1 / 16

Production of ice in tropospheric clouds Alexander Lowag University of Miami

Production of ice in tropospheric clouds Alexander Lowag University of Miami. Motivation: - ice : influence on various atmospheric processes, including: + precipitation + cloud electrification + radiative transfer - liquid phase : number + chemical composition of aerosols --> number

Télécharger la présentation

Production of ice in tropospheric clouds Alexander Lowag University of Miami

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Production of ice in tropospheric clouds Alexander Lowag University of Miami

  2. Motivation: • - ice: influence on various atmospheric processes, including: + precipitation + cloud electrification + radiative transfer - liquid phase: number + chemical composition of aerosols --> number of cloud droplets - solid phase: physical / chemical principles of nucleation poorly under- stood - secondary mechanisms: enhancement of ice concentration (number / mass) , mechanism not completely known

  3. - homogeneous nucleation: proceeds from a random event in the pure liquid or solution without catalysis from foreign substance - classical nucleation theory: energy barrier can be calculated under the assumption that microscopic ice fragment forms in supercooled liquid - nucleation rate: J = A * exp (-∆E / kT) - calculated rates in contradiction with measured ones (water droplets at – 40º C) - where is the mistake? tenet of theory? inputs to it?

  4. - to calculate ∆E, density, viscosity, specific and latent heat and surface tension must be known • - Pruppacher (1995): singularity of water at -45º C, extrapolation of data aquired above 0º C However: liquid water at -70º C (Bartell and Huang, 1994) - Jeffrey and Austin (1997): analytic equation for state of water to obtain ∆E

  5. - homogeneous nucleation in Cu and Ci despite soluble aerosol particles - solute depresses melting and freezing point of ice - modified temperature to obtain nucleation rate: T' = T + µ * dT - Koop et al. (2002): nucleation rate only depends on water activity, not on solute -> Moehler et al. (2003) : freezing rate of sulfuric acid droplets -> but: spread in empirically determined µ outside experimental error margins (DeMott, 2002)

  6. - classical nucleation theory based on assumptions that may prove to limit its usefulness: + fragment initiating nucleation forms in the bulk liquid However: nucleation rate should be proportional to volume of liquid and not to how it is dispersed + embryo has same properties as bulk crystal (liquid to hexagonal ice without intermediate stage) However: nanometer-sized droplets at -70º C have cubic structure - cubic structure not stable -> consequences for ice in atmosphere

  7. - heterogeneous nucleation: freezing occurs via catalysis by a foreign body (T > -33º C) - typical aerosols: mineral dust, emissions from aircraft (soot) - equation for previous nucleation rate still applies, but ∆E is lower due to substrate - substrate forms a template on which water molecules adsorb in a configuration similar to the crystaline structure of ice - influence on radiative properties of Ci - dominating nucleators: mineral dust, fly ash, metallic particles

  8. - Zuberi et al. (2002): investigation of kaolinite and montmorillonite -> freezing points of droplets with immersed dust 10 º C higher - Hung et al. (2003): hematite and corundum aerosols in ammonium sulfate solution -> freezing point increased by 6º C - De Mott et al. (1999): investigation of ice-forming activity of black carbon particles -> untreated particles acted as deposition / absorption nuclei for T < -42º C -> activation characteristics of treated particles were similar to that of untreated ones -> multiple layers: as well as or even better than untreated particles

  9. - Soot: - surface character can have significant impact on its ice-nucleating efficiency -> chemical groups capable of forming hydrogen bonds increasing ice-forming potential -> particles with OH and carbonyl groups three orders of magnitude more efficient than those without - morphology of particle also important: “liquid” water down to -73º C

  10. - films of high-molecular-weight organic compounds -> long-chain alcohols, testosterone -> formation of a 2D hexagonal-like crystal at the air-water interface Memory effect (Preactivation): - increase in effective freezing temperature, lost if temperature exceeds some threshold typically close to melting temperature • - Seeley and Seidler (2001): -> long-chain alcohols exhibit preactivation -> ice formation / cooling below melting temperature not required, i.e. layer already present at room temperature

  11. Rosinski (1991): nucleation and evaporation of droplets -> ice crystals due to deposition - deactivation of ice nuclei: loss of ice-nucleating ability after sublimation of ice Contact nucleation: freezing of a droplet initiated by contact with an aerosol particle • - many substances have different freezing thresholds as a contact nuclei compared to being a condensation or immersion nuclei -> different freezing mechanisms for different modes - Seeley and Seidler (2001): examination of freezing characteristics of volcanic ash

  12. Secondary production: - Hallett-Mossop process: production of splinters during riming

  13. - consistent with ice concentration measured in Cu - could be varified in many cases: -> within convection in a frontal system off the coast of the UK (Hogan et al., 2002) -> in Cu in Mexico (Ovtchinnikov, 2000) -> ice concentrations higher than what could have been produced by Hallett-Mossop process

  14. Outstanding problems: - is freezing only a function of water activity? -> ammoniated compounds seem to be an exception - what is the mechanism underlying contact nucleation? - secondary production mechanisms in the presence of liquid water other than riming-splinting? “In summary, the origin of ice in cumuliform clouds remains a mystery” (Rangno and Hobbs, 1994)

More Related