1 / 10

RUS-2 and GAINS have the common objectives

RUS-2 and GAINS have the common objectives. Elaboration of feasible technical and economically sound alternatives and scenarios of transitions to closure of INS nuclear fuel cycle. RUS-2 and GAINS have some differences.

glain
Télécharger la présentation

RUS-2 and GAINS have the common objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RUS-2 and GAINS have the common objectives • Elaboration of feasible technical and economically sound alternatives and scenarios of transitions to closure of INS nuclear fuel cycle

  2. RUS-2 and GAINS have some differences • GAINS is more focused on elaboration of global scenarios for the transition from the current NE system, based on thermal reactors to closed nuclear fuel cycle INS based on synergy a fast and thermal reactors • RUS-2 is more focused on assessment of advanced and innovative nuclear fuel cycle technologies within large scale Innovative Nuclear Energy System based on Closed Nuclear Fuel cycle concept

  3. INPRO CP-JI in the area of INFC Global INS CP RUS-1-GAINS IAEA Multilateral Nuclear Approaches (MNA) CP RUS-2- AINFCT-CNFC Innovative NFCT Advanced NFCT Current NFCT

  4. Interactions with GAINS • GAINS provide input to the Project regarding • general scenarios, • data on structure and reactors composition of INSCFC on a global and national levels in a long term prospects based on energy demands projections, • scale of the national nuclear energy system development strategies. • The Project on the basis of these input will elaborate • prospective NFC alternatives of a different AINFCFC options for each INSCFC scenario with identification • of most promising options based on the jointly agreed criteria in order to reach maximum utilization of nuclear material potential, • its availability, competitiveness, minimize waste generation, excellent safety and optimal NFC structure. • The Project provides to GAINS • Assessment results of a different AINFCFC options for each INSCFC scenario with identification of most promising options • GAINS further considers and adjust • the structure of INSCFC to be consistent with a structure and capability of AINFCFC which are going to serve CNFC on a global and national levels and make appropriate recommendations

  5. Rus-2 Time Schedule 2008 2009 2010 2007 Kick off meeting Élaboration of NFC options for INSCFC 1STCM Identification of AINFFC options 2 STCM Fissile&Fertile nuclear material flow analysis 3 STCM Identification for each AINFFC options input/output parameters and characteristics 4 STCM 5 STCM Assessment using INPRO Methodology of different AINFCFC Identification of most promising AINFFC options Conclusion and recommendations. Final Report 6 STCM Today

  6. GAINS Time Schedule 2008 2009 2010 2007 1STCM Kick off meeting 2 STCM Selection of scenarios for nuclear power deployment and fuel cycle options. 3 STCM 4 STCM Simulation of INS architecture under storylines 5 STCM 6 STCM Study of the developed scenarios and options Analysing of the results received Preparation of conclusions on a global architecture Conclusions on a global architecture of the reviewed INS capability Compiling a final report on the study Today

  7. Interconnection of GAINS and RUS-2 2008 2009 2010 2007 Kick off meeting Jointly Élaboration of NFC options for INSCFC 1STCM Identification of AINFFC options Jointly 2 STCM Fissile&Fertile nuclear material flow analysis RUS-2 3 STCM Identification for each AINFFC options input/output parameters and characteristics RUS-2 4 STCM 5 STCM Assessment using INPRO Methodology of different AINFCFC RUS-2 Identification of most promising AINFFC options Jointly Conclusion and recommandations. Final Report Jointly 6 STCM Today

  8. CONCLUSION Taking into account that the nature and objectives of GAINS and RUS-2 are very similar, complement and common, the participants are strongly support ICG efforts to establish a very close interrelation and coordination between two projects in terms of data and results exchange as well time schedule implementation and results analysis and final report preparation.

  9. CONCLUSION(2) • Two Projects management should • establish a clear mechanism for coordination and communication, • elaborate and agree upon on common input/output data and results format and structure to be used for the needs of each Project • appoint liaison officers.

More Related