1 / 16

WHAT IS STRATEGY?

WHAT IS STRATEGY?. Michael Porter & Gary Hamel. GLOBAL BUSINESS STRATEGY 2001. OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS IS NOT STRATEGY. OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS IS NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT OE MEANS PERFORMING SIMILAR ACTIVITIES BETTER THAN RIVALS

gizi
Télécharger la présentation

WHAT IS STRATEGY?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WHAT IS STRATEGY? Michael Porter & Gary Hamel GLOBAL BUSINESS STRATEGY 2001

  2. OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS IS NOT STRATEGY • OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS IS NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT • OE MEANS PERFORMING SIMILAR ACTIVITIES BETTER THAN RIVALS • STRATEGY MEANS PERFORMING DIFFERENT ACTIVTIES OR SIMILAR ACTIVITIES IN DIFFERENT WAYS

  3. JAPANESE COMPANIES RARELY HAVE STRATEGIES • MOST JAPANESE COMPANIES IMITATE & EMULATE ONE ANOTHER • THUS, OE IS WHAT DISTINGUISHES ONE FIRM FROM ANOTHER • HOMOGENIZATION OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES

  4. STRATEGY RESTS ON UNIQUE ACTIVITIES • STRATEGY IS ACTING DIFFERENTLY THAN RIVALS DO • SO, STRATEGY IS NOT SERVING CUSTOMERS BUT SERVING THEM BETTER THAN OTHERS DO • STRATEGY IS PERCEIVING NEW POSITIONS TO WOO CUSTOMERS

  5. STRATEGIC POSITIONS & GENERIC STRATEGIES • GENERIC STRATEGIES • 1) COST LEADERSHIP • 2) DIFFERENTIATION • 3) FOCUS

  6. STRATEGIC POSITIONS BASED ON • CUSTOMERS’ NEEDS (TRADITIONAL SEGMENT TARGETING) • CUSTOMERS’ ACCESSIBILITY (CARMIKE CINEMAS; CITIES < 200,000) • VARIETY OF A COMPANY’S PRODUCTS OR SERVICES (A CHOICE BASED ON PRODUCT/SERVICE, NOT CUSTOMER SEGMENT; JIFFY LUBE)

  7. SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIC POSITION • REQUIRES TRADE-OFFS • INCONSISTENCIES IN IMAGE & REP • DIFFERENT POSITIONS REQUIRE DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES (INFLEXIBLE) • LIMITS ON INTERNAL COORDINATION & CONTROL

  8. FIT DRIVES COMPETITIVEADVANTAGE & SUSTAINABILITY • FIRST ORDER FIT IS CONSISTENCY BETWN EACH ACTIVITY (FUNCTION) • SECOND ORDER FIT WHEN ACTIVITIES ARE REINFORCING • THIRD ORDER FIT OCCURS WHEN OPTIMIZATION OF EFFORT (REDUCING REDUNDANCY & WASTE)

  9. GENERAL MANAGEMENT’S ROLE • DEFINING A COMPANY’S POSITION • MAKING TRADE-OFFS • FORGING FIT AMONG ACTIVITIES • THUS, PROVIDING LEADERSHIP

  10. STRATEGY AS REVOLUTIONBy GARY HAMEL

  11. STRATEGY AS REVOLUTION • 10 PRINCIPLES • 9 ROUTES TO INDUSTRY REVOLUTION

  12. 10 PRINCIPLES WHICH WORDS? • STRATEGIC • PLANNING ISN’T • STRATEGIC • Ritualistic • Reductionist • Extrapolative • Positioning • Elitist • Easy Inquisitive Expansive Prescient Inventing Inclusive Demanding

  13. 10 PRINCIPLES • 2) STRATEGY MAKING MUST BE SUBVERSIVE • 3) THE BOTTLENECK IS AT THE TOP OF THE BOTTLE • 4) REVOLUTIONARIES EXIST IN EVERY COMPANY • 5) CHANGE IS NOT THE PROBLEM; ENGAGEMENT IS

  14. STRATEGY AS REVOLUTION • 6) STRATEGY MAKING MUST BE DEMOCRATIC • 7) ANYONE CAN BE A STRATEGY ACTIVIST • 8) PERSPECTIVE IS WORTH 50 IQ POINTS • 9) TOP-DOWN & BOTTOM-UP ARE NOT ALTERNATIVES • 10) YOU CAN’T SEE THE END FROM THE BEGINNING

  15. 9 Routes to Industry Revolution Reconceiving a Product/service Greatly improve price/performance Separate form & function Achieve joy of use Redefining Market space Push bounds of universality Strive for individuality Increase accessibility Redrawing Ind Boundaries Rescaling industries Compress supply chain Drive convergence or blur boundaries

  16. Porter is an American a business economist outside-in analytical, structural & lineal position in industry determines all generic strategies Hamel is English, trained in U.S. trained as a strategist inside-out less analytical, lineal & structural strategic intent & core competence can’t predict Porter vs. Hamel

More Related