1 / 28

DEC Conference, San Francisco, CA October, 2013

National Picture –Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education: Implications and Use. Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI. DEC Conference, San Francisco, CA October, 2013.

graceland
Télécharger la présentation

DEC Conference, San Francisco, CA October, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Picture –Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education: Implications and Use Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRILynne Kahn, ECO at FPGChristina Kasprzak, ECO at FPGCornelia Taylor, ECO at SRILauren Barton, ECO at SRI DEC Conference, San Francisco, CA October, 2013

  2. Overview • 2011-2012 national numbers • Trends for the last 4 years • State approaches and data quality

  3. Ultimate Goal for EI and ECSE “To enable young children to be active and successful participants during the early childhood years and in the future in a variety of settings – in their homes with their families, in child care, preschool or school programs, and in the community.” Based on the ECO stakeholder process when identifying 3 functional outcomes Entire document available at http://projects.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/assets/pdfs/ECO_Outcomes_4-13-05.pdf Early Childhood Outcomes Center

  4. Understanding the Three Child Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center

  5. Three Child Outcomes • Children have positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships) • Children acquire and use knowledge and skills (including early language/ communication [and early literacy]) • Children use appropriate behaviors to meet their needs

  6. Child Outcomes Step by Step • Available at: http://projects.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/pages/videos.cfm Early Childhood Outcomes Center

  7. Outcomes Are Functional Functional outcomes: • Refer to using skills to accomplish things that are meaningful to the child in the context of everyday life • Refer to an integrated series of behaviors or skills that allow the child to achieve the important everyday goals Early Childhood Outcomes Center

  8. Children Have Positive Social Relationships • Involves: • Relating with adults • Relating with other children • For older children, following rules related to groups or interacting with others • Includes areas like: • Attachment/separation/autonomy • Expressing emotions and feelings • Learning social rules and expectations • Social interactions and play Early Childhood Outcomes Center

  9. Children Acquire and Use Knowledge and Skills • Involves: • Thinking • Reasoning • Remembering • Problem solving • Using symbols and language • Understanding physical and social worlds • Includes: • Early concepts—symbols, pictures, numbers, classification, spatial relationships • Imitation • Object permanence • Expressive and receptive language and communication • Early literacy Early Childhood Outcomes Center

  10. Children Take Appropriate Action to Meet Their Needs • Involves: • Taking care of basic needs • Getting from place to place • Using tools (e.g., fork, toothbrush, crayon) • In older children, contributing to their own health and safety • Includes: • Integrating motor skills to complete tasks • Self-help skills (e.g., dressing, feeding, grooming, toileting, household responsibility) • Acting on the world to get what one wants Early Childhood Outcomes Center

  11. OSEP Reporting CategoriesPercentage of children who: a. Did not improve functioning b. Improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers c. Improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it d. Improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers e. Maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers 3 outcomes x 5 “measures” = 15 numbers Early Childhood Outcomes Center

  12. The Summary Statements • Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in each outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 3 [6] years of age or exited the program. • The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in each outcome by the time they turned 3 [6] years of age or exited the program. Early Childhood Outcomes Center

  13. State Approaches to Measuring Child Outcomes – 2011-12

  14. 3 Methods Methods for Calculating National Estimates • All states averaged (each state weighted as 1) • All states weighted by child count • States with the highest quality data weighted by child count to represent all states* *The data we will be presenting for the national picture

  15. Identifying States with Quality Data Criteria for high quality data: • Reporting data on enough children • Part C – 28% or more of exiters • Preschool – 12% or more of child count • Within expected patterns in the data • category ‘a’ not greater than 10% • category ‘e’ not greater than 65%

  16. Number of States that Met Criteria for Inclusion in the National Analysis

  17. Additional Analysis Additional analysis run to determine if child outcome data varies: • By exiters no longer eligible • By percent served

  18. Good News! • Consistent data over time • Increasing number of children in the child outcomes data • Increasing number of states in the ‘quality’ data for child outcomes

  19. Current Emphasis • Data Quality • Increasing the number of children/families in the data • Pattern checking to identify data quality issues • Training, guidance, supervision, etc. • Use of Data for Program Improvement • Linking data to other data • Interpreting data at the state and local levels • Making plans for improving systems and services

  20. 2-page highlights • Fall webinars

  21. Find more resources at: http://www.the-eco-center.org

More Related