1 / 5

KA 5 : Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture

KA 5 : Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture. 105 proposals submitted to stage 1 evaluation 97 Shared cost projects & 1 mixed project (93.3 %) 4 Concerted Actions & 3 thematic networks (6.7 %) 97 proposals evaluated + 3 Not Eligible (2.9 %)

gizela
Télécharger la présentation

KA 5 : Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. KA 5 : Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture • 105 proposals submitted to stage 1 evaluation • 97 Shared cost projects & 1 mixed project (93.3 %) • 4 Concerted Actions & 3 thematic networks (6.7 %) • 97 proposals evaluated + 3 Not Eligible (2.9 %) • 5 proposals rejected as not anonymous (4.8 %) • fewer problems of eligibility than in previous calls • To stage 2 (27/105) 26% Overall success (25/105) 24 % • 24 shared costs passed to stage 2 (25 %) • 3 CA or TN passed to stage 2 (43 %) • Stage 1: 55 experts in 3 pools (week 47 to 49) • Stage 2 : pool of 14 experts - 7 from stage 1 (week 2)

  2. KA 5 : Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture • Environment & fisheries interactions : 13proposals (0 CA) - 2 to stage 2 (15.4 %) • Environment & aquaculture interactions : 8 proposals (0 CA) - 2to stage 2 (25 %) • Scientific basis of fisheries management 32 proposals (1 CA) - 8to stage 2 (25 %) • Aquaculture genetics : 14 proposals (0 CA) - 5 to stage 2 (35.7 %) • Aquaculture general: 24proposals (1 CA, 1 TN) - 3 to stage 2 (12.5 %) • Monitoring & enforcement of the CFP 6proposals (1 CA, 1 Mix) - 2 to stage 2 (33.3 %) • Social & economic basis of the CFP 8proposals (1 CA, 1 TN) - 5 to stage 2 (62.5 %)

  3. Relevant KA priorities served Aqua./Fish. balance (1/3 -2/3) 3 Mediterranean proposals Successful props. in all areas Environmental interactions/ Fish. (2prop.) /Aqua (2 prop.) Fish. Management (7 prop. with 2 acoustic methods) Aquaculture (3 general + 4 genetics - Salmon & seabass) VMS & traceability in 5.4.3 5 props. in 5.4.4. (Soc-eco)with 1 on ICZM (5.5.1) Major shortcomings Only 2 CA & 1 TN (11%) Some proposals not well targeted on call priorities Nothing on gear selectivity Limited relevance to CFP 1233, 1836 of little use 2 rejections (1534, 1298) in stage 2 (< 3.50) despite CFP relevance FISHERIES & AQUACULTUREExpert ranked list assessment (25 proposals)

  4. Relevant KA priorities served balance between areas interactions (11% +8%) management (30%) aquaculture (13% + 23%) Monitoring (6%) Socio-economics (8%) genome mapping of 2 Medit. Species stock identification methods for cod & herring improved survey methods (trawl & acoustics) Essential gaps 6.7% CA but 43% success rate Call priorities better targeted (no proposal out of scope) Lack of multi-disciplinarity or insufficient integration relevant proposals often of insufficient scientific quality Lack of information on methodologies Lack of risk assessment 5 unsuccessful proposals on gear/benthos impacts FISHERIES & AQUACULTUREOverall assessment (105 proposals)

  5. Sustainable fisheries: Anticipated deliverables • Objective information in support of policy orientations and Community measures (CFP) • Development of tools & methods • to foster, assess, measure and monitor fisheries competitiveness & sustainability • to anticipate the CFP needs for adaptation • to reduce negative impacts on the environment • to enhance societal benefits • Assessment of the effectiveness of these tools, methods and policy instruments

More Related