10-14 The Curse of Works • 3:15-18 The Precedent of Promise • 3:19-25 The Purpose of the Law • 3:26-4:7 Sons and Heirs through Christ • 4:8-18 The Emptiness of Legalism • 4:19-31 Law and Grace Cannot Coexist

  5. “The Test Question” Believing what was heard “observing the law”?

  6. “promises” evpaggeli,a EPANGELIA “gifts graciously bestowed without negotiation” (Merryman) “the plural is used because the one promise to Abraham was variously repeated”

  7. “Seed” vs. “Seeds” Donald Campbell “The stress on seed, not seeds, was made simply to remind the readers that the faithful in Israel had always recognized that blessing would ultimately come through a single individual, the Messiah.”

  8. Galatians 3:17 “A covenant having been confirmed before by God [to Christ] the after-four-hundred-and-thirty-years-having-come-into-being law does not annul, so as to abolish the promise.”

  9. Galatians 3:17 “A covenant having been confirmed before by God [to Christ] the after-four-hundred-and-thirty-years-having-come-into-being law does not annul, so as to abolish the promise.”

  10. Galatians 3:17 “A covenant having been confirmed before by God [to Christ] the Mosaic Law does not annul, so as to abolish the promise.”

  11. “confirm beforehand” prokuro,w PROKUROŌ

  12. “confirm beforehand” prokuro,w PROKUROŌ kuro,w KUROŌ to make valid to confirm publicly or solemnly; to ratify

  13. “confirm beforehand” prokuro,w PROKUROŌ kuro,w KUROŌ to make valid to confirm publicly or solemnly; to ratify PRO/KUROŌ before/ratify or make valid

  14. “annul” v 15 avqete,wATHETEŌ from Vine’s: “to put as of no value, …hence to act…as though it were annulled”

  15. “annul” v 15 avqete,wATHETEŌ from Vine’s: “to put as of no value, …hence to act…as though it were annulled” v 17 avkuro,w AKUROŌ

  16. “annul” v 17 avkuro,w AKUROŌ A/KUROŌ not/ratify or make valid

  17. “annul” v 17 avkuro,w AKUROŌ A/KUROŌ not/ratify or make valid to render void in sense of depriving of force and authority

  18. “make of no effect” katarge,w KATARGEŌ

  19. “make of no effect” katarge,w KAT/ARGEŌ KATA ARGEŌ

  20. “make of no effect” katarge,w KAT/ARGEŌ KATA ARGEŌ (various)to be inactive or idle

  21. KATARGEŌ Gal 5:4 NKJV “have become estranged” KJV “is become of no effect” NASB “have been severed” NIV “have been alienated”

  22. KATARGEŌ Gal 5:4 NKJV “have become estranged” KJV “is become of no effect” NASB “have been severed” NIV “have been alienated” Gal 5:11 NKJV/KJV “has [is] ceased” NASB/NIV “has been abolished”

  23. KATARGEŌ Gal 3:17 NKJV/KJV “make of no [none] effect” NASB “nullify” NIV “do away with”

  24. “make of no effect” katarge,w KAT/ARGEŌ KATA ARGEŌ down (Vine’s)to be inactive or idle “to reduce to inactivity; to render useless”

  25. v 15: avqete,wATHETEŌ “annuls; disannuleth; set[s] aside” v 17: avkuro,w AKUROŌ “annul; disannul; invalidate; set aside” katarge,w KATARGEŌ “make of no [none] effect; nullify; do away with”

  26. Galatians 3:17 James Boice “The difference is of no consequence from the viewpoint of Paul’s argument, because his point depends only on the historical sequence. If God had been blessing Abraham and his posterity through the way of promise for 430 years and if he was to do the same for all men through Christ and his posterity, how could the giving of the law annul this promise? It could not, as even the human analogy of covenants and wills shows. Therefore the law cannot add to, nor subtract from, God’s first and only way of salvation.”

  27. Galatians 3:15-18 Synopsis Ron Merryman “Though God gave both the Promise and the Law, He in no way was suggesting by adding the latter to the former that His normative method of dealing with men (the grace-promise method) was altered….That the Law should alter of annul the Promise or change God’s grace method of dealing with men was in no way God’s intent or purpose in giving it.”

More Related