SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

CATASTROPHE INSURANCE

goro avatar
goro
19 diapositives · 435 Views · Jul 26, 2012

CATASTROPHE INSURANCE. Insurance 101 The Myth:. RISK PURE RISK - chance of a loss – usually computed in $$$. SPECULATIVE RISK – chance of a loss or gain in $$$$$. Risk taking behavior – Individuals will take more chances to incur a gain than a loss. Insurability .

CATASTROPHE INSURANCE - slide 1
01 / 19CATASTROPHE INSURANCE
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

CATASTROPHE INSURANCE
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. CATASTROPHE INSURANCE

  2. Insurance 101 The Myth: • RISK • PURE RISK - chance of a loss – usually computed in $$$. • SPECULATIVE RISK – chance of a loss or gain in $$$$$. • Risk taking behavior – Individuals will take more chances to incur a gain than a loss.

  3. Insurability • Events are separate, occur many times and have relatively small damage amounts. • Frequency and severity of loss can be predicted from previous history. • Combining many similar risks increases ability to predict future losses. • Pooling many similar risks increases profit. • Rates can be set to account for projected losses.

  4. Catastrohpe • Risks are specific, not evenly distributed. • Frequency and severity are not reasonably predictable. • $$ Losses are larger with a longer pay out period. • Pooling similar risks is NOT a good idea.

  5. Casualty Insurance

  6. Catastrophic Loss Stress Point Insured Losses > $100 BillionMegaCat$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Katrina: $45B$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Andrew: $22B$$$$$$$$$$WTC : $21B$$$$$$$$North-ridge: $18.5B$$$$$$

  7. Reinsurance • An insurance policy an insurance company buys to cover some of its losses. • Companies are multinational. • Are not regulated by State or US.

  8. CURRENT PROBLEMS • Risk taking behavior. • Nature of Insurance – replacement. • Industry and regulators’ response. • Subsidies and Rate Control • Federal disaster payouts.

  9. Earthquake/Casualty Insurance – Catch 22 • Casualty insurance – coverage you buy that you hope you don’t have to use. • Statistically there is a fairly good chance that you will within a defined period of time. Catastrophe/Earthquake Insurance – coverage you buy that you probably won’t get to use. Statistically a small probability of a very large loss; smaller loss would be below deductible.

  10. Insurance “Puts you back where you were”. • SHOULD YOU STILL BE THERE???

  11. Industry and Public Reactions • Need a sufficient number of policies. • Only 14% of Western Washington homeowners carry earthquake insurance. Those that do represent the riskier end of the spectrum. • Companies limit new policies after disaster. • Need to insure to value (actuarily sound rates) • “Homeowners Against Citizens Florida petitions state leaders to stop increasing homeowners rates.” (St Petersburg Times 9/14/06)

  12. Subsidies and Rate Control Subsidies are politically motivated and an inefficient use of tax dollars. “Senators Landrieu and Vitter of Louisiana object to the senate rate increases for flood insurance, fearing they would price theirconstituents out of the market”.(Times-Picayune, 9/13/06) Rate Control is not actuarily driven, gives preference to certain groups.

  13. Federal Disaster Payouts IF THE GOVERNMENT HANDS OUT MONEY, DO WE REALLY NEED INSURANCE??? “No, I didn’t have any damage, but I just want what everyone else is getting”. (New Orleans resident angry that he couldn’t get a new ‘fridge, October 18, 2005.)

  14. National Flood Insurance Program Federal program established 1968. Low overall participation. Not solvent on its own. $20.8B underfunded. Current “fixes” in dispute. California Earthquake Authority Quasi public, quasi private program. Low participation. Would not be solvent if more of the at-risk properties were covered. CURRENT PROGRAMS

  15. Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Insurance State reinsurance. Question on whether the threshold amounts are correct. Could be severly underfunded. Terrorism Risk Insurance Act National Reinsurance. Good until 2008 Take up rate increasing. 100% of Workers’ Comp.

  16. Citizens Property Insurers Insurer of Last Resort • Book of Business includes: • High risk properties, whether by location or construction, • High value properties. Rates are controlled, not actuarily sound. Funded by premiums from policy holders and assessments from companies. $1M plus properties represent 10% of the premium dollars but only 2% of the policies written.

  17. Catastrophe ProposalsPublicly FreeFunded_____________________ Market

  18. Could it Work? Hard to Say - • Need: • Assumption of risk at the personal level. • Full participation with opt out provision. • If a person opts out will not get funds. • Disasters need to be rated separately. • Companies need to know the maximum probable loss, so need to base rates on value. • Reinsurance needs to be available no matter what the market. Federal stop loss provision?