1 / 23

Mediasite Pilot Presentation to UTFAB

Discover the capabilities of Mediasite, a device for capturing lectures and creating on-demand video resources. See how it has positively impacted students' learning experiences.

gilbertoc
Télécharger la présentation

Mediasite Pilot Presentation to UTFAB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mediasite Pilot Presentationto UTFAB Sally Hibbitt, ACNS/CTSS Nov. 18, 2008

  2. VideocastingAudio, Video, Visuals Definition of Terms Mediasite device for capturing lectures Podcasting Audio only

  3. Mediasite Capabilities • Captures components of lecture • Audio • Motion video • Visual presentation from computer (PowerPoint, any other program being displayed) • Keeps all 3 sources synchronized • Displays 2 windows within 1 screen • Watch presenter • View slides • View both

  4. Mediasite Capabilitiescont. • Capture and archive for on-demand playback: • from central server • Capture and store: • on a jump drive - files are approximately 1MB/min • on CD or DVD (internal burner is provided in device) • Stream session live

  5. Samples • MECH 530: Don Radford http://mediasite.colostate.edu/Mediasite/Viewer/?peid=154ce5baeb3347e5bdb2a761e25431a8 • CS 475: Sanjay Rajopadhye http://mediasite.colostate.edu/Mediasite/Viewer/?peid=e9a6e6c5aa894a2399be97579f633b2d • SPCM 200: Student speeches http://mediasite.colostate.edu/Mediasite/Viewer/?peid=a391d42b363d4ee0adf919a203d71dcb

  6. Year 1 Course Recordings • 101B NESB: CIVE 520, MECH 530, CS 575, CIVE 516, MECH 411 • A206 Clark: MECH 431, SPCM 346, CIVE 522 • Portable device: SPCM 200 (4 sections)

  7. Year 1 Budget Expenditures • 2 Mediasite recorders $43,406 • 2 Vaddio camera systems $ 9,321 • Monitors $ 3,299 • Installation hardware/materials $ 346 • Technicians $ 2,580 _________________________________ TOTAL $58,952

  8. Year 1 University Contribution • Staff time (summer 07/fall 07/spring 08) • ACNS staff: 275 hours • DCE staff: 315 hours

  9. Survey Results • Conducted fall and spring semesters surveys • Students positive responses to resource • Instructor feedback • Positive comments

  10. Student Feedback • Why did you watch the lecture? • Missed the class 43% • Went to class but didn’t understand a concept from the class 34% • Went to class but needed to review content for an exam 51%

  11. Student Feedback • How much benefit did you get from this resource? • No real benefit 0% • Some benefit 38% • A substantial amount of benefit 62%

  12. Student Feedback • Did having these resources change your class attendance habits? • Yes 17% • No 83%

  13. Student Feedback • Which statements are most accurate about your attendance in a class offering video lectures as an on-line resource? • I went to class because watching video is not a substitute 60% • I missed a few classes but was less stressed because I knew I could catch up by watching the video 43% • I skipped more classes because I could watch the video 4%

  14. Student Feedback • Which of the following apply to you? • The video helped me improve my understanding of content and possibly improve my grade 81% • Video made it convenient to catch up if I did miss class 57% • I attended class regularly and/or understood the content and did not have a need to view video 4%

  15. Student Feedback • Would you like to see more of your instructors offer course materials as a video resource? • Yes 96% • No 4%

  16. Student Feedback • The cost of this technology for the first year averaged out to be approximately $1.50/student for the semester. Should additional student tech fees be used to make it possible to offer more video resources? • Yes 82% • No 18%

  17. Faculty Feedback “Overall, I think Mediasite was WONDERFUL!... I can’t even begin to tell you how much better these recordings appear and sound! The old VHS ones often seemed distorted, so the Mediasite ones were such a nice improvement!... Students have been watching them…I can tell because their self-evaluations of their speeches are much more detailed and accurate. I would strongly recommend that we either continue with the pilot study or try to put this into standard practice.” -Hollie Petit SPCM 200

  18. Faculty Feedback “I think it is great that CTSS is doing this and I hope I will get a chance to do this at least one more time to fix my bugs. I have added a lot to this course and some of it has ample room for improvement.” -Wim Bohm CS 575

  19. Year 2 Course Recordings(currently for fall 08) • 101B NESB: CIVE 520, MECH 532, CS 475, ENGR 510 • A206 Clark: MECH 431, STAT 511, SOC 461

  20. Year 2 University Contribution Mediasite portable recorder & server software maintenance renewal $ 8,491 Staffing $24,000 ___________________________________ TOTAL $32,491

  21. Year 2 Request to UTFAB • Mediasite rack-mounted recorder maintenance renewals • 2 @ $3,705 $7,410 • Part-time staffing $4,000 __________________________________________ TOTAL $11,410

  22. UTFAB Funding Criteria

  23. Thank you for supporting this experiment. Questions?

More Related