1 / 19

Modeling thermoelectric properties of TI materials: a Landauer approach

DARPA-TI meeting, April 25, 2012. Modeling thermoelectric properties of TI materials: a Landauer approach. Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom. Network for Computational Nanotechnology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA. Overview. Motivation.

gordon
Télécharger la présentation

Modeling thermoelectric properties of TI materials: a Landauer approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DARPA-TI meeting, April 25, 2012 Modeling thermoelectric properties of TI materials: a Landauer approach Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Network for Computational Nanotechnology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA

  2. Overview • Motivation. • Summary of the thermoelectric effect. • Thermoelectric modeling within the Landauer approach. • Example: effect of TI surface states on the thermoelectric properties of Bi2Te3 films.

  3. Motivation • In recent years, much research has focused energy-related science and technology, in particular thermoelectrics. • Some of the best known thermoelectric materials happen to be topological insulators (e.g., Bi2Te3). • Work has appeared showing that TI surface states in ultra-thin films (<10 nm) can lead to enhanced thermoelectric properties. ZT ~ 2 P. Ghaemiet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 166603 (2010). ZT ~ 7 F. Zahid and R. Lake, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 212102 (2010). Next step is to reproduce and perhaps expand these results.

  4. Overview of thermoelectric effect G: Electrical conductance S: Seebeck coefficient κ0: Thermal conductance (electronic contribution) Electric current: Heat current: External parameters Material properties Thermoelectric efficiency ΔT = T1 – T2 T2 T1 Ie IQ V1 V2 ΔV = V1 – V2

  5. Overview of thermoelectric effect G: Electrical conductance S: Seebeck coefficient κ0: Thermal conductance (electronic contribution) Electric current: Heat current: Seebeck (S) : factor relating ΔT to ΔV (zero current). Material properties Peltier (Π) : factor relating Ie to IQ (zero T-gradient). ΔT = T1 – T2 T2 T1 Ie IQ V1 V2 ΔV = V1 – V2

  6. Electronic transport in the Landauer picture I e- e- Device/structure Reservoir in thermodynamic equilibirum Reservoir in thermodynamic equilibirum • Electrons flow when there is a difference in carrier occupation (f1 and f2). • Carriers travel through the device region both elastically and ballistically(i.e. quantum transport).

  7. Electronic transport in the Landauer picture • Non-equilibrium transport • Near equilibrium (linear response) • Differential conductance (energy-dependent G) • Average transmission times the number of conducting channels (Ballistic)

  8. Diffusive transport in the Landauer picture Scattering Band structure : Mean-free-path for backscattering • Average mean-free-path times the number of conducting channels per unit area.

  9. What is M(ε)? • M(ε) is the number of conducting channels. • One band = One mode for conduction (“band counting” method). • Roughly corresponds to number of half-wavelengths that fit in cross-section. • Each mode contributes a conductance of G0. Courtesy of ChangwookJeong M(ε,k) Si Fermi surface In 2D or 3D, the “band counting” method for applies to every transverse k-state.

  10. Effect of dimensionality on M(ε) • Parabolic bands 1D: 2D: 3D: S. Kim, S. Datta and M. Lundstrom, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 034506 (2009).

  11. Thermoelectric transport coefficients Physically intuitive form (assuming constant λ0): Conductivity Seebeck Electronic thermal conductivity (zero field) Lattice thermal Conductivity (phonon) Electronic thermal conductivity (zero current)

  12. Lattice thermal transport within Landauer • Lattice / phonon transport is the same as electron transport within the Landauer approach. • In principle, one can utilize the Landauer model to perform a complete assessment of thermoelectric performance (electron + phonon). • Figures: Bi2Te3 phonon modes (top) and lattice thermal conductivity (bottom). [Courtesy of ChangwookJeong] Mph (1018 m-2) THz (s-1) κph (Wm-1K-1) T (K) [Courtesy of ChangwookJeong]

  13. Example: TI states in Bi2Te3 films Estimate impact of TI surface states on the thermoelectric characteristics of variable thickness Bi2Te3 films. • Electronic states of film: sum of bulk Bi2Te3 states (varying with tfilm) and TI surface states (independent of tfilm). • Bulk states calculated from first principles. • TI surface states approximated by analytical expression. • Neglect TI/bulk and TI/TI hybridization.

  14. Bulk states Band structure Good comparison with experiment using constant MFP. Deeper in CB Scattering Deeper in VB Exp. data: Proc. Phys. Soc. 71, 633 (1958).

  15. TI surface states Dispersion of TI state Analytical model: Alignment of TI surface state relative to bulk Bi2Te3 taken from exp. study. [Y. L. Chen et al., Science 325, 178 (2009)]. vk = 2.55 eV Å λ = 250 eV Å3 [L.Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 266801 (2009)] Distribution of modes (TI state) Iso-energy of TI state Shape of the Fermi surface confirmed experimentally [Y. L. Chen et al., Science 325, 178 (2009)]. Distribution of modes is linear in energy. λ is taken to be 100 nm [F. Xiuet al., Nature Nano. 6, 216 (2011)].

  16. Conductivity (TI + bulk states) Sheet conductivity • Conductivity > 10x σBulk at tfilm = 10 nm. • Significant difference between film and bulk σ at tfilm =100 nm. • Surface conduction largest in bulk band gap. • Large fraction of surface conduction for n-type (exp. EF @ 0.05 eV above CB*). * Y. L. Chen et al., Science 325, 178 (2009).

  17. Seebeck coefficient (TI + bulk states) S weighted by conductance • Max. Seebeck reduced ~35% @ 100nm and ~70% @ 10nm. • Effect of TI surface state observed at 1µm. • How do results change with λsurf? tfilm = 10 nm tfilm = 100 nm • When λsurf decreases 10x, S increases < 2x. • Decreasing λsurf one order of magnitude is equivalent to increasing tfilm by the same factor.

  18. Power factor (TI + bulk states) • Significant reduction in power factor with the presence of TI surface states. • Aside from conductivity, all thermoelectric characteristics are degraded with the surface states. • Hinder surface conduction by enhancing scattering or destroying the surface states. Surface roughness or adding magnetic impurities may enhance thermoelectric performance.

  19. Conclusions • Landauer approach is a powerful formalism for calculating the thermoelectric coefficients of materials, particularly when combined with full band descriptions of electronic dispersion. • This method naturally spans from ballistic to diffusive transport regimes and considers bulk and nano-scale systems. • Within our example, TI surface states were shown to degrade the thermoelectric performance of Bi2Te3 films (when the thickness is large enough to form a gap in the TI states). • Hindering surface conduction may enhance thermoelectric performance, e.g. introducing surface roughness and/or magnetic impurities.

More Related