1 / 44

Scheduled Model Predictive Control of Wind turbines in Above Rated Wind

Avishek Kumar Dr Karl Stol Department of Mechanical Engineering. Scheduled Model Predictive Control of Wind turbines in Above Rated Wind. Overview. Background Objectives Control Design Overview of MPC techniques Modelling Applied Controllers Results Conclusions. Background.

gisela-fields
Télécharger la présentation

Scheduled Model Predictive Control of Wind turbines in Above Rated Wind

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Avishek Kumar Dr Karl Stol Department of Mechanical Engineering Scheduled Model Predictive Control of Wind turbines in Above Rated Wind

  2. Overview • Background • Objectives • Control Design • Overview of MPC techniques • Modelling • Applied Controllers • Results • Conclusions

  3. Background

  4. Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines Source: US Department of Energy

  5. Control Objectives Speed control • Maintain rated rotor speed in above rated winds Load control • Oscillations occur in the Low Speed Shaft (LSS) • Reduce loads in LSS

  6. Turbine Nonlinearities

  7. Model Predictive Control Choose the control input trajectory that will minimize a cost function over the prediction horizon Hp Example:

  8. Why MPC? Accommodate disturbances MIMO Constraints Many cost functions Can extend to nonlinear systems

  9. Current State of MPC for Wind Turbines MPC using linear models of turbine (LMPC) • Lacks ability to deal with system nonlinearities MPC using nonlinear models of turbine • Difficult to increase order of model as explicit nonlinear equations become very complex • Computationally expensive

  10. Bridging the Gap Scheduled MPC (SMPC) Uses a network of linear models easily obtained from linearization codes (FAST) Optimization remains convex for each controller Controllers can be specifically tuned at various operating points to operate with different aims

  11. Objectives • Create Scheduled MPC for speed and LSS load regulation in above rated winds • Simulate nonlinear controller in Region 3 using high order model • Compare performance of nonlinear and linear controllers • Tower and blade load mitigation not considered at this stage

  12. MPC Overview

  13. Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulator Up till now, MPC has been posed as a finite horizon problem For better performance set up MPC as an infinite horizon problem This allows LQR control with constraints

  14. Infinite Horizon Cost Function for CLQR

  15. Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulator Design a LQR for the linear system giving predictions:

  16. Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulator Create a MPC to calculate perturbations c about control input given by the LQR only over Hp so constraints are met

  17. CLQR Minimization

  18. CLQR Block Diagram

  19. Scheduled MPC Create a network of MPCs at enough operating points to capture nonlinearities of system Tune each controller for the region it operates in Weight the outputs of each controller based on scheduling variable

  20. SMPC Block Diagram

  21. Model FAST model of Controls Advanced Research Turbine (CART) at NWTC 600kW Variable-Speed Variable-Pitch 2 Bladed

  22. Linear Model for Control Design/Disturbance Estimation

  23. Nonlinear Model for EKF (7) where

  24. Wind Turbine Control Design

  25. Baseline ControllersGSPI

  26. Baseline ControllersCLQR

  27. Scheduled MPC

  28. Scheduled MPC

  29. Scheduled MPC

  30. Simulations Simulations conducted in MATLAB/Simulink with FAST model Active DOF • Blade flap (modes 1 and 2) • Blade Edgewise • Teeter • Tower fore-aft (mode 1 and 2) • Drivetrain • Generator • Tower side-side

  31. Wind Inputs 15ms-1 5% turbulence intensity 18ms-1 5% turbulence intensity 22ms-1 5% turbulence intensity 18ms-1 15% turbulence intensity

  32. Performance Criteria Rotor Speed RMS Error Low Speed Shaft Damage Equivalent Load RMS Pitch Acceleration

  33. Tuning Each SMPC controller tuned to have same speed control as GSPI in respective low turbulence wind Each SMPC controller tuned to have same LSS load control as CLQR in respective low turbulence wind

  34. Results

  35. Constraints

  36. Speed Control

  37. LSS DEL

  38. Pitch Acceleration

  39. Conclusions SMPC can successfully control a turbine in above rated wind conditions SMPC has ability to control MIMO systems with multiple control objectives SMPC adjusts to the system nonlinearities SMPC satisfies input constraints Each controller in the SMPC network can be finely tuned to achieve the required performance in its region of operation

  40. Future Work Add individual blade pitch control Increase control objectives to include tower and blade loads Quantify computational requirements Compare with NMPC Use of more advanced disturbance prediction models

  41. Questions?

  42. Nonlinear Model (7) where

  43. Extended Kalman Filter FL design needs accurate wind speed estimate Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) is a nonlinear state estimator Sub optimal Linearizes the system model each time step, then estimates states like a linear Kalman Filter

  44. Choosing Hp

More Related